Received: by 10.213.65.68 with SMTP id h4csp681498imn; Wed, 4 Apr 2018 05:36:14 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx48hkQg/0Qek6ydk0Cs6h9FM8FDq4oxfchVdFjePYxhzujpnXWaIbW1uwNBszqL72dy7Mk0X X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:ac8a:: with SMTP id h10-v6mr18504802plr.290.1522845374378; Wed, 04 Apr 2018 05:36:14 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1522845374; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=CHCLUbUDfHETbHEfVVlQL+cvKNhJHVWIUv7FVraPdiaM7DHN8BsQB8iQiP5yppApdA HmVkr+oWEhEpCtBWAL9eChiL1sv67R6bx7FaxF7OcWBNzTUzYDKv2X7aV+nRbWctCpcw u/OBE4wpmFcNU2fBmeE26IWDucBFibf5nrRZtCHOMrj6mXV62JSNNKxUvA5MtFmRJbT/ xBHIcu/Jen2d8JivzPUIEQ/mID6qiypvq5mpBfuO3X4mi6weogKI9KN8/Msew9eR3kly 9ceHxuiFmS8MEXsbLS510ihPV1CXdJhcb32VERR+awW0ku9o2+mOjJwbWTIZzyRwQkvB 1NqA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:date:to:from:subject:message-id :arc-authentication-results; bh=ps6Je7vOZiJLmjrvclLYtpqtU7MJNRCG4ZmA54hKC18=; b=EAf/PvaSevFJKKEHBADGBqamK51DYX5+q5MF/AQmriKIbQ7/v02dfWhJ6w+xqWT+O+ YwAki2Mjjen+urIws4ml+rtIq+AljN2iDEwizv69Qh8TR2cB5FCN6VEY4/h0BVWk1+/K bsIinU4L0N/1Oozix5g+ROMrsTF3O410ZkeEF5Ew7snISpMf1bzomHl4MhxiWDDRiNFq f6gmvksEEiVI8CcVx34QlE7DT+ErRRI/mngvWf8x01psSdbt5qQfNp6tpjkklPxtg0NM gVPYPub2goYktS8zbbJs+BLrqcq3N//lnpnX0lPOf7TBXsnaJP0fympM+cL0vnh2k8eE Y4pA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id t4-v6si2994896plb.641.2018.04.04.05.36.00; Wed, 04 Apr 2018 05:36:14 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751296AbeDDMev (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 4 Apr 2018 08:34:51 -0400 Received: from mx3-rdu2.redhat.com ([66.187.233.73]:37050 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751167AbeDDMet (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Apr 2018 08:34:49 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 579534040853; Wed, 4 Apr 2018 12:34:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown [10.32.181.48]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3E1A2024CA2; Wed, 4 Apr 2018 12:34:48 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1522845288.2606.3.camel@redhat.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: improve ipv4 performances From: Paolo Abeni To: Anton Gary Ceph , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2018 14:34:48 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20180401183121.13022-1-agaceph@gmail.com> References: <20180401183121.13022-1-agaceph@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.78 on 10.11.54.4 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.11.55.5]); Wed, 04 Apr 2018 12:34:49 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: inspected by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.11.55.5]); Wed, 04 Apr 2018 12:34:49 +0000 (UTC) for IP:'10.11.54.4' DOMAIN:'int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com' HELO:'smtp.corp.redhat.com' FROM:'pabeni@redhat.com' RCPT:'' Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 2018-04-01 at 20:31 +0200, Anton Gary Ceph wrote: > After a few profiling and analysis, turned out that the ethertype field > of the packets has the following distribution: [...] > 0.6% don't know/no opinion Am I the only one finding the submission date and the above info suspicious ?!? /P