Received: by 10.213.65.68 with SMTP id h4csp997012imn; Wed, 4 Apr 2018 10:44:45 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx48uGj9SaML9b0TDSfhXe5XU7Hj7/L3wgezDhe5QgcDQJSa6/20jGkZFX4XXDrLqx/sd0N3F X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:b288:: with SMTP id u8-v6mr19243244plr.339.1522863885781; Wed, 04 Apr 2018 10:44:45 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1522863885; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=IhgTvpouhRrLeiyua+ddTIefCVtd80KZbLvhGFG5UAIEtYl2bAEh81GZG0SM94FvJX LGEoR6dO31Nbsd+ogygD39oqSYGiKGVZYJ+kqrbUkB/gh86ZCTF2HMrOsBKaJ3KcGHYK keY5wzuktPQyYiTRB0qdiiJ3Mv8EbGyc84jRXkX3aK1ncCKYMZmWfAgnoCyfxWXPpCgj phEbC02piU6idwCEzewW95CSvyCljTDk7yvfrSP1zAG1e70usAfAH1mOMqIZCuo3X2ul Wk6iAvbgC7+C6U8pX5EhwkRALPQS8QIzkjsCEF6PyZfIaBJMwpJdQMVwMZsFXG2wGlnd P01A== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:organization:from:references:cc:to:subject :arc-authentication-results; bh=g8QsqG7521NHQTaSdZf8mzvCu1WUrseFsY5vUYtopmM=; b=DA/P95RPNoaYhF62nraTfe8hQwGJXxCArnkFkmk6yv2+hMsByTGI4Vms1nbvTeOXEW i73H2llF8gIqt+wRR/wWUGbRMeWVCXqcVz6eeJnnKbrd8VLSKZEjqgfGAwJNEKpnTCip ES6qX8ssaU7vLXQqoZfTeJpBak7/+0zz/YE/dtvkSX7QuLX/zAbpY//cXHu9opqVY0U2 6UHKFV8ft5J7f1ntCc/ouvyCX4ywkeE/sIxzJ+YqRw0EUXerEv9uVuBf5MxIEnzw2os4 oQEgAzRVjx10QC/8VXJNUE0EbhXUaqx1siEMK2EnXdySheuPw6WrimLxFxJA8yZn2jwo FtQQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id p23si4519172pfj.40.2018.04.04.10.44.31; Wed, 04 Apr 2018 10:44:45 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751339AbeDDRnX (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 4 Apr 2018 13:43:23 -0400 Received: from mx3-rdu2.redhat.com ([66.187.233.73]:51030 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750915AbeDDRnW (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Apr 2018 13:43:22 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7AD0E406E8B9; Wed, 4 Apr 2018 17:43:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.36.116.87] (ovpn-116-87.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.87]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 012E61208F6C; Wed, 4 Apr 2018 17:43:19 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] KVM: X86: Introduce handle_ud() To: Paolo Bonzini , Wanpeng Li , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org Cc: =?UTF-8?B?UmFkaW0gS3LEjW3DocWZ?= , Andrew Cooper , Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , Liran Alon References: <1522798129-14588-1-git-send-email-wanpengli@tencent.com> <1522798129-14588-2-git-send-email-wanpengli@tencent.com> <9d68b1b4-04e6-46d6-70b4-6ebcb0a0c4aa@redhat.com> <16957e9b-103a-0fd5-9e2b-084e9ebc3773@redhat.com> From: David Hildenbrand Organization: Red Hat GmbH Message-ID: Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2018 19:43:19 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <16957e9b-103a-0fd5-9e2b-084e9ebc3773@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.78 on 10.11.54.3 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.11.55.7]); Wed, 04 Apr 2018 17:43:21 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: inspected by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.11.55.7]); Wed, 04 Apr 2018 17:43:21 +0000 (UTC) for IP:'10.11.54.3' DOMAIN:'int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com' HELO:'smtp.corp.redhat.com' FROM:'david@redhat.com' RCPT:'' Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 04.04.2018 19:12, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On 04/04/2018 13:54, David Hildenbrand wrote: >>> +{ >>> + enum emulation_result er; >>> + >>> + er = emulate_instruction(vcpu, EMULTYPE_TRAP_UD); >>> + if (er == EMULATE_USER_EXIT) >>> + return 0; >>> + if (er != EMULATE_DONE) >>> + kvm_queue_exception(vcpu, UD_VECTOR); >>> + return 1; >> I would now actually prefer >> >> if (er == EMULATE_DONE) >> return 1 ... > > Why? The return statement would be duplicated. > > Paolo > I was talking about two equality checks vs. 1 equality and 1 inequality check. er = emulate_instruction(vcpu, EMULTYPE_TRAP_UD); if (er == EMULATE_USER_EXIT) return 0; else if (er == EMULATE_DONE) return 1; return kvm_queue_exception(vcpu, UD_VECTOR); -- Thanks, David / dhildenb