Received: by 10.213.65.68 with SMTP id h4csp1349140imn; Wed, 4 Apr 2018 17:55:16 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx492+uVyn8x9TtX8Ch9BP9PvbJLru14UCt8cdsc2F7/QRMYLYjNye1bGlf6vIq8R6BOEHVz4 X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:7e42:: with SMTP id a2-v6mr20742588pln.13.1522889716855; Wed, 04 Apr 2018 17:55:16 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1522889716; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=p8SOYvNURa50Fjp1sOphG4DQBVoB06iYX61Z8ndJIKOdipPvEYLySEORg0VxgBEvps /rg0mYHg758KhXXmbVpc2dX6y/IvDH3jyiv3yx8CdeVXM78of3QevZ5eibA/ICRpPxRy 3jZ97eT17BCbEIYbuNtVZwfSH1AAVVUo9AjZWrCRYB2Gb2kSy+nLNsJpMhWQC4Mfn/Bx F71O4hBcUGyN1lq7IXLhN7/9wT/mnxlwsDpTx7+x+14cM9TMUI/0N0VtkLcAn+/7bw3r gMtnxP7MT6HgwVP9W3Bqf8WmCMmer+bG3gcdzUTiXW8A3OGw5gJkM1ywCBMqDWdHBd3T g1FA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to :mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:from:references:to:subject :cc:arc-authentication-results; bh=Yzc/47iSPKY4BP64O2ynIoHjBH1ENVHB56T7x87HMzQ=; b=Y9r2zxY9LzcGFFCspsYkF1jB05ZEQFpsK6tsi1INd1BVICuVlZXH1k8kP5H1DRNER6 or5VFLDCpn0t5Bp7F4spcPI5k4q69crLbMiXnLraO5xMbYFxY0hETpQhE9xCtM9yCxz9 MyOGHN3Tf503Qtsrg4lFak1VWpMHFixKzs6WXRQ5fPqHrVg61SPmdZ655Tlohy6uiXv6 ddofHxuFXEGGcYBXcUIaZvPvQfT5UPeaycw5mYXpEXpJRSPAFSklrYvQp2Du58bcfxiD RwTKxPtHKE/5XcDDDvQKzOr+LZYEzNpCS+SlKHvaInrqImnSI/oNCa7Ta5BpFG51Ly77 73/w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id c41-v6si4554992plj.704.2018.04.04.17.54.30; Wed, 04 Apr 2018 17:55:16 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752648AbeDEAvT (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 4 Apr 2018 20:51:19 -0400 Received: from lucky1.263xmail.com ([211.157.147.132]:33400 "EHLO lucky1.263xmail.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752582AbeDEAvR (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Apr 2018 20:51:17 -0400 Received: from shawn.lin?rock-chips.com (unknown [192.168.167.172]) by lucky1.263xmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D372968CE1; Thu, 5 Apr 2018 08:51:10 +0800 (CST) X-263anti-spam: KSV:0; X-MAIL-GRAY: 1 X-MAIL-DELIVERY: 0 X-KSVirus-check: 0 X-ABS-CHECKED: 4 Received: from [172.16.12.51] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.263.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id C1480363; Thu, 5 Apr 2018 08:51:09 +0800 (CST) X-IP-DOMAINF: 1 X-RL-SENDER: shawn.lin@rock-chips.com X-FST-TO: zhangfei.gao@linaro.org X-SENDER-IP: 58.22.7.114 X-LOGIN-NAME: shawn.lin@rock-chips.com X-UNIQUE-TAG: X-ATTACHMENT-NUM: 0 X-SENDER: lintao@rock-chips.com X-DNS-TYPE: 0 Received: from [172.16.12.51] (unknown [58.22.7.114]) by smtp.263.net (Postfix) whith ESMTP id 24269CQKDEC; Thu, 05 Apr 2018 08:51:10 +0800 (CST) Cc: shawn.lin@rock-chips.com, Jaehoon Chung , Ulf Hansson , linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Zhangfei Gao Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc: dw_mmc-k3: Fix DDR52 mode by setting required clock divisor To: Ryan Grachek References: <20180329182423.21201-1-ryan@edited.us> From: Shawn Lin Message-ID: Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2018 08:51:14 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org [+ Zhangfei Gao who added support for hi6220] On 2018/4/4 23:31, Ryan Grachek wrote: > On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 6:31 AM, Shawn Lin > wrote: > > On 2018/3/30 2:24, oscardagrach wrote: > > Need at least one line commit body. > > Signed-off-by: oscardagrach > > --- >   drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-k3.c | 10 ++++++++-- >   1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-k3.c > b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-k3.c > index 89cdb3d533bb..efc546cb4db8 100644 > --- a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-k3.c > +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-k3.c > @@ -194,8 +194,14 @@ static void dw_mci_hi6220_set_ios(struct > dw_mci *host, struct mmc_ios *ios) >         int ret; >         unsigned int clock; >   -     clock = (ios->clock <= 25000000) ? 25000000 : ios->clock; > - > +       /* CLKDIV must be 1 for DDR52/8-bit mode */ > +       if (ios->bus_width == MMC_BUS_WIDTH_8 && > +               ios->timing == MMC_TIMING_MMC_DDR52) { > +               mci_writel(host, CLKDIV, 0x1); > +               clock = ios->clock; > +       } else { > +               clock = (ios->clock <= 25000000) ? 25000000 : > ios->clock; > +       } > > > I undertand DDR52/8-bit need CLKDIV fixed 1, but shouldn't the following > change is more sensible? > > if (ios->bus_width == MMC_BUS_WIDTH_8 && ios->timing == > MMC_TIMING_MMC_DDR52) >         clock = ios->clock * 2; > else >         clock = (ios->clock <= 25000000) ? 25000000 : ios->clock; > > > The reason is ios->clock is 52MHz and you could claim 104MHz from the > clock provider and let dw_mmc core take care of the divder to be 1. > Otherwise, you just force it to be DDR52/8-bit with a clk rate of 26MHz. > > >         ret = clk_set_rate(host->biu_clk, clock); >         if (ret) >                 dev_warn(host->dev, "failed to set rate > %uHz\n", clock); > > > For future wise, please use plain mode mail, but not HTML format. > Your feedback is correct. I see the Rockchip dwmmc driver has a similar > implementation. After applying your suggested changes, however, my board > reports "dwmmc_k3 f723d000.dwmmc0: failed to set rate 104000000Hz" > during intialization of eMMC. In addition, I do not see CLKDIV being > set to 1. clk_set_rate fails and I wonder if this is out-of-scope of > the driver. > > If I set CLKDIV where I did prior, with your changes, the device fails > to set the clock and falls back to 52 MHz (26 MHz) and works fine, but > again, CLKDIV is reported as 0 (even though it is 1.) One thing of > interest to note is when I manually set the clock by doing: > (echo 104000000 > /sys/kernel/debug/mmc0/clock) the device reports back > 'mmc_host mmc0: Bus speed (slot 0) = 198400000Hz (slot req 104000000Hz, >  actual 99200000HZ div = 1)' which works reliably and clk_set_rate does > not report any error. > When looking closely into the code, at least dw_mci_hi6220_set_ios goes wrong with the bus_hz, since it should be ciu_clk but not biu_clk. "b" stands for bus, and "c" stands for card IMHO, however bus_hz describs the clock to the card, provided by controller. Does the following patch help? diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-k3.c b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-k3.c index 89cdb3d..9e78cf2 100644 --- a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-k3.c +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-k3.c @@ -194,13 +194,21 @@ static void dw_mci_hi6220_set_ios(struct dw_mci *host, struct mmc_ios *ios) int ret; unsigned int clock; - clock = (ios->clock <= 25000000) ? 25000000 : ios->clock; + if (ios->bus_width == MMC_BUS_WIDTH_8 && + ios->timing == MMC_TIMING_MMC_DDR52) + clock = ios->clock * 2; + else + clock = (ios->clock <= 25000000) ? 25000000 : ios->clock; - ret = clk_set_rate(host->biu_clk, clock); + ret = clk_set_rate(host->ciu_clk, clock); if (ret) dev_warn(host->dev, "failed to set rate %uHz\n", clock); - host->bus_hz = clk_get_rate(host->biu_clk); + clock = clk_get_rate(host->ciu_clk); + if (clock != host->bus_hz) { + host->bus_hz = clock; + host->current_speed = 0; + } } > I am not sure where to begin debugging these clock issues and welcome > any feedback.