Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S272757AbTHPL3c (ORCPT ); Sat, 16 Aug 2003 07:29:32 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S272827AbTHPL3c (ORCPT ); Sat, 16 Aug 2003 07:29:32 -0400 Received: from pub234.cambridge.redhat.com ([213.86.99.234]:10507 "EHLO phoenix.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S272757AbTHPL3b (ORCPT ); Sat, 16 Aug 2003 07:29:31 -0400 Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2003 12:29:28 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Jeff Garzik Cc: Behdad Esfahbod , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: devfs oops on module missing Message-ID: <20030816122928.A30271@infradead.org> Mail-Followup-To: Christoph Hellwig , Jeff Garzik , Behdad Esfahbod , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <3F3E139E.2020300@pobox.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <3F3E139E.2020300@pobox.com>; from jgarzik@pobox.com on Sat, Aug 16, 2003 at 07:21:02AM -0400 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 596 Lines: 14 On Sat, Aug 16, 2003 at 07:21:02AM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: > hmm, isn't it time we deprecated devfs? Well, it is long overdue, but what's the relation to this oops? Even if we deprecate devfs now we'll have to keep it around for two stable series or so until all users switch away. But fortunately I think this bug is already fixed in current BK. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/