Received: by 10.213.65.68 with SMTP id h4csp137905imn; Thu, 5 Apr 2018 19:47:04 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx4+FhvwbGGONiUDFZtKqAdhKPrJ8XpB++5dDUkRUGM4zlWRsJVtfFdESatHtGMGoorw+ZSae X-Received: by 10.98.160.92 with SMTP id r89mr18885559pfe.235.1522982824716; Thu, 05 Apr 2018 19:47:04 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1522982824; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=o8WNEWj0MuNjfjeag/PEMgu1lU0S/L6WKoJMGG73k4L9H+saI64bKrUTLOvXiNhCuI g9osBQ5PjVyiOeKTQI+hi1rXDT9Dm043A6qgFXZa8H7OAKeSm4YmPqILkZ/uCOdKjq+M KZmR7IAAv+gJAEUFqxLZh+UM7YHMdMtzDNpUEgr1MqhjVHvAmsMVmYOffhspljU6hkSt w4KCbW1M5ii1XM4U1YtgXRrCiaF8aC5foyafKDG15KHfvfzpGpMMb8DE9tC+afBFyjkV wlLM2HdNE9lutkgvO9MGBe9Yijtg6MFMfMh/TbjCP5QtNwNQPJ83Wkm8/bsgk8UohEl2 3MLQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date:dmarc-filter:arc-authentication-results; bh=5PfhYqor5AUdqzmHnHi8nZ4RwzpgvDF0WsdAA38X2LM=; b=K60I5ghtoGMYBhvRyp9ennim07Hj+Du4xgcvqeYNuj+fn/yxtd9wkGG7MpNDFSsY0V +Ce30AJg91FZZSIXRKANNcQ0ClTS39RwszUVZgVlz0SZUOVu5sEYiPHI1caGdXYzrMQ2 UvQBUBOI59qMbLCfmKby93Jmd/sEQKEV/aWE94azzItQclmKSaTFCWA1ftKLy87FbUXq 1w/RcXxAea9Y+lKEDvP+uiJErFRj4/ExdUeihg65oC2zRY9XxqFVhNYpB8tDyBUD2wKL BkZ6dxxs5C0TinDLpsr7B0+vHQHKzsFi9Qh613Us7fQkXjeBlDsFwu5wDTrkaNNg7qM+ Jikg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 32-v6si9622982pla.348.2018.04.05.19.46.20; Thu, 05 Apr 2018 19:47:04 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751415AbeDFCoU (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 5 Apr 2018 22:44:20 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:39130 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751278AbeDFCoT (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Apr 2018 22:44:19 -0400 Received: from localhost (LFbn-NCY-1-193-82.w83-194.abo.wanadoo.fr [83.194.41.82]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CFC1B217CE; Fri, 6 Apr 2018 02:44:17 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org CFC1B217CE Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=frederic@kernel.org Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2018 04:44:14 +0200 From: Frederic Weisbecker To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Linux PM , Peter Zijlstra , Frederic Weisbecker , Thomas Gleixner , Paul McKenney , Thomas Ilsche , Doug Smythies , Rik van Riel , Aubrey Li , Mike Galbraith , LKML , Len Brown Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 05/10] cpuidle: Return nohz hint from cpuidle_select() Message-ID: <20180406024413.GB4400@lerouge> References: <1736751.LdhZHb50jq@aspire.rjw.lan> <5818594.T4StF86Hkt@aspire.rjw.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5818594.T4StF86Hkt@aspire.rjw.lan> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Apr 04, 2018 at 10:39:50AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > From: Rafael J. Wysocki > Index: linux-pm/kernel/time/tick-sched.c > =================================================================== > --- linux-pm.orig/kernel/time/tick-sched.c > +++ linux-pm/kernel/time/tick-sched.c > @@ -991,6 +991,20 @@ void tick_nohz_irq_exit(void) > } > > /** > + * tick_nohz_idle_got_tick - Check whether or not the tick handler has run > + */ > +bool tick_nohz_idle_got_tick(void) > +{ > + struct tick_sched *ts = this_cpu_ptr(&tick_cpu_sched); > + > + if (ts->inidle > 1) { > + ts->inidle = 1; > + return true; > + } > + return false; > +} > + > +/** > * tick_nohz_get_sleep_length - return the length of the current sleep > * > * Called from power state control code with interrupts disabled > @@ -1101,6 +1115,9 @@ static void tick_nohz_handler(struct clo > struct pt_regs *regs = get_irq_regs(); > ktime_t now = ktime_get(); > > + if (ts->inidle) > + ts->inidle = 2; > + You can move that to tick_sched_do_timer() to avoid code duplication. Also these constants are very opaque. And even with proper symbols it wouldn't look right to extend ts->inidle that way. Perhaps you should add a field such as ts->got_idle_tick under the boolean fields after the below patch: -- From c7b2ca5a4c512517ddfeb9f922d5999f82542ced Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Frederic Weisbecker Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2018 04:32:37 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] nohz: Gather tick_sched booleans under a common flag field This optimize the space and leave plenty of room for further flags. Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker --- kernel/time/tick-sched.h | 10 ++++++---- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-sched.h b/kernel/time/tick-sched.h index 954b43d..38f24dc 100644 --- a/kernel/time/tick-sched.h +++ b/kernel/time/tick-sched.h @@ -45,14 +45,17 @@ struct tick_sched { struct hrtimer sched_timer; unsigned long check_clocks; enum tick_nohz_mode nohz_mode; + + unsigned int inidle : 1; + unsigned int tick_stopped : 1; + unsigned int idle_active : 1; + unsigned int do_timer_last : 1; + ktime_t last_tick; ktime_t next_tick; - int inidle; - int tick_stopped; unsigned long idle_jiffies; unsigned long idle_calls; unsigned long idle_sleeps; - int idle_active; ktime_t idle_entrytime; ktime_t idle_waketime; ktime_t idle_exittime; @@ -62,7 +65,6 @@ struct tick_sched { unsigned long last_jiffies; u64 next_timer; ktime_t idle_expires; - int do_timer_last; atomic_t tick_dep_mask; }; -- 2.7.4