Received: by 10.213.65.68 with SMTP id h4csp324730imn; Fri, 6 Apr 2018 00:23:24 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx4+uSCoL8lqI4gqjwkp09G0PiYYYYXapVL6VI8x7o2hgEQ2uww2DS8UqL650RdSnY2ZiF1S2 X-Received: by 10.99.37.70 with SMTP id l67mr17434714pgl.106.1522999404062; Fri, 06 Apr 2018 00:23:24 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1522999404; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=x3ucRQcBn/2F9lUTWaG24Ugz4OfurFv5HulMBpH8L+MhA8OhBLNu1U279eyitXDMHO KeK3tYwuNfm4kIiFdx8JtI4zIe7tqorKxbKumWlKDma21Y7gEcrR7bTULC2EcLN/HWgS JZh71HE0ywIrNorRyf3GuYUhynToVf1+L+bTzrjhSmfk2LyarZB+dAWl4o6mrefpbqx3 er+8KTgBAzd399IE+aVPpvE2N9sk1OaV4YwMuwCsW/c+PCTcfbfOVtaHKNwWF2xyNjSr RzJTCufH5lXna0ZIEB2GbM/QStrD+zV1gniMdT1A9zRISgmGjMkuB6alI5iIZYldkYbw TLgw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date :arc-authentication-results; bh=9beQOLYmAiXIKNx0OUPrs6rNAlqVMKvoEdEP6ADhRAE=; b=bep5pqJ8pb8XzLHP+Sqt/1RdDpUhc0Kk8q+YmSA6620xNibeW0fW346V5GDhWTdjlJ lK35XFsPQtbhQ/x+fUCTjOIZzGh2zI67mN9UEmQkt9rl06pxMg4cGsjqfRXicY/rGtJ3 GcQDyQ2BZSEH8ZpAtf3yjlN4x67TWKOo4q2aPuSIyd7WcIkJutuFdt6lWorapDc3unaE Nn4QldXlwGJOP/JjpczFtFb+ebizXPiIMSAM4owTYNN5z3AvfA5/nadmyz4Fid/aXanf 7zW47zhu/XIMIfSygWdwlPbjhVcoH3XwcnqxSAbNUsdyEmPye0yrNgz0O/VVKp2J8ZVs LWfA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id j5si7286393pff.178.2018.04.06.00.23.09; Fri, 06 Apr 2018 00:23:24 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751435AbeDFHWA (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 6 Apr 2018 03:22:00 -0400 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:55554 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750739AbeDFHV6 (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Apr 2018 03:21:58 -0400 Received: from localhost (LFbn-1-12247-202.w90-92.abo.wanadoo.fr [90.92.61.202]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8EC49CC9; Fri, 6 Apr 2018 07:21:49 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2018 09:21:49 +0200 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Ben Hutchings Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner , Hans de Goede , Marc Zyngier , Sasha Levin Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.4 15/97] genirq: Use irqd_get_trigger_type to compare the trigger type for shared IRQs Message-ID: <20180406072149.GA15735@kroah.com> References: <20180323094157.535925724@linuxfoundation.org> <20180323094158.346866234@linuxfoundation.org> <1522765036.2654.99.camel@codethink.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <1522765036.2654.99.camel@codethink.co.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Apr 03, 2018 at 03:17:16PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Fri, 2018-03-23 at 10:54 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > 4.4-stable review patch.??If anyone has any objections, please let me know. > > > > ------------------ > > > > From: Hans de Goede > > > > > > [ Upstream commit 382bd4de61827dbaaf5fb4fb7b1f4be4a86505e7 ] > > > > When requesting a shared irq with IRQF_TRIGGER_NONE then the irqaction > > flags get filled with the trigger type from the irq_data: > > > > ????????if (!(new->flags & IRQF_TRIGGER_MASK)) > > ????????????????new->flags |= irqd_get_trigger_type(&desc->irq_data); > > The code above was added to __setup_irq() in 4.8, so I don't think this > fix is needed in 3.18 or 4.4; and I suspect it might cause a regression > there. Already reverted, thanks! greg k-h