Received: by 10.213.65.68 with SMTP id h4csp670627imn; Fri, 6 Apr 2018 07:04:42 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx4+ITqESSFMLOgyNdjTGW8xYp29KbUL+x1Kk2cuTqcTZa4yBXCbgbzABUypQn4M9ACzVuN7D X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:2983:: with SMTP id h3-v6mr27962300plb.80.1523023482277; Fri, 06 Apr 2018 07:04:42 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1523023482; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=EmlkqQhHTcKPJ9JwGDAHvYd/hAC8KNephsblT79rmVIvyPf7DS5FNaxbWXfTNLaRPp eHgZ3TsbLESvy0Rps7JLlF4ovc/O4LJNwKlXl6HPd+veZU8jzwzmqJ7MmXolfYlcHTYA PRqJJ3Am4lIIJYfzva1M9jZ3J87f76JD0SWu9QN6y/azhbcycLVHVjwW7j2EIagXByUc e1C9zq+/RMMQLXA/eCwddcoA8j5jn+Fp/sFW0jBxbyPWmxckBylykXIcD7aElQIQclrz wXXHVyIYKtuBRVKSZLo0C6+DUikU6Iex9JZjpmyyBFBZRM7XhEkKCNdZ0z5Rj5su7x0W qKyQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:mime-version:user-agent:references :in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from :arc-authentication-results; bh=lyAPvxR/qzwek4OdU/ygvEyt50S27r5zJTsAxJlF5XA=; b=YllgWKVbzCNYehSS21o2bfjoUD8fiI7kSVN+Itr+jdaN2R4JwPIypqxZeWZjzZiB+y 8McCJ/BCImgv56FQX1WpbzOjqYMUMur4K76pngpUdoqLfInumMIRqErzCg+HwhpJwHzn QwhaBXJ0zIntvA74thtcaFQNKADHM7cQPawU8taXR6ZVB2A+NzXpUQoTpXzrirF8+6V2 hrTF7fLsHEcolwsKN5C2x5NQ32IUqKOqVMwRwiAHQbrmUFK78dXEhFtSwbBmqz1LnrkV 4pvvCs6lsJ5YnMibUje9zL7ASxg4akk74QMdj5dJHYoL++Bamz4si1iG5EpVmGvZw3sZ 1byQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 1-v6si8362564plk.104.2018.04.06.07.04.28; Fri, 06 Apr 2018 07:04:42 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756501AbeDFNl4 (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 6 Apr 2018 09:41:56 -0400 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:36622 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756461AbeDFNlr (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Apr 2018 09:41:47 -0400 Received: from localhost (LFbn-1-12247-202.w90-92.abo.wanadoo.fr [90.92.61.202]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0A876C64; Fri, 6 Apr 2018 13:41:46 +0000 (UTC) From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Steffen Klassert Subject: [PATCH 4.15 30/72] xfrm: Refuse to insert 32 bit userspace socket policies on 64 bit systems Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2018 15:24:05 +0200 Message-Id: <20180406084351.843360642@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.0 In-Reply-To: <20180406084349.367583460@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20180406084349.367583460@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.65 X-stable: review MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 4.15-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Steffen Klassert commit 19d7df69fdb2636856dc8919de72fc1bf8f79598 upstream. We don't have a compat layer for xfrm, so userspace and kernel structures have different sizes in this case. This results in a broken configuration, so refuse to configure socket policies when trying to insert from 32 bit userspace as we do it already with policies inserted via netlink. Reported-and-tested-by: syzbot+e1a1577ca8bcb47b769a@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c | 5 +++++ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) --- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c +++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c @@ -2056,6 +2056,11 @@ int xfrm_user_policy(struct sock *sk, in struct xfrm_mgr *km; struct xfrm_policy *pol = NULL; +#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT + if (in_compat_syscall()) + return -EOPNOTSUPP; +#endif + if (!optval && !optlen) { xfrm_sk_policy_insert(sk, XFRM_POLICY_IN, NULL); xfrm_sk_policy_insert(sk, XFRM_POLICY_OUT, NULL);