Received: by 10.213.65.68 with SMTP id h4csp729219imn; Fri, 6 Apr 2018 07:59:23 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx4/xs/6N9QxT2MeyXSY6BBbz/MlZOObV6EGCCPfUBrNRapztUbpcPEpuZF/iL39AwOD/zAG+ X-Received: by 10.98.156.152 with SMTP id u24mr20683402pfk.74.1523026763034; Fri, 06 Apr 2018 07:59:23 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1523026763; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=tbIM+h/0A1+3Bz0yujvLUeB0Q4AdsZ2IIl1hyVylM4SwSKrUEm+SNRCX1LoSnVCxDL YpLtYf6YdT5DMMRIqzmYoWfCqcuosA4rdx7DMtfyjU+RwGQZMVrXUkq6YBJ01/1R50Hn OC5/IP8QpQjKRo/YNAiVzrCzuxE9LM9DExJP3jjPj8bumE9I8Tq3Jh48pYtWAqcjb3FT usBNDw1yKekHUbkJiu4UEso++FYyUKz/jg3pkychW5FaxnaQHtq3OT8iVd5QbmTHatm4 6fABvdyxac8CJStxQqODH7X/Kkyj0In/GfSFsCX/XBAPknEMjpJbT4pMOeA32TueZbLv XxLg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:mime-version:user-agent:references :in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from :arc-authentication-results; bh=HJjjb8DxBd2/3+wzbM6ueXkbT4xKMieUkJwpFNeggKU=; b=DM1HnEF1PeSd1WIOC2sH4pFFHbVqZic2/UvnQZVbn+jIZXTUZ4iVuV5O7mLy7/2l6W 4TtGmsYvT9iABESYl56r9T3rmp4J+izjvwT4+z035qEl72/3Czi0bBjXVchVP9LtNhlW WeVgRyxT3E2hIEVQ9NKHb1QpvRQqK/paQ+rrnZZh9OxlkB8s4z1bEexEwfcoR+TeDWQl +8j6s+WGFswEQGvOmpbpuJVquC16hIcmXiHk07jIqpHR/u9JUZVp4HGlCzw3fyYE3wrZ ZB5LB5ZjXzj2F1JpMTLbDRA9i1MIWCbAf/viPX2r5mdoQ+i0k931S5BTNOeJjxmL27zs 0+Eg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id v2-v6si8717015plp.295.2018.04.06.07.59.09; Fri, 06 Apr 2018 07:59:23 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755181AbeDFNbg (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 6 Apr 2018 09:31:36 -0400 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:56530 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755149AbeDFNbd (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Apr 2018 09:31:33 -0400 Received: from localhost (LFbn-1-12247-202.w90-92.abo.wanadoo.fr [90.92.61.202]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 01FBFD85; Fri, 6 Apr 2018 13:31:32 +0000 (UTC) From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Mike Frysinger Subject: [PATCH 4.4 57/72] vt: change SGR 21 to follow the standards Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2018 15:23:58 +0200 Message-Id: <20180406084310.094851516@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.0 In-Reply-To: <20180406084305.210085169@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20180406084305.210085169@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.65 X-stable: review MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Mike Frysinger commit 65d9982d7e523a1a8e7c9af012da0d166f72fc56 upstream. ECMA-48 [1] (aka ISO 6429) has defined SGR 21 as "doubly underlined" since at least March 1984. The Linux kernel has treated it as SGR 22 "normal intensity" since it was added in Linux-0.96b in June 1992. Before that, it was simply ignored. Other terminal emulators have either ignored it, or treat it as double underline now. xterm for example added support in its 304 release (May 2014) [2] where it was previously ignoring it. Changing this behavior shouldn't be an issue: - It isn't a named capability in ncurses's terminfo database, so no script is using libtinfo/libcurses to look this up, or using tput to query & output the right sequence. - Any script assuming SGR 21 will reset intensity in all terminals already do not work correctly on non-Linux VTs (including running under screen/tmux/etc...). - If someone has written a script that only runs in the Linux VT, and they're using SGR 21 (instead of SGR 22), the output should still be readable. imo it's important to change this as the Linux VT's non-conformance is sometimes used as an argument for other terminal emulators to not implement SGR 21 at all, or do so incorrectly. [1]: https://www.ecma-international.org/publications/standards/Ecma-048.htm [2]: https://github.com/ThomasDickey/xterm-snapshots/commit/2fd29cb98d214cb536bcafbee00bc73b3f1eeb9d Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger Cc: stable Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- drivers/tty/vt/vt.c | 6 +++++- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) --- a/drivers/tty/vt/vt.c +++ b/drivers/tty/vt/vt.c @@ -1312,6 +1312,11 @@ static void csi_m(struct vc_data *vc) case 3: vc->vc_italic = 1; break; + case 21: + /* + * No console drivers support double underline, so + * convert it to a single underline. + */ case 4: vc->vc_underline = 1; break; @@ -1348,7 +1353,6 @@ static void csi_m(struct vc_data *vc) vc->vc_disp_ctrl = 1; vc->vc_toggle_meta = 1; break; - case 21: case 22: vc->vc_intensity = 1; break;