Received: by 10.213.65.68 with SMTP id h4csp736000imn; Fri, 6 Apr 2018 08:04:16 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx4967pYRpsdp/wvbLo9CvCItKcJMDDtMWh5Dd+SYheKIYR1wmettIfEqzzKZ/yKCVsMqfdh/ X-Received: by 10.101.83.198 with SMTP id z6mr14104959pgr.105.1523027056846; Fri, 06 Apr 2018 08:04:16 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1523027056; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=igJRgDU9YXy7jezjPejtL6Zo8mXLIEe7p85C1JyZPvIjQd7htwxWSILMc6qV9U9H4T ccINFAasG+Wcen09WGdM7bEaJWqVJNxRF1kBW9Su5y9SJhJ2DuMv1XcZL3hjcAjjDqCC b1l+1Xo8bR0VAscK8IS/vIV8vJu510q73jhygBfMMCxIV/0WoU5X+xc0wckfmvFHMLIG qc1mRy8OqtTOGfhvUnvJ9RgWFFceKwt0fT3D0HfmsrA6kD4yGaRicMkdjZlRwzucFukW 3/c8YfbhbBD0xMaN34VtZOUKMfvKkViYer4tGSmbcR3EyTcVZtEPghglfrQGuWlId7Tn AxGg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:mime-version:user-agent:references :in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from :arc-authentication-results; bh=YFg5p5pI6/j6L52zm8IV5rxtEyTOzlUelDGcMyfEy1Y=; b=TAEFAR6WuCxjTXO7CvA/G/1G1r0L6IJLSIG1P1H/YOM8fBRWXpWVkaKSJYueJJmHyO h1ExZZvx7sAjhYS/0yRVxzyUr9aIs4xKG3OVRsK+cmQKGbDGH6j9o8uk/QozZ4CMTBpO J6PZBm2AozLLFcT+s+umGpl5Aaxdex6ellifkhKk1wqU2DEw208vOpl4Pl8GdcfrwXBj oVHbs2cJ7QQvhcoF7vT3dRhA39NzPbt7OvjvSL4+15oS2u1kzMfKE6Sy+OvdBJaDTs49 skSiR/zNLo7qpnwbbepYnd4iscrYBqrXiJviwQsrfX3sW+6clYfIsp/P1ljxB1qNR319 TEEA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id p5si7146761pgu.158.2018.04.06.08.04.02; Fri, 06 Apr 2018 08:04:16 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754966AbeDFNaq (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 6 Apr 2018 09:30:46 -0400 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:56218 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754613AbeDFNao (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Apr 2018 09:30:44 -0400 Received: from localhost (LFbn-1-12247-202.w90-92.abo.wanadoo.fr [90.92.61.202]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E927DD48; Fri, 6 Apr 2018 13:30:43 +0000 (UTC) From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Steffen Klassert Subject: [PATCH 4.4 38/72] xfrm: Refuse to insert 32 bit userspace socket policies on 64 bit systems Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2018 15:23:39 +0200 Message-Id: <20180406084308.351558223@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.0 In-Reply-To: <20180406084305.210085169@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20180406084305.210085169@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.65 X-stable: review MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Steffen Klassert commit 19d7df69fdb2636856dc8919de72fc1bf8f79598 upstream. We don't have a compat layer for xfrm, so userspace and kernel structures have different sizes in this case. This results in a broken configuration, so refuse to configure socket policies when trying to insert from 32 bit userspace as we do it already with policies inserted via netlink. Reported-and-tested-by: syzbot+e1a1577ca8bcb47b769a@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert [use is_compat_task() - gregkh] Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c | 5 +++++ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) --- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c +++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c @@ -1845,6 +1845,11 @@ int xfrm_user_policy(struct sock *sk, in struct xfrm_mgr *km; struct xfrm_policy *pol = NULL; +#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT + if (is_compat_task()) + return -EOPNOTSUPP; +#endif + if (!optval && !optlen) { xfrm_sk_policy_insert(sk, XFRM_POLICY_IN, NULL); xfrm_sk_policy_insert(sk, XFRM_POLICY_OUT, NULL);