Received: by 10.213.65.68 with SMTP id h4csp796214imn; Fri, 6 Apr 2018 09:03:48 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx492oXq+WDwKtO8Q/0/iHTWGBYfdT3yET8MumrMo7txrzNu3VZU0p1uo/Y9C2mqmvpqbd1/4 X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:7446:: with SMTP id e6-v6mr28532380plt.159.1523030628890; Fri, 06 Apr 2018 09:03:48 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1523030628; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=up2QvijtZ9mc20vxwCO94+B78432rCyNMuM3eiKOYAsZWTcgLExfze+qyn5G9HPHI3 LQDJbF6QjkYPXATwG1b3Nb+kFN8QdbfWp8gRt4drd6Z+aVWyH27S9jgzQDlFkJtwb4Eo exwdOYGSL6CaOf5wauu34mRtmJTVcgN64V80FNHtghJD5wBN1gFOrevNRLEfaJ+lJc3b T9nTgnAT4nbPCXyt3Q9JCUFB9/L51lzffc9E+MyeyMTpY7lkMPAEFlLV5/n8zoXPy5Fx kgEMAzWa/x+pvtviMRFcN2rMU7o33TvdYR+3/4beOrf1wEy9LNm8XToO+q1GvDAS5Tw1 DPxQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:organization:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date:dkim-signature:dkim-signature :arc-authentication-results; bh=6AWO1Kk4AmY1FFXubqOHmCCT5BBjqH2phrBABmRgNuo=; b=KHnM9wFL+LYxausAG7htko61/zx9JV8dpO6wUMBn4ibLZdHMCSgfeQlv+Rfxg+kYDE DsY6sOexXT0wNSukRSjN0hiII9OG2KfrfpKG5IvG++EPIGJGtmTBWVT0MdcDJInsStbq rUKvLiNrPdG/agKGAaJujxqkr73FwcHGexgG+I9NXsQpCQBlaDSqGFGGSt8EMkstA3t4 SLaVUYzygAx9Y9HvO7OQ0hzg/BQsicWU//oEHf7Fzbb+mRQxxJQghQ4YW8TnmzeA5nDi qr9UskLnoLdiKkEPv1uvSHQvBnXa7V5KGgcIMNHQ9qruEDOWZsm064K2uDf7H+97v8O+ nRDw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=temperror (no key for signature) header.i=@animalcreek.com header.s=mesmtp header.b=BOzSpZ4B; dkim=pass header.i=@messagingengine.com header.s=fm2 header.b=ZXGBs6wu; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 126si7189805pgd.375.2018.04.06.09.03.34; Fri, 06 Apr 2018 09:03:48 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=temperror (no key for signature) header.i=@animalcreek.com header.s=mesmtp header.b=BOzSpZ4B; dkim=pass header.i=@messagingengine.com header.s=fm2 header.b=ZXGBs6wu; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751849AbeDFQBh (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 6 Apr 2018 12:01:37 -0400 Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.29]:57855 "EHLO out5-smtp.messagingengine.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751465AbeDFQBf (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Apr 2018 12:01:35 -0400 Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAD3A20BA5; Fri, 6 Apr 2018 12:01:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 06 Apr 2018 12:01:34 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=animalcreek.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s= mesmtp; bh=6AWO1Kk4AmY1FFXubqOHmCCT5BBjqH2phrBABmRgNuo=; b=BOzSp Z4BnPcXnY47sB/7Cu1ScSiKlaAWGOzx9/iPoVn1Pb1FBkh/cv13ZzIImcoHSzCFZ fvAVo2ydfBsswJr5TNK8LAqrE0Cir6j555+JKAwvg9f9facBWtyfFldOQYB279oz k9TMqrMnCyOX4/RGm315xgvfOoKwHiWTu5k8VY= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=6AWO1Kk4AmY1FFXubqOHmCCT5BBjq H2phrBABmRgNuo=; b=ZXGBs6wuQ3ZuMkHmz9Bpefu3DYwENMV1fgZwMd7Sfbr/j yL7DSyZVsZtoiTIgA64Sq0j2glikrv2Ei8YuFoG4C+gEjg+ejr9fs2KQC69YpUgT x8jcEFZTUlNPPYQU8QPPgKQZNosd+uq6XbgMe1nQaA7fjxwiflYz4ST9qyVGBUQ/ gexQWeM29DhBr/RTpdvAgS4ciaozlptHcnoOMNP4/qp1FmAJphDn2aGI2Wm+FpCw B/K2g/DoVbhyEORCVL9pDYNcvhQ/jvGd6kCLqMjnXbH9OA7RocmgMfremUb2ojnm Iu9XmqigRhxSGd4xsun50MZOlP/eqj/95LNVP/5oA== X-ME-Sender: Received: from blue.animalcreek.com (ip68-3-119-204.ph.ph.cox.net [68.3.119.204]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 84E6CE4437; Fri, 6 Apr 2018 12:01:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: by blue.animalcreek.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 0A3C7A22835; Fri, 6 Apr 2018 09:01:34 -0700 (MST) Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2018 09:01:34 -0700 From: Mark Greer To: Viresh Kumar Cc: Mark Greer , Gaurav Dhingra , Johan Hovold , Alex Elder , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: greybus: Fix warning to limit chars per line Message-ID: <20180406160134.GB21252@animalcreek.com> References: <20180403183246.GA23438@stallman> <20180405221941.GA21308@animalcreek.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Organization: Animal Creek Technologies, Inc. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 10:52:17AM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 3:49 AM, Mark Greer wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 04, 2018 at 12:02:46AM +0530, Gaurav Dhingra wrote: > >> Wrap comment to fix warning "prefer a maximum 75 chars per line" > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Gaurav Dhingra > >> --- > >> drivers/staging/greybus/audio_codec.h | 4 +++- > >> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/drivers/staging/greybus/audio_codec.h b/drivers/staging/greybus/audio_codec.h > >> index a1d5440..01838d9 100644 > >> --- a/drivers/staging/greybus/audio_codec.h > >> +++ b/drivers/staging/greybus/audio_codec.h > >> @@ -23,7 +23,9 @@ enum { > >> NUM_CODEC_DAIS, > >> }; > >> > >> -/* device_type should be same as defined in audio.h (Android media layer) */ > >> +/* device_type should be same as defined in audio.h > > This isn't the right way to write a multi-line comment. It should be like: > > /* > * XXXX > * XXXX > */ Ugh, yeah, you're right. I must have been sleeping. Mark --