Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] mm/vmscan: Don't change pgdat state on base of a
 single LRU list state.
To:     Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc:     Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
        Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
        Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>, linux-mm@kvack.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org
References: <20180323152029.11084-1-aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>
 <20180323152029.11084-4-aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>
 <20180406162835.GD20806@cmpxchg.org>
From:   Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>
Message-ID: <312906df-80c4-aaaf-3d0f-caaeeceb9f39@virtuozzo.com>
Date:   Fri, 6 Apr 2018 20:25:10 +0300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/52.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20180406162835.GD20806@cmpxchg.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Received-SPF: None (protection.outlook.com: virtuozzo.com does not designate
 permitted sender hosts)
SpamDiagnosticOutput: 1:99
SpamDiagnosticMetadata: NSPM
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 06 Apr 2018 17:24:25.8536 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 25b5ca18-8432-4c91-73b0-08d59be33f79
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: 0bc7f26d-0264-416e-a6fc-8352af79c58f
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DB7PR08MB3260
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org


On 04/06/2018 07:28 PM, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> 
> This isn't quite equivalent to what we have right now.
> 
> Yes, nr_dirty, nr_unqueued_dirty and nr_congested apply to file pages
> only. That part is about waking the flushers and avoiding writing
> files in 4k chunks from reclaim context. So those numbers do need to
> be compared against scanned *file* pages.
> 
> But nr_writeback and nr_immediate is about throttling reclaim when we
> hit too many pages under writeout, and that applies to both file and
> anonymous/swap pages. We do want to throttle on swapout, too.
> 
> So nr_writeback needs to check against all nr_taken, not just file.
> 

Agreed, the fix bellow. It causes conflict in the next 4/4 patch,
so I'll just send v3 with all fixes folded.

---
 mm/vmscan.c | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index 4d848b8df01f..c45497475e84 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -124,6 +124,7 @@ struct scan_control {
 		unsigned int writeback;
 		unsigned int immediate;
 		unsigned int file_taken;
+		unsigned int taken;
 	} nr;
 };
 
@@ -1771,6 +1772,7 @@ shrink_inactive_list(unsigned long nr_to_scan, struct lruvec *lruvec,
 	sc->nr.unqueued_dirty += stat.nr_unqueued_dirty;
 	sc->nr.writeback += stat.nr_writeback;
 	sc->nr.immediate += stat.nr_immediate;
+	sc->nr.taken += nr_taken;
 	if (file)
 		sc->nr.file_taken += nr_taken;
 
@@ -2553,7 +2555,7 @@ static bool shrink_node(pg_data_t *pgdat, struct scan_control *sc)
 		 * number of pages under pages flagged for immediate reclaim and
 		 * stall if any are encountered in the nr_immediate check below.
 		 */
-		if (sc->nr.writeback && sc->nr.writeback == sc->nr.file_taken)
+		if (sc->nr.writeback && sc->nr.writeback == sc->nr.taken)
 			set_bit(PGDAT_WRITEBACK, &pgdat->flags);
 
 		/*
-- 
2.16.1