Received: by 10.213.65.68 with SMTP id h4csp1148762imn; Sat, 7 Apr 2018 19:25:14 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx4/MCJ7ieqvY5DCbyJKidH9oqnCuW3wYgXI8Z8Wh4V964BsHgEm2+YqNcm+z/nj+Cw6uMgKb X-Received: by 10.99.95.84 with SMTP id t81mr20590721pgb.400.1523154314158; Sat, 07 Apr 2018 19:25:14 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1523154314; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=uf++ON5otqFc7F7id7OfiTU4yskGtIbEoqivC779DegQOXpaz+J8f8mulZUGJNPm/G K227nHtYTc3t3SHCeB6l7R0W8fnq1gUf3AqyKYcq5yT6re67IGwB1qpACPQl7V5te8gg 7cC3ZGewddAB/fVYvBKJ0HE1pcmFWiVQzgGyIMk5V3BZ8FjvGE9CTnG/lH8WR1mPeU8K 7tgvKFiYjf6DSgoiclDVcn6kwhIxkN2sJeueHsJaZzalOPdozDrDgo+fhtA9PVepqvii rTh6QmDTiWpE5/LWOOqns0PWei6KVo37jzBIm2qFMLjnlcghNdVPhzLyAjya/bZTjg8j fWRQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date:arc-authentication-results; bh=pPOwnJeQONtkhAHdyPX7cOzyI61lvGHvOjZ6mWyW20g=; b=o4wm8WmA6glA+jeoFpeCTZcwqfbM0oCZN3TNf8BpT6VuijyDLTcvIEf1oA2PnjnGau yAxgOta02yVZuPLPdSJ9JN8ody7SeOX2+34opXXj9KbW1K7bs0TusxMhFRspPZ/5F8AI nYPryN7BzkwnkJOBJ3JJsDpmppA+WQZOITnDFNR/A+ZXoGeriiG+wWJAdTCpuWSqE7Yv Zne232Q1GRbZHjdAFzVzcn8PDAoTYHSE9N9rq9BmUDIyeUizHSAUaI/UYzGtWE4sVeEF Aqwsj4VQZY/ovwZrO5FW25Q1OxxS1nVCNty7ltUKzYq89w+IFuEakofOd9EfNOs0aQ6Y 8W2Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id n11-v6si11500699plg.565.2018.04.07.19.24.37; Sat, 07 Apr 2018 19:25:14 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752498AbeDHCU1 (ORCPT + 99 others); Sat, 7 Apr 2018 22:20:27 -0400 Received: from zeniv.linux.org.uk ([195.92.253.2]:39180 "EHLO ZenIV.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752068AbeDHCU0 (ORCPT ); Sat, 7 Apr 2018 22:20:26 -0400 Received: from viro by ZenIV.linux.org.uk with local (Exim 4.87 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1f4zvw-0003Ba-4t; Sun, 08 Apr 2018 02:20:03 +0000 Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2018 03:19:56 +0100 From: Al Viro To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Linux-Next Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Mateusz Guzik Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the vfs tree Message-ID: <20180408021945.GF30522@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> References: <20180319170627.04eae43b@canb.auug.org.au> <20180403122629.688f2cab@canb.auug.org.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180403122629.688f2cab@canb.auug.org.au> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.1 (2017-09-22) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Apr 03, 2018 at 12:26:29PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Al, > > On Mon, 19 Mar 2018 17:06:27 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > > After merging the vfs tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allnoconfig) > > failed like this: > > > > fs/super.c: In function 'do_thaw_all_callback': > > fs/super.c:942:3: error: implicit declaration of function 'emergency_thaw_bdev'; did you mean 'emergency_remount'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] > > emergency_thaw_bdev(sb); > > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > emergency_remount > > > > Caused by commit > > > > 92afc556e622 ("buffer.c: call thaw_super during emergency thaw") > > > > I have reverted that commit for today. > > I am still doing that revert ... That's interesting, seeing that this commit is *not* in #for-next and 08fdc8a0138a should not have that problem...