Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
From:   Sasha Levin <Alexander.Levin@microsoft.com>
To:     "stable@vger.kernel.org" <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
CC:     Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
        Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
        Sasha Levin <Alexander.Levin@microsoft.com>
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL for 4.9 118/293] irqchip/gic-v3-its: Fix MSI alias
 accounting
Thread-Topic: [PATCH AUTOSEL for 4.9 118/293] irqchip/gic-v3-its: Fix MSI
 alias accounting
Thread-Index: AQHTz5kdgdhSPSoT1U+lLdM5wBcGVA==
Date:   Mon, 9 Apr 2018 00:24:25 +0000
Message-ID: <20180409002239.163177-118-alexander.levin@microsoft.com>
References: <20180409002239.163177-1-alexander.levin@microsoft.com>
In-Reply-To: <20180409002239.163177-1-alexander.levin@microsoft.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: microsoft.com does not designate
 permitted sender hosts)
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 2a4cd51f-5603-4ca6-e6f4-08d59db0fc56
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 09 Apr 2018 00:24:25.2531
 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 72f988bf-86f1-41af-91ab-2d7cd011db47
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DM5PR2101MB1032
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>

[ Upstream commit 3403b0259d152c3ca67b32bb710f826bc17c0d16 ]

The call to pci_for_each_dma_alias() in the ITS PCI code has aroused
suspicion in the past, and upon closer inspection does turn out to be
completely backwards. Rather than iterating through each RID alias of
the given device, what we actually want to be doing here is iterating
through all the *other* devices which may also alias the same RID, in
order to size the table for the worst case.

Do the right thing by ignoring the initial DMA aliases themselves and
just using that walk to detect an aliasing bridge, then walking back
down the bus topology as necessary to actually count everything else.

Our alias handling still isn't perfect, since we don't account for the
cases of certain bridges only taking ownership of transactions under
particular circumstances, but without completely reworking the ITS code
to cope with the notion of multiple DevIDs per device, it'll have to do.

Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@microsoft.com>
---
 drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its-pci-msi.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++------------=
----
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its-pci-msi.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq=
-gic-v3-its-pci-msi.c
index aee1c60d7ab5..77931214d954 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its-pci-msi.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its-pci-msi.c
@@ -41,27 +41,22 @@ static struct irq_chip its_msi_irq_chip =3D {
 	.irq_write_msi_msg	=3D pci_msi_domain_write_msg,
 };
=20
-struct its_pci_alias {
-	struct pci_dev	*pdev;
-	u32		count;
-};
-
-static int its_pci_msi_vec_count(struct pci_dev *pdev)
+static int its_pci_msi_vec_count(struct pci_dev *pdev, void *data)
 {
-	int msi, msix;
+	int msi, msix, *count =3D data;
=20
 	msi =3D max(pci_msi_vec_count(pdev), 0);
 	msix =3D max(pci_msix_vec_count(pdev), 0);
+	*count +=3D max(msi, msix);
=20
-	return max(msi, msix);
+	return 0;
 }
=20
 static int its_get_pci_alias(struct pci_dev *pdev, u16 alias, void *data)
 {
-	struct its_pci_alias *dev_alias =3D data;
+	struct pci_dev **alias_dev =3D data;
=20
-	if (pdev !=3D dev_alias->pdev)
-		dev_alias->count +=3D its_pci_msi_vec_count(pdev);
+	*alias_dev =3D pdev;
=20
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -69,9 +64,9 @@ static int its_get_pci_alias(struct pci_dev *pdev, u16 al=
ias, void *data)
 static int its_pci_msi_prepare(struct irq_domain *domain, struct device *d=
ev,
 			       int nvec, msi_alloc_info_t *info)
 {
-	struct pci_dev *pdev;
-	struct its_pci_alias dev_alias;
+	struct pci_dev *pdev, *alias_dev;
 	struct msi_domain_info *msi_info;
+	int alias_count =3D 0;
=20
 	if (!dev_is_pci(dev))
 		return -EINVAL;
@@ -79,16 +74,20 @@ static int its_pci_msi_prepare(struct irq_domain *domai=
n, struct device *dev,
 	msi_info =3D msi_get_domain_info(domain->parent);
=20
 	pdev =3D to_pci_dev(dev);
-	dev_alias.pdev =3D pdev;
-	dev_alias.count =3D nvec;
-
-	pci_for_each_dma_alias(pdev, its_get_pci_alias, &dev_alias);
+	/*
+	 * If pdev is downstream of any aliasing bridges, take an upper
+	 * bound of how many other vectors could map to the same DevID.
+	 */
+	pci_for_each_dma_alias(pdev, its_get_pci_alias, &alias_dev);
+	if (alias_dev !=3D pdev && alias_dev->subordinate)
+		pci_walk_bus(alias_dev->subordinate, its_pci_msi_vec_count,
+			     &alias_count);
=20
 	/* ITS specific DeviceID, as the core ITS ignores dev. */
 	info->scratchpad[0].ul =3D pci_msi_domain_get_msi_rid(domain, pdev);
=20
 	return msi_info->ops->msi_prepare(domain->parent,
-					  dev, dev_alias.count, info);
+					  dev, max(nvec, alias_count), info);
 }
=20
 static struct msi_domain_ops its_pci_msi_ops =3D {
--=20
2.15.1