Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
From:   Sasha Levin <Alexander.Levin@microsoft.com>
To:     "stable@vger.kernel.org" <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
CC:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Vince Weaver <vince@deater.net>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
        Sasha Levin <Alexander.Levin@microsoft.com>
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL for 4.9 006/293] perf/core: Correct event creation
 with PERF_FORMAT_GROUP
Thread-Topic: [PATCH AUTOSEL for 4.9 006/293] perf/core: Correct event
 creation with PERF_FORMAT_GROUP
Thread-Index: AQHTz5jlREnPcUaLyECsKahc5X+CJg==
Date:   Mon, 9 Apr 2018 00:22:51 +0000
Message-ID: <20180409002239.163177-6-alexander.levin@microsoft.com>
References: <20180409002239.163177-1-alexander.levin@microsoft.com>
In-Reply-To: <20180409002239.163177-1-alexander.levin@microsoft.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: microsoft.com does not designate
 permitted sender hosts)
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: fcb9a3b4-dffe-4b27-b990-08d59db08c26
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 09 Apr 2018 00:22:51.1904
 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 72f988bf-86f1-41af-91ab-2d7cd011db47
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DM5PR2101MB1015
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>

[ Upstream commit ba5213ae6b88fb170c4771fef6553f759c7d8cdd ]

Andi was asking about PERF_FORMAT_GROUP vs inherited events, which led
to the discovery of a bug from commit:

  3dab77fb1bf8 ("perf: Rework/fix the whole read vs group stuff")

 -       PERF_SAMPLE_GROUP                       =3D 1U << 4,
 +       PERF_SAMPLE_READ                        =3D 1U << 4,

 -       if (attr->inherit && (attr->sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_GROUP))
 +       if (attr->inherit && (attr->read_format & PERF_FORMAT_GROUP))

is a clear fail :/

While this changes user visible behaviour; it was previously possible
to create an inherited event with PERF_SAMPLE_READ; this is deemed
acceptible because its results were always incorrect.

Reported-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Vince Weaver <vince@deater.net>
Fixes:  3dab77fb1bf8 ("perf: Rework/fix the whole read vs group stuff")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170530094512.dy2nljns2uq7qa3j@hirez.progra=
mming.kicks-ass.net
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@microsoft.com>
---
 kernel/events/core.c | 15 ++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
index 13b9784427b0..4d6f2cd59696 100644
--- a/kernel/events/core.c
+++ b/kernel/events/core.c
@@ -5669,9 +5669,6 @@ static void perf_output_read_one(struct perf_output_h=
andle *handle,
 	__output_copy(handle, values, n * sizeof(u64));
 }
=20
-/*
- * XXX PERF_FORMAT_GROUP vs inherited events seems difficult.
- */
 static void perf_output_read_group(struct perf_output_handle *handle,
 			    struct perf_event *event,
 			    u64 enabled, u64 running)
@@ -5716,6 +5713,13 @@ static void perf_output_read_group(struct perf_outpu=
t_handle *handle,
 #define PERF_FORMAT_TOTAL_TIMES (PERF_FORMAT_TOTAL_TIME_ENABLED|\
 				 PERF_FORMAT_TOTAL_TIME_RUNNING)
=20
+/*
+ * XXX PERF_SAMPLE_READ vs inherited events seems difficult.
+ *
+ * The problem is that its both hard and excessively expensive to iterate =
the
+ * child list, not to mention that its impossible to IPI the children runn=
ing
+ * on another CPU, from interrupt/NMI context.
+ */
 static void perf_output_read(struct perf_output_handle *handle,
 			     struct perf_event *event)
 {
@@ -9259,9 +9263,10 @@ perf_event_alloc(struct perf_event_attr *attr, int c=
pu,
 	local64_set(&hwc->period_left, hwc->sample_period);
=20
 	/*
-	 * we currently do not support PERF_FORMAT_GROUP on inherited events
+	 * We currently do not support PERF_SAMPLE_READ on inherited events.
+	 * See perf_output_read().
 	 */
-	if (attr->inherit && (attr->read_format & PERF_FORMAT_GROUP))
+	if (attr->inherit && (attr->sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_READ))
 		goto err_ns;
=20
 	if (!has_branch_stack(event))
--=20
2.15.1