Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
From:   Sasha Levin <Alexander.Levin@microsoft.com>
To:     "stable@vger.kernel.org" <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
CC:     Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
        Sasha Levin <Alexander.Levin@microsoft.com>
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL for 4.15 015/189] KVM: s390: use created_vcpus in more
 places
Thread-Topic: [PATCH AUTOSEL for 4.15 015/189] KVM: s390: use created_vcpus in
 more places
Thread-Index: AQHTz5gRBEGpHD7TMEKQwteh0chGjQ==
Date:   Mon, 9 Apr 2018 00:16:56 +0000
Message-ID: <20180409001637.162453-15-alexander.levin@microsoft.com>
References: <20180409001637.162453-1-alexander.levin@microsoft.com>
In-Reply-To: <20180409001637.162453-1-alexander.levin@microsoft.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: microsoft.com does not designate
 permitted sender hosts)
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: bef04675-0d32-4da8-f914-08d59daf3424
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 09 Apr 2018 00:16:56.0594
 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 72f988bf-86f1-41af-91ab-2d7cd011db47
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DM5PR2101MB1127
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>

[ Upstream commit 241e3ec0faf5ab1a0d9b1f6c43eefa919fb9c112 ]

commit a03825bbd0c3 ("KVM: s390: use kvm->created_vcpus") introduced
kvm->created_vcpus to avoid races with the existing kvm->online_vcpus
scheme. One place was "forgotten" and one new place was "added".
Let's fix those.

Reported-by: Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Fixes: 4e0b1ab72b8a ("KVM: s390: gs support for kvm guests")
Fixes: a03825bbd0c3 ("KVM: s390: use kvm->created_vcpus")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@microsoft.com>
---
 arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
index 004684eaa827..50193cbc819a 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
@@ -602,7 +602,7 @@ static int kvm_vm_ioctl_enable_cap(struct kvm *kvm, str=
uct kvm_enable_cap *cap)
 	case KVM_CAP_S390_GS:
 		r =3D -EINVAL;
 		mutex_lock(&kvm->lock);
-		if (atomic_read(&kvm->online_vcpus)) {
+		if (kvm->created_vcpus) {
 			r =3D -EBUSY;
 		} else if (test_facility(133)) {
 			set_kvm_facility(kvm->arch.model.fac_mask, 133);
@@ -1122,7 +1122,7 @@ static int kvm_s390_set_processor_feat(struct kvm *kv=
m,
 		return -EINVAL;
=20
 	mutex_lock(&kvm->lock);
-	if (!atomic_read(&kvm->online_vcpus)) {
+	if (!kvm->created_vcpus) {
 		bitmap_copy(kvm->arch.cpu_feat, (unsigned long *) data.feat,
 			    KVM_S390_VM_CPU_FEAT_NR_BITS);
 		ret =3D 0;
--=20
2.15.1