Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
From:   Sasha Levin <Alexander.Levin@microsoft.com>
To:     "stable@vger.kernel.org" <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
CC:     Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>,
        Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@wdc.com>,
        Max Gurtovoy <maxg@mellanox.com>,
        Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>,
        Sasha Levin <Alexander.Levin@microsoft.com>
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL for 4.15 045/189] IB/cq: Don't force IB_POLL_DIRECT
 poll context for ib_process_cq_direct
Thread-Topic: [PATCH AUTOSEL for 4.15 045/189] IB/cq: Don't force
 IB_POLL_DIRECT poll context for ib_process_cq_direct
Thread-Index: AQHTz5ggeRLup7dywkGCbGMSiDnHhw==
Date:   Mon, 9 Apr 2018 00:17:21 +0000
Message-ID: <20180409001637.162453-45-alexander.levin@microsoft.com>
References: <20180409001637.162453-1-alexander.levin@microsoft.com>
In-Reply-To: <20180409001637.162453-1-alexander.levin@microsoft.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: microsoft.com does not designate
 permitted sender hosts)
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 26b48037-43a0-41df-d384-08d59daf5341
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 09 Apr 2018 00:17:21.4478
 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 72f988bf-86f1-41af-91ab-2d7cd011db47
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DM5PR2101MB1048
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

From: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>

[ Upstream commit 246d8b184c100e8eb6b4e8c88f232c2ed2a4e672 ]

polling the completion queue directly does not interfere
with the existing polling logic, hence drop the requirement.
Be aware that running ib_process_cq_direct with non IB_POLL_DIRECT
CQ may trigger concurrent CQ processing.

This can be used for polling mode ULPs.

Cc: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@wdc.com>
Reported-by: Steve Wise <swise@opengridcomputing.com>
Signed-off-by: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>
[maxg: added wcs array argument to __ib_process_cq]
Signed-off-by: Max Gurtovoy <maxg@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@microsoft.com>
---
 drivers/infiniband/core/cq.c | 23 +++++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/core/cq.c b/drivers/infiniband/core/cq.c
index f2ae75fa3128..c8c5a5a7f433 100644
--- a/drivers/infiniband/core/cq.c
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/core/cq.c
@@ -25,9 +25,10 @@
 #define IB_POLL_FLAGS \
 	(IB_CQ_NEXT_COMP | IB_CQ_REPORT_MISSED_EVENTS)
=20
-static int __ib_process_cq(struct ib_cq *cq, int budget)
+static int __ib_process_cq(struct ib_cq *cq, int budget, struct ib_wc *pol=
l_wc)
 {
 	int i, n, completed =3D 0;
+	struct ib_wc *wcs =3D poll_wc ? : cq->wc;
=20
 	/*
 	 * budget might be (-1) if the caller does not
@@ -35,9 +36,9 @@ static int __ib_process_cq(struct ib_cq *cq, int budget)
 	 * minimum here.
 	 */
 	while ((n =3D ib_poll_cq(cq, min_t(u32, IB_POLL_BATCH,
-			budget - completed), cq->wc)) > 0) {
+			budget - completed), wcs)) > 0) {
 		for (i =3D 0; i < n; i++) {
-			struct ib_wc *wc =3D &cq->wc[i];
+			struct ib_wc *wc =3D &wcs[i];
=20
 			if (wc->wr_cqe)
 				wc->wr_cqe->done(cq, wc);
@@ -60,18 +61,20 @@ static int __ib_process_cq(struct ib_cq *cq, int budget=
)
  * @cq:		CQ to process
  * @budget:	number of CQEs to poll for
  *
- * This function is used to process all outstanding CQ entries on a
- * %IB_POLL_DIRECT CQ.  It does not offload CQ processing to a different
- * context and does not ask for completion interrupts from the HCA.
+ * This function is used to process all outstanding CQ entries.
+ * It does not offload CQ processing to a different context and does
+ * not ask for completion interrupts from the HCA.
+ * Using direct processing on CQ with non IB_POLL_DIRECT type may trigger
+ * concurrent processing.
  *
  * Note: do not pass -1 as %budget unless it is guaranteed that the number
  * of completions that will be processed is small.
  */
 int ib_process_cq_direct(struct ib_cq *cq, int budget)
 {
-	WARN_ON_ONCE(cq->poll_ctx !=3D IB_POLL_DIRECT);
+	struct ib_wc wcs[IB_POLL_BATCH];
=20
-	return __ib_process_cq(cq, budget);
+	return __ib_process_cq(cq, budget, wcs);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(ib_process_cq_direct);
=20
@@ -85,7 +88,7 @@ static int ib_poll_handler(struct irq_poll *iop, int budg=
et)
 	struct ib_cq *cq =3D container_of(iop, struct ib_cq, iop);
 	int completed;
=20
-	completed =3D __ib_process_cq(cq, budget);
+	completed =3D __ib_process_cq(cq, budget, NULL);
 	if (completed < budget) {
 		irq_poll_complete(&cq->iop);
 		if (ib_req_notify_cq(cq, IB_POLL_FLAGS) > 0)
@@ -105,7 +108,7 @@ static void ib_cq_poll_work(struct work_struct *work)
 	struct ib_cq *cq =3D container_of(work, struct ib_cq, work);
 	int completed;
=20
-	completed =3D __ib_process_cq(cq, IB_POLL_BUDGET_WORKQUEUE);
+	completed =3D __ib_process_cq(cq, IB_POLL_BUDGET_WORKQUEUE, NULL);
 	if (completed >=3D IB_POLL_BUDGET_WORKQUEUE ||
 	    ib_req_notify_cq(cq, IB_POLL_FLAGS) > 0)
 		queue_work(ib_comp_wq, &cq->work);
--=20
2.15.1