Received: by 10.213.65.68 with SMTP id h4csp2502227imn; Mon, 9 Apr 2018 04:41:13 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx4/RCoHptlPpbNkFVU+KGrRx9vOhSg34Iq0T/uDqypci7AWvSClyUzD+gfg7tG0mrA0kIkV7 X-Received: by 10.99.116.81 with SMTP id e17mr15248578pgn.437.1523274073752; Mon, 09 Apr 2018 04:41:13 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1523274073; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Msu6rhxpolKvHxh7o8NVUJzMkWCIfGpFEBgTaU2lUaksdnvpf22JAA2INYXcPXAJkR C86xjvDYH8lMSBkfAeezB6aj1EeX7CZi8SotYIKqDgDGW56YynBm0ORuvdkNyHzJbnaj oSZMC0K5qnqaV8t1yBSJb4otrR3CeEul9MC+1h07vLZwVkBjbLz3wzqtmwj8n7qZpGfI Jx/igfIsMLfFlZLsJIZSyYrv3QZm1pbcHI2SrQAfVsWDQ4GmeXrMm5ZhrSm+KgsxA6Qs Y4mBJnO7+zFmx0jZzH//ZEcqQZSOG5wY7okrca7opf2PSuNtRe3P5o76TXG92Tt1ugev Zx3g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date:arc-authentication-results; bh=5tcSsGbZrhqirt1z96yKWo5lsCdrrpueENCq92ns2cc=; b=qOy00E8yCrp3dEqTiBG2GZYOGmbz1+S/5OmdhwK/hnozK92iqHel+QtnbzG75+PRSH QeI+8KQ6UF1QfzEz4zCUK86yPjmKsUqyGa7zqPEOx+1BMHOkMWobd3d/l5Q+9DUkE8BH wMSXDoEDSA0QpjdNqjttr9DxZUcZ5igY8s3aX1S/q4rat840y4QpWQWEoonHiv5rgwJA F6TK4yceOja3Fwi/eXZonaz70MQLyFeC/qHlDVLCxmTt+Bghl3KL6VJqJ2wysGb6LFUS Z4eC8l28BufBW+eOrSlsfXAtryuyIH2CEM2WOW1jVP9H9pIjPnmL1qhBr832u4HNi80J i+Jw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id r68si96291pfi.413.2018.04.09.04.40.36; Mon, 09 Apr 2018 04:41:13 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751978AbeDILgQ (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 9 Apr 2018 07:36:16 -0400 Received: from mail.bootlin.com ([62.4.15.54]:45740 "EHLO mail.bootlin.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750759AbeDILgO (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Apr 2018 07:36:14 -0400 Received: by mail.bootlin.com (Postfix, from userid 110) id 4A127206A0; Mon, 9 Apr 2018 13:36:13 +0200 (CEST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on mail.bootlin.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,SHORTCIRCUIT shortcircuit=ham autolearn=disabled version=3.4.0 Received: from localhost (LStLambert-657-1-97-87.w90-63.abo.wanadoo.fr [90.63.216.87]) by mail.bootlin.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 22B3B2038E; Mon, 9 Apr 2018 13:36:03 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2018 13:36:03 +0200 From: Maxime Ripard To: Sergey Suloev Cc: Mark Brown , Chen-Yu Tsai , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-spi@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/6] spi: sun6i: restrict transfer length in PIO-mode Message-ID: <20180409113603.2iexkqvyeqmysp5e@flea> References: <20180405091913.ky4dnmszoobn2xry@flea> <20180405131735.GB12349@sirena.org.uk> <8159c3a5-af74-9f13-aedb-7ecc708bdff6@orpaltech.com> <20180406073441.xesojvzc3deljhoy@flea> <204e97cb-2f39-00f0-fd4e-3aa9a51f7cac@orpaltech.com> <20180409092730.2moyhl5aaktjwbyn@flea> <94a394bd-89bf-9334-c500-4cbadf4c1044@orpaltech.com> <20180409105001.GC11532@sirena.org.uk> <67c2006b-17f2-2459-e3c9-e91e3c694d8c@orpaltech.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="c7ddtt4fgfml6w7z" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <67c2006b-17f2-2459-e3c9-e91e3c694d8c@orpaltech.com> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180323 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --c7ddtt4fgfml6w7z Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Apr 09, 2018 at 02:10:40PM +0300, Sergey Suloev wrote: > On 04/09/2018 01:50 PM, Mark Brown wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 09, 2018 at 01:26:23PM +0300, Sergey Suloev wrote: > > > On 04/09/2018 12:27 PM, Maxime Ripard wrote: > > > > On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 06:48:23PM +0300, Sergey Suloev wrote: > > > > > On 04/06/2018 10:34 AM, Maxime Ripard wrote: > > > > > According to what you said the driver must implement > > > > > "transfer_one_message" instead of "transfer_one" > > > > I'm not sure what makes you think that I said that. > > > Because current implementation tries to send more than FIFO-depth of = data in > > > a single call to "transfer_one" which is wrong. > > No, that's absolutely not the case. All any of these functions has to > > do is transfer whatever they were asked to, how they do it is not at all > > important to the framework. >=20 > I think you don't fully understand the issue. Let's talk about sun4i and= =A0 > sun6i SPI=A0 drivers separately. >=20 > sun4i >=20 > 1)it is correctly declaring max_transfer_size=3DFIFO depth for PIO mode= =A0 but > transfer_one() function doesn't follow the declaration allowing PIO > transfers longer than FIFO depth=A0 by just refilling FIFO using 3/4 FIFO > empty interrupt. I can definitely state here that long transfers WON'T WO= RK > on real hardware. Surely the original author of the patch allowing to do just that disagrees with you. And it's not about the hardware itself, it's about how the driver operates as well. > I tested it and that's why I can say that. Then it must be fixed, and not silently reverted. > But as soon as sun4i SPI driver=A0 is correctly declaring > max_transfer_size then "smart" clients will work well by limiting a > single transfer size to FIFO depth. I tested it with real hardware, > again. This is really not my point. What would prevent you from doing multiple transfers in that case, and filling the FIFO entirely, waiting for it to be done, then resuming until you have sent the right number of bytes? Maxime --=20 Maxime Ripard, Bootlin (formerly Free Electrons) Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com --c7ddtt4fgfml6w7z Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEE0VqZU19dR2zEVaqr0rTAlCFNr3QFAlrLUCIACgkQ0rTAlCFN r3QlohAAmO131yUSwi9hkobfB8OoLlbWtoOp7Lb6szGcm+EKP9CnxnAlRAQuwyC3 9Elfpd9SxVyHw484Das9er0viPndDdz2LJANLiq4q2d7G/Ii2xqtroS6BpmtG480 Jcz8Wpy7fPeaLFMGxyJTzOVKrz8Xmz3fHcVpyDWhU0jtPiHU1uCAn1meUMLWyxse djJ16DRqeXgGiypfjlTwDba/ml8Y45gM4lV1UT/bdLQJvEGKL4V9NaDeYdeMRnyt xyeQbKrHc5kLVNPrsOoCteRRS9xQnmWI/gCy/Hi1nWnCkt0Uidv/JgYU1tGChpOV iLF90KMc9RvzpCwC0lNxUOsdEO4mAPzMJEMjP9ciX7dYuXPfwo5S3QZN0GpQHDVN pgjGLE8IHth/kI4k8FNCQLnhwqRYGoUlOGC3YJfZXddyJpRAFl6L4fHx676EjEh7 VyyraolTNq6+c9pQhZZQJA7nHqVl12VhhuuOUdD5sMEqWmXuBaweAWHNyUEQFRgs xOnKITVTVgyXyM0y79qtb3idvRBi2xpKFyiprJes7C+vpisYidgRxJ6Oh1GWJu52 RZaAwnymTFewXTY8/DDRdGiiRblaRK6mYO2mFIt2LZrHhbIUJCxV2V60fLrqR3Po wJjC7pDoitgT2cKbF0T5ttgYk+E6UL5vdMADfabKBH75ldKQwts= =hFQP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --c7ddtt4fgfml6w7z--