Received: by 10.213.65.68 with SMTP id h4csp2998380imn; Mon, 9 Apr 2018 12:27:54 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx49Evt0xAl/B2c/Fi/Z6swYyY6/4zCFQHm+1mqQ9UMffOTanT3QP9XN6AJw96QDvZ8YMG67O X-Received: by 10.99.148.17 with SMTP id m17mr26104533pge.140.1523302074602; Mon, 09 Apr 2018 12:27:54 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1523302074; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=o8P+r7KIaQcgCr7QcdxQecdQ4/N7j9VkVHlLWUbIsRmzcMcD9SfrD8wrtLBW6fUMf2 l/0SyPDU4N1NABN58cd2avI+iWpQgevVQW09x+exaN1k3imcTlA/fU1YrPWGmanLm8IQ FThTLEzXgkJdkZ5D5gsc+lisPKnW4nUl3RwVUTDyXau8+aVBcORsKNxmlufIQgOAWfPS AUMthwhPhNelJ2a3kzU7YIT2qEidHDRViEjTkFFq7FiLAW8FPNBPsJ5RzDxLp4PA/BuT NFPMa6235Lg3CLlwnFcGXhpKA+zQxT5B8ksmB18fYvGEfZTubOuGDikHasVdJ2ArkJeX wVFQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :references:in-reply-to:mime-version:dkim-signature :arc-authentication-results; bh=g7kkE0CwmDeBA8BOg4KSMp1QX8f6Sr98yhM+eT3JbOM=; b=vWnX1wcIH+H0I/8gU5qDc8/Jb9k/RE9qxu9ubFjqy6JJyvXTe24/OsXPuACguSosal aDs+Wsi/+fMN0cOTwBrViIE4MehW8J4jQyhI5D7mLx+A4tHsASJrYLoY0Ckjc5wAFCdD LlAbwmoF/GE1270T6Yq/NPguxSwq8VDVQOGcqAWMauDnzYdcsX2WQccs08V3Lh5rQZHs NOpOomJVBbq+0pEF3+bIxdFDxkU9r8mMij6mh/CIpnUtL1r5+Wz7dpKD4t9DuSLZBVrt S4PE4Uxy0ordcP2yucZR/MqoEmJq1a5uCQ1+rU655amJOiMD9UrBvBvBuenRXD0/FI5w qSyA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20161025 header.b=BMh5K6v1; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id p125si625935pga.396.2018.04.09.12.27.17; Mon, 09 Apr 2018 12:27:54 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20161025 header.b=BMh5K6v1; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752432AbeDITYh (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 9 Apr 2018 15:24:37 -0400 Received: from mail-ot0-f175.google.com ([74.125.82.175]:33960 "EHLO mail-ot0-f175.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751633AbeDITYf (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Apr 2018 15:24:35 -0400 Received: by mail-ot0-f175.google.com with SMTP id m7-v6so9963227otd.1 for ; Mon, 09 Apr 2018 12:24:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=g7kkE0CwmDeBA8BOg4KSMp1QX8f6Sr98yhM+eT3JbOM=; b=BMh5K6v1wccV5QN/oI8fmHLWtgLdY9T64bxJQJbjUEkvRx0rhLsmKfr2UInrFTILI4 05xruS1DmQm0hGUalK2W7v5CO97r6AcfUpCXF4OKC8Jy4j/aFu8pnzsRALuNEo8nNSXJ qtdpvd9P52ANKNwaFqSI0y23htWmTc75v0cdNG5jmaj4zINJx8+6dqPV3HD+ObbRpiqf Ec+DVoKuUCaqGyzkVyVnNrpfGOdGH+gG58llRTBMEwnbzfmHKmV7vHgI/5RzmoXsuIXi 1EV7Z00uX0a+GVOrechMziSpdf9AYMvhdjPfiK3NEoX5U2mFaGuKf/zjmiNwyblQTfK5 8mvQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=g7kkE0CwmDeBA8BOg4KSMp1QX8f6Sr98yhM+eT3JbOM=; b=fEedLE9c+XiZgfNpcCVuGIe7eqkpu3bSiz2Uu3lCwz+BpipGAabgSdGo15f3yFLy8O vXv3fGwBzoFwH5kCmXxlN3B1vWaW5bd95uhlK97rvfxDMSHgaIEgAVO488NNznYzz1LL TRLIt9aglUWJJenv5G5zV+kqqFm4VCdDPeZ69VpYkxblBG+nCDXtyhQYuS8TyyiBn/Yp 1+/jZYlaovtUhiHyL2M2KeuVMbyFP0DPqe7erVqRA24Y6xZEjVGeg1wgLyzFy8MZ84EP eA/LKGYtrnlip8v1UkFtarA+Uu94fvoYS4yW6JBOEzW95Q1Cd+EzP1rhlJm6GGDjmot7 KvcA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALQs6tAfATbtoaRN2tOlwmpzOQT+ChMwQsoFzUMpXrX7EX1rF0uNTYRs +sJdtjmXCWoptyNzQjpUYPt8dcoBOg0JYJYuxVNkbA== X-Received: by 2002:a9d:4787:: with SMTP id b7-v6mr2279202otf.279.1523301874835; Mon, 09 Apr 2018 12:24:34 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.138.7.200 with HTTP; Mon, 9 Apr 2018 12:24:34 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1523263049-31993-1-git-send-email-karahmed@amazon.de> References: <1523263049-31993-1-git-send-email-karahmed@amazon.de> From: Jim Mattson Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2018 12:24:34 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] kvm: nVMX: Introduce KVM_CAP_STATE To: KarimAllah Ahmed Cc: kvm list , LKML , Paolo Bonzini , =?UTF-8?B?UmFkaW0gS3LEjW3DocWZ?= , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H . Peter Anvin" , "the arch/x86 maintainers" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 1:37 AM, KarimAllah Ahmed wrote: > + /* > + * Force a nested exit that guarantees that any state capture > + * afterwards by any IOCTLs (MSRs, etc) will not capture a mix of L1 > + * and L2 state. > + * > + * One example where that would lead to an issue is the TSC DEADLINE > + * MSR vs the guest TSC. If the L2 guest is running, the guest TSC will > + * be the L2 TSC while the TSC deadline MSR will contain the L1 TSC > + * deadline MSR. That would lead to a very large (and wrong) "expire" > + * diff when LAPIC is initialized during instance restore (i.e. the > + * instance will appear to have hanged!). > + */ This sounds like a bug in the virtualization of IA32_TSC_DEADLINE. Without involving save/restore, what happens if L2 sets IA32_TSC_DEADLINE (and L1 permits it via the MSR permission bitmap)? The IA32_TSC_DEADLINE MSR is always specified with respect to L1's time domain.