Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S271353AbTHRJv4 (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Aug 2003 05:51:56 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S271363AbTHRJv4 (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Aug 2003 05:51:56 -0400 Received: from gw-nl5.philips.com ([212.153.235.109]:61176 "EHLO gw-nl5.philips.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S271353AbTHRJvz (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Aug 2003 05:51:55 -0400 Message-ID: <3F40A202.60701@basmevissen.nl> Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2003 11:53:06 +0200 From: Bas Mevissen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alan Cox Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Linux 2.4.22-rc2-ac3 References: <200308162139.h7GLdW415121@devserv.devel.redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <200308162139.h7GLdW415121@devserv.devel.redhat.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.76.5.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 895 Lines: 28 Alan Cox wrote: > Linux 2.4.22-rc2-ac3 Cool. But a few questions: 1) Can you supply (automatically created) incremental patches? It saves a lot of time to just be able to apply the increments in a (manually) patched up tree. Furthermore, it saves download time as it is a huge patch (POTS modem...). 2) What about the new scheduler? Is that a candidate for 2.4.23 (or even 2.4.22)? I'm asking this because I'm playing around with swsusp patches (created for 2.4.21) and the new scheduler in -ac breaks a few things there. If is is a candidate for 2.4.xx real soon, then we need to fix it. Otherwise, it can be postponed. Regards, Bas. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/