Received: by 10.213.65.68 with SMTP id h4csp3231001imn; Mon, 9 Apr 2018 17:03:37 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx488WPtl4DYqhAOuW9GuK7vyUsRtzstkxsVrikMG/HWf7A4dm67GsF3YBbZL5DJC0UODFm6w X-Received: by 10.99.106.67 with SMTP id f64mr21783197pgc.218.1523318617384; Mon, 09 Apr 2018 17:03:37 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1523318617; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=OqG3BP1q6LIdzw0sPIpIot1Xbgu/KxBTg+eUcCiGuQPhx9YybRVvps8Wr3qxcI5m8n TmOjfgloXqjZsHiiFGqS4AVeaVD1Ghwh2rRHY7OIFjjKDf+N5e3x/04OOc6GN7PLxUUh FGps2klIFOivEhtrHgyBxT+tBMVpQPrUCShsKret2gDLkyN4r3V3DT4WIK724iIo0DwT eHQSCg9FEvqIIkdMGz9Rz2MnIvrCEV19/WqT1x4/EidOhzIqtwn/scSJ8/3/hEDPEfNy z5A06nesxC0ZidDbCZKfkzHy/KX2Dt5aShl236cGkjLxzjfOXcs/Ixej94DvqQDFgbzE DPyw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date:arc-authentication-results; bh=hur4UmyYo+zFJSX68+5bSxv6OL3M6K6CmFGcsLvToCw=; b=FpiXDLTAF/TXB/GKXB8i2F0Vc3E53kwkqWZgD1NvvgSoYF0ODhEnb9a08f1Vyx8B8j 8ALPIazgcBTalvpuD70KRbCCW2YuAGcp1jWeOcH8fL6tLuIwrMMziki1VDuVjjcud2Ry HcDjDqqRZXLv4y1kFAguXTQ7l74xBmhts6GPBiIjStzgtMOCwe1zqxFAGXZtuL4cWhcT beS05MHIhEyL8v+B/9bPmiTjJKbe+zPgcrkVYaPeY+YkTOIWD3xbbGYOd1j1siwrrhAn 5f/HVAzzv+LKicG0Q7ieCKaFWP24B4Gn1TKqI9vNuVPBJ34hTSEzLvLQTnXVObYMHlMZ URJQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id h12-v6si915778pll.431.2018.04.09.17.02.59; Mon, 09 Apr 2018 17:03:37 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752298AbeDIX1l (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 9 Apr 2018 19:27:41 -0400 Received: from mga11.intel.com ([192.55.52.93]:45936 "EHLO mga11.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751624AbeDIX1k (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Apr 2018 19:27:40 -0400 X-Amp-Result: UNKNOWN X-Amp-Original-Verdict: FILE UNKNOWN X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga001.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.23]) by fmsmga102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 09 Apr 2018 16:27:06 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.48,429,1517904000"; d="scan'208";a="45549195" Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.localdomain) ([10.232.112.44]) by fmsmga001.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 09 Apr 2018 16:27:05 -0700 Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2018 17:29:57 -0600 From: Keith Busch To: Oza Pawandeep Cc: Bjorn Helgaas , Philippe Ombredanne , Thomas Gleixner , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Kate Stewart , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Dongdong Liu , Wei Zhang , Sinan Kaya , Timur Tabi Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 4/6] PCI/DPC: Unify and plumb error handling into DPC Message-ID: <20180409232957.GF6283@localhost.localdomain> References: <1523284914-2037-1-git-send-email-poza@codeaurora.org> <1523284914-2037-5-git-send-email-poza@codeaurora.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1523284914-2037-5-git-send-email-poza@codeaurora.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.1 (2017-09-22) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Apr 09, 2018 at 10:41:52AM -0400, Oza Pawandeep wrote: > +static int find_dpc_dev_iter(struct device *device, void *data) > +{ > + struct pcie_port_service_driver *service_driver; > + struct device **dev; > + > + dev = (struct device **) data; > + > + if (device->bus == &pcie_port_bus_type && device->driver) { > + service_driver = to_service_driver(device->driver); > + if (service_driver->service == PCIE_PORT_SERVICE_DPC) { > + *dev = device; > + return 1; > + } > + } > + > + return 0; > +} > + > +static struct device *pci_find_dpc_dev(struct pci_dev *pdev) > +{ > + struct device *dev = NULL; > + > + device_for_each_child(&pdev->dev, &dev, find_dpc_dev_iter); > + > + return dev; > +} The only caller of this doesn't seem to care to use struct device. This should probably just extract struct dpc_dev directly from in here.