Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
From:   Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@gmail.com>
To:     gerrit@erg.abdn.ac.uk, davem@davemloft.net
Cc:     dccp@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] net: decnet: Replace GFP_ATOMIC with GFP_KERNEL in dn_route_init
Date:   Tue, 10 Apr 2018 09:15:40 +0800
Message-Id: <1523322940-27892-1-git-send-email-baijiaju1990@gmail.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

dn_route_init() is never called in atomic context.

The call chain ending up at dn_route_init() is:
[1] dn_route_init() <- decnet_init()
decnet_init() is only set as a parameter of module_init().

Despite never getting called from atomic context,
dn_route_init() calls __get_free_pages() with GFP_ATOMIC,
which does not sleep for allocation.
GFP_ATOMIC is not necessary and can be replaced with GFP_KERNEL,
which can sleep and improve the possibility of sucessful allocation.

This is found by a static analysis tool named DCNS written by myself.
And I also manually check it.

Signed-off-by: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@gmail.com>
---
v2:
* Modify the description of GFP_ATOMIC in v1.
  Thank Eric for good advice.
---
 net/decnet/dn_route.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/net/decnet/dn_route.c b/net/decnet/dn_route.c
index 0bd3afd..59ed12a 100644
--- a/net/decnet/dn_route.c
+++ b/net/decnet/dn_route.c
@@ -1898,7 +1898,7 @@ void __init dn_route_init(void)
 		while(dn_rt_hash_mask & (dn_rt_hash_mask - 1))
 			dn_rt_hash_mask--;
 		dn_rt_hash_table = (struct dn_rt_hash_bucket *)
-			__get_free_pages(GFP_ATOMIC, order);
+			__get_free_pages(GFP_KERNEL, order);
 	} while (dn_rt_hash_table == NULL && --order > 0);
 
 	if (!dn_rt_hash_table)
-- 
1.9.1