Received: by 10.213.65.68 with SMTP id h4csp3466397imn; Mon, 9 Apr 2018 22:30:52 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx4+DdNa4HZX3fM5DCJdZqyDry37yqhzkln4CvchNaZ1upHz6R/YcfcShKG1eGE3UxY4DKGJc X-Received: by 10.99.114.1 with SMTP id n1mr27076653pgc.107.1523338252477; Mon, 09 Apr 2018 22:30:52 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1523338252; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=CUJszx1JdpLSRwZD41CxjlEyfU9wpf1VDdmpT5w2HkR04LSIjM+KXvBVnQX+DQ8r4C +MQ8anu0LHgpPOMsLW7kFhRC4O2J1ZTKmZXaWlscjhBCbpcYLHOhvO59aRU8JRH42DJK RHpPLIw96Zry6sqxGxEJhym5QslFtt89eXvjWbtYVqX29Z+/QjIliIsjsmo6XEldTOrX UWoc6taDGUdeELiXUJqbcAbAKVqAGd7N6/uTKrdIcrpSWBgf2bCM5CS6QFsdE7yiqkGP 71HAVSY3ye/tIH0GXztQt6FzQtHde7DQj+wjltbc3VqbQLFZ95pnKOrTNoC6IA1kOWfc CcPA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:references:in-reply-to:message-id:date :subject:cc:to:from:arc-authentication-results; bh=r/rjxrVyakGzk7Xj2L1iy3fJN4xfCcID/CnBnOc9PvA=; b=C0CRgAtZUpyZcagH/F4wPXixsWV0joJnz1aCzq3LtUB+S/yFmobc533jAkTRLbi3u3 n//pkOmPKlyu/UF0TpjlFaWwcsarEeU8TgDV+1BML+Uc2RScLCE/eSBYRGKckcnm29FQ 0USvZ+vd0viPk52Fnc6CKPSOdQqfRlxmMSRx6K05YmM5oWCluybORpNBD5WaJHFh0Enm C88qlbs8PoFkAc1av9s/+3NTUyqMNYCL7keS3/mBfdE5OfsLiTjC3ns+F6hV53K3Ktvk lTcBZCPeeNuQRfIRurteDQHeL3LEefecbma3KxVY5HasgamuyJcSU1Ht/HTgjTMctlCx Rbgw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id j87si1498349pfk.78.2018.04.09.22.30.15; Mon, 09 Apr 2018 22:30:52 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752242AbeDJF1V (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 10 Apr 2018 01:27:21 -0400 Received: from mx3-rdu2.redhat.com ([66.187.233.73]:33596 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751595AbeDJF1S (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Apr 2018 01:27:18 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D968D8011462; Tue, 10 Apr 2018 05:27:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (ovpn-116-126.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.126]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD2087C5D; Tue, 10 Apr 2018 05:27:11 +0000 (UTC) From: Stefan Hajnoczi To: virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org Cc: syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com, mst@redhat.com, Linus Torvalds , kvm@vger.kernel.org, jasowang@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Stefan Hajnoczi Subject: [PATCH v2 2/2] vhost: return bool from *_access_ok() functions Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2018 13:26:30 +0800 Message-Id: <20180410052630.11270-3-stefanha@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20180410052630.11270-1-stefanha@redhat.com> References: <20180410052630.11270-1-stefanha@redhat.com> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.11.54.5 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.11.55.8]); Tue, 10 Apr 2018 05:27:17 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: inspected by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.11.55.8]); Tue, 10 Apr 2018 05:27:17 +0000 (UTC) for IP:'10.11.54.5' DOMAIN:'int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com' HELO:'smtp.corp.redhat.com' FROM:'stefanha@redhat.com' RCPT:'' Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Currently vhost *_access_ok() functions return int. This is error-prone because there are two popular conventions: 1. 0 means failure, 1 means success 2. -errno means failure, 0 means success Although vhost mostly uses #1, it does not do so consistently. umem_access_ok() uses #2. This patch changes the return type from int to bool so that false means failure and true means success. This eliminates a potential source of errors. Suggested-by: Linus Torvalds Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi --- drivers/vhost/vhost.h | 4 ++-- drivers/vhost/vhost.c | 66 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------- 2 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vhost.h b/drivers/vhost/vhost.h index ac4b6056f19a..6e00fa57af09 100644 --- a/drivers/vhost/vhost.h +++ b/drivers/vhost/vhost.h @@ -178,8 +178,8 @@ void vhost_dev_cleanup(struct vhost_dev *); void vhost_dev_stop(struct vhost_dev *); long vhost_dev_ioctl(struct vhost_dev *, unsigned int ioctl, void __user *argp); long vhost_vring_ioctl(struct vhost_dev *d, int ioctl, void __user *argp); -int vhost_vq_access_ok(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq); -int vhost_log_access_ok(struct vhost_dev *); +bool vhost_vq_access_ok(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq); +bool vhost_log_access_ok(struct vhost_dev *); int vhost_get_vq_desc(struct vhost_virtqueue *, struct iovec iov[], unsigned int iov_count, diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c index 93fd0c75b0d8..b6a082ef33dd 100644 --- a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c +++ b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c @@ -641,14 +641,14 @@ void vhost_dev_cleanup(struct vhost_dev *dev) } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vhost_dev_cleanup); -static int log_access_ok(void __user *log_base, u64 addr, unsigned long sz) +static bool log_access_ok(void __user *log_base, u64 addr, unsigned long sz) { u64 a = addr / VHOST_PAGE_SIZE / 8; /* Make sure 64 bit math will not overflow. */ if (a > ULONG_MAX - (unsigned long)log_base || a + (unsigned long)log_base > ULONG_MAX) - return 0; + return false; return access_ok(VERIFY_WRITE, log_base + a, (sz + VHOST_PAGE_SIZE * 8 - 1) / VHOST_PAGE_SIZE / 8); @@ -661,30 +661,30 @@ static bool vhost_overflow(u64 uaddr, u64 size) } /* Caller should have vq mutex and device mutex. */ -static int vq_memory_access_ok(void __user *log_base, struct vhost_umem *umem, - int log_all) +static bool vq_memory_access_ok(void __user *log_base, struct vhost_umem *umem, + int log_all) { struct vhost_umem_node *node; if (!umem) - return 0; + return false; list_for_each_entry(node, &umem->umem_list, link) { unsigned long a = node->userspace_addr; if (vhost_overflow(node->userspace_addr, node->size)) - return 0; + return false; if (!access_ok(VERIFY_WRITE, (void __user *)a, node->size)) - return 0; + return false; else if (log_all && !log_access_ok(log_base, node->start, node->size)) - return 0; + return false; } - return 1; + return true; } static inline void __user *vhost_vq_meta_fetch(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq, @@ -701,13 +701,13 @@ static inline void __user *vhost_vq_meta_fetch(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq, /* Can we switch to this memory table? */ /* Caller should have device mutex but not vq mutex */ -static int memory_access_ok(struct vhost_dev *d, struct vhost_umem *umem, - int log_all) +static bool memory_access_ok(struct vhost_dev *d, struct vhost_umem *umem, + int log_all) { int i; for (i = 0; i < d->nvqs; ++i) { - int ok; + bool ok; bool log; mutex_lock(&d->vqs[i]->mutex); @@ -717,12 +717,12 @@ static int memory_access_ok(struct vhost_dev *d, struct vhost_umem *umem, ok = vq_memory_access_ok(d->vqs[i]->log_base, umem, log); else - ok = 1; + ok = true; mutex_unlock(&d->vqs[i]->mutex); if (!ok) - return 0; + return false; } - return 1; + return true; } static int translate_desc(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq, u64 addr, u32 len, @@ -959,21 +959,21 @@ static void vhost_iotlb_notify_vq(struct vhost_dev *d, spin_unlock(&d->iotlb_lock); } -static int umem_access_ok(u64 uaddr, u64 size, int access) +static bool umem_access_ok(u64 uaddr, u64 size, int access) { unsigned long a = uaddr; /* Make sure 64 bit math will not overflow. */ if (vhost_overflow(uaddr, size)) - return -EFAULT; + return false; if ((access & VHOST_ACCESS_RO) && !access_ok(VERIFY_READ, (void __user *)a, size)) - return -EFAULT; + return false; if ((access & VHOST_ACCESS_WO) && !access_ok(VERIFY_WRITE, (void __user *)a, size)) - return -EFAULT; - return 0; + return false; + return true; } static int vhost_process_iotlb_msg(struct vhost_dev *dev, @@ -988,7 +988,7 @@ static int vhost_process_iotlb_msg(struct vhost_dev *dev, ret = -EFAULT; break; } - if (umem_access_ok(msg->uaddr, msg->size, msg->perm)) { + if (!umem_access_ok(msg->uaddr, msg->size, msg->perm)) { ret = -EFAULT; break; } @@ -1135,10 +1135,10 @@ static int vhost_iotlb_miss(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq, u64 iova, int access) return 0; } -static int vq_access_ok(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq, unsigned int num, - struct vring_desc __user *desc, - struct vring_avail __user *avail, - struct vring_used __user *used) +static bool vq_access_ok(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq, unsigned int num, + struct vring_desc __user *desc, + struct vring_avail __user *avail, + struct vring_used __user *used) { size_t s = vhost_has_feature(vq, VIRTIO_RING_F_EVENT_IDX) ? 2 : 0; @@ -1161,8 +1161,8 @@ static void vhost_vq_meta_update(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq, vq->meta_iotlb[type] = node; } -static int iotlb_access_ok(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq, - int access, u64 addr, u64 len, int type) +static bool iotlb_access_ok(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq, + int access, u64 addr, u64 len, int type) { const struct vhost_umem_node *node; struct vhost_umem *umem = vq->iotlb; @@ -1220,7 +1220,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vq_iotlb_prefetch); /* Can we log writes? */ /* Caller should have device mutex but not vq mutex */ -int vhost_log_access_ok(struct vhost_dev *dev) +bool vhost_log_access_ok(struct vhost_dev *dev) { return memory_access_ok(dev, dev->umem, 1); } @@ -1228,8 +1228,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vhost_log_access_ok); /* Verify access for write logging. */ /* Caller should have vq mutex and device mutex */ -static int vq_log_access_ok(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq, - void __user *log_base) +static bool vq_log_access_ok(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq, + void __user *log_base) { size_t s = vhost_has_feature(vq, VIRTIO_RING_F_EVENT_IDX) ? 2 : 0; @@ -1242,14 +1242,14 @@ static int vq_log_access_ok(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq, /* Can we start vq? */ /* Caller should have vq mutex and device mutex */ -int vhost_vq_access_ok(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq) +bool vhost_vq_access_ok(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq) { if (!vq_log_access_ok(vq, vq->log_base)) - return 0; + return false; /* Access validation occurs at prefetch time with IOTLB */ if (vq->iotlb) - return 1; + return true; return vq_access_ok(vq, vq->num, vq->desc, vq->avail, vq->used); } -- 2.14.3