Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S271412AbTHRMgi (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Aug 2003 08:36:38 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S271685AbTHRMgi (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Aug 2003 08:36:38 -0400 Received: from hera.cwi.nl ([192.16.191.8]:12775 "EHLO hera.cwi.nl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S271412AbTHRMgh (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Aug 2003 08:36:37 -0400 From: Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2003 14:36:34 +0200 (MEST) Message-Id: To: Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl, hch@infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Re: [PATCH] scsi.h uses "u8" which isn't defined. Cc: Dominik.Strasser@t-online.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@transmeta.com Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 762 Lines: 20 From hch@infradead.org Mon Aug 18 14:24:53 2003 On Mon, Aug 18, 2003 at 02:19:41PM +0200, Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl wrote: > The right approach is not to break userspace without any kernel > benefit whatsoever, but to eliminate the accumulated cruft from > scsi.h. Userspace is supposed to use the glibc which is there for exactly that reason. Yes, I already know that you know the mantra. But you make it sound as if this sad situation is optimal and never to be changed. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/