Received: by 10.213.65.68 with SMTP id h4csp3867167imn; Tue, 10 Apr 2018 06:00:34 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx49cxENjRvBwEkC5zkBNLUOD7mZDgXBA/bLpSejte6puQhG9NijBamOtVrHye4S88nHZXSIQ X-Received: by 10.101.85.73 with SMTP id t9mr202263pgr.451.1523365234834; Tue, 10 Apr 2018 06:00:34 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1523365234; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=JstSoW81ftGWFgdNm+6JsGwVs15DqpEtgYyZQ5ow/s3+tCSDsfAEiKGugcn6UO9c8u yyOG+nfRlBbVJD9aR3Q3dSudkOfbldtr8CJQnNabhF/0jHOv6VvaMIQXB9+dQNXXiaPz KmmuCU7Vy5aLDexw23IHu8Uj+BQ8PrZF4cFW56b+iCyP4yqF4712SnOFUlSdCtZqQwGm WjsiEOPzG0ZEgYpjoqHUMgiM6jyvRgVeAQ4mJZQ/FhRsl5OHU2ABL/ySsyEJyGF1Hrik MCoFwRSB+iNVM08HKGf008doQ6KZIH4tTJdycmk6EUfjgcYiOJZU6tyDdpRIDVVnsPbh FC4A== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date:arc-authentication-results; bh=ZVM3MtzRhTexdPT0FJJ6GfuR5bWHHxTiszobcEgN3Js=; b=fKOjxFXWjHlrohayBLsCcL6yE5gHgVNhM0U9pmTQnXnTr5STUL4qhmbRdXznvMIaqM P+E2pBY7dCt0hLreJ8xQJjhyetKmmkr+XN/zFFE/Up2eoajridBzRl9RUkPWVNP/q8T2 m3INUg5m1kZxmjvuU/N/TC7scC+khPwh6/VmzIEt7wjSMFsMfefeRuO0Zgt4ENHhbrlQ CqZ1ZRvl8RJ7kEmArBTtri2viboE4rTVe8XVPaUuAijscfR3QnDsG5pDFohlDoIt9UGL nu9A0HHDZVA4HzNIqiyO3krxBpIN8s6K/p/zYCbcZaq91A7jFCJceng1I2dYekH0iE3m IO7Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id m83si2101497pfk.171.2018.04.10.05.59.57; Tue, 10 Apr 2018 06:00:34 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753029AbeDJM4y (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 10 Apr 2018 08:56:54 -0400 Received: from mga04.intel.com ([192.55.52.120]:65190 "EHLO mga04.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752958AbeDJM4x (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Apr 2018 08:56:53 -0400 X-Amp-Result: UNKNOWN X-Amp-Original-Verdict: FILE UNKNOWN X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga001.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.23]) by fmsmga104.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 10 Apr 2018 05:56:47 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.48,432,1517904000"; d="scan'208";a="45711019" Received: from yu-chen.sh.intel.com ([10.239.160.138]) by fmsmga001.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 10 Apr 2018 05:56:46 -0700 Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2018 21:00:02 +0800 From: Yu Chen To: "Bityutskiy, Artem" Cc: "lenb@kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" , "rjw@rjwysocki.net" Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC] tools/power turbostat: if --max_loop, print for specific time of loops Message-ID: <20180410130002.GB29464@yu-chen.sh.intel.com> References: <20180410101831.28530-1-yu.c.chen@intel.com> <1523358141.2753.194.camel@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1523358141.2753.194.camel@intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.1 (2017-09-22) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 07:02:22PM +0800, Bityutskiy, Artem wrote: > On Tue, 2018-04-10 at 18:18 +0800, Yu Chen wrote: > > @@ -5076,6 +5084,15 @@ void cmdline(int argc, char **argv) > > print_version(); > > exit(0); > > break; > > + case 'x': > > + { > > + unsigned int loops = strtod(optarg, NULL); > > It would make sense to error out here if you get a value <= 0. > OK. > > + > > + if (loops % 2) > > + loops++; > > What is this for? > It was intended to make the number of loops even for simplify. But after rethink about this, it might not be necessary. I'll change it. > > + max_loops = loops; > > Is the "loops" variable really needed? Can you strtod directly to > max_loops? If the sanity check for user input is added then I think the local variable is needed. Thanks, Yu > > -- > Best Regards, > Artem Bityutskiy