Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2003 07:28:33 -0700
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
To: Willy Tarreau <willy@w.ods.org>
Cc: netdev@oss.sgi.com, linux-net@vger.kernel.org,
       linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [2.4 PATCH] bugfix: ARP respond on all devices
Message-Id: <20030818072833.1ea7a81b.davem@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <20030818142847.GA19910@alpha.home.local>
References: <200308171759540391.00AA8CAB@192.168.128.16>
	<1061137577.21885.50.camel@dhcp23.swansea.linux.org.uk>
	<200308171827130739.00C3905F@192.168.128.16>
	<1061141045.21885.74.camel@dhcp23.swansea.linux.org.uk>
	<20030817224849.GB734@alpha.home.local>
	<20030817223118.3cbc497c.davem@redhat.com>
	<20030818133957.3d3d51d2.skraw@ithnet.com>
	<20030818044419.0bc24d14.davem@redhat.com>
	<20030818125158.GA18699@alpha.home.local>
	<20030818055329.44db9262.davem@redhat.com>
	<20030818142847.GA19910@alpha.home.local>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 676
Lines: 15

On Mon, 18 Aug 2003 16:28:47 +0200
Willy Tarreau <willy@w.ods.org> wrote:

> Now if you think that the behaviour I'm proposing is broken, please explain me
> why.

If the user overrides the source address (which is the case I believe
you're talking about, there are so many cases it's hard for me
to keep track) then HE KNOWS WHAT HE IS DOING even if using that
source address to talk to a particular remote address makes no sense.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/