Received: by 10.192.165.156 with SMTP id m28csp34031imm; Tue, 10 Apr 2018 15:50:00 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx49wH59VVq9KBxWe/w8SyktbLiKwTHG+epH61tDW8DBx9dWbhdK8x7tARUsSNAb8QCXNzY7u X-Received: by 10.167.130.85 with SMTP id e21mr1889974pfn.86.1523400599951; Tue, 10 Apr 2018 15:49:59 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1523400599; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=ZXkPQFQ7NctPWFPEjRRlNzOwjE+8nJN3l7Zlhyj6tlKw3CZOHX2BG9vb/8kmDteRkm 6bfU6YC+0q3Zo0C9aB3+dtXOLAAeEdyHOcE17qTEmGlPGMAIhQZGSEq/4aa03VQ97hk1 /kyQAQ8tX0Q7s0rciPvw33x8El2aH0zQ+SVFnlfViBp8ts66H6zuqM5Ahb0/SIPlHOV6 nrV23FOG1nSjrgGhkN2PmgNUsRJJLFWv17vJ2kbH0CD/CmOETFTD0N+UAKiyS3CN55FF Igrd8vGv7JNkzctf6v9Y5JGNqlgnllc05NgtjP5JpPIyxZnMJuaQjJnBDY93Rh3foF36 nsOQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:mime-version:user-agent:references :in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from :arc-authentication-results; bh=DtaLSEhJn8UQT+IuEyVWlR5Se7Eku7rThDm+OYF3NwE=; b=YF6BoviUdJefCRG7IyA/UeWmTGaeJtIP5KgGj/K8TQVWN7Kh4NUB1iVUrWUNy/WzTt I1QsQL53Y9m9GBBsD5/fp2p4k1HB8ciudZbR7h8gpomryfMSjSs9LPLx8wj3dyWrkdtR AV5Ys32H85t3ln6fEh3J7j+1QdzdsA4oesCdZQ41uT4qfn2VSb4NgYk5cN8d0J9ZdPvi BIxy2Eu9Y/0qZu72nyhjzy6KIZTsl6Yy0fvO+vXQkZZ26TeZMeIQSCWWuEFWm1y8q3TQ yhcFwuEa3JSCgO9AxmSAUaGAOcDaVAlvW8GvTKssPf9o7HWFbTyZ8r7iCRYHeT/7dplt PhkA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id t21si2855750pfi.221.2018.04.10.15.49.23; Tue, 10 Apr 2018 15:49:59 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932590AbeDJWjW (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 10 Apr 2018 18:39:22 -0400 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:45188 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932556AbeDJWjT (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Apr 2018 18:39:19 -0400 Received: from localhost (LFbn-1-12247-202.w90-92.abo.wanadoo.fr [90.92.61.202]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D5426DAB; Tue, 10 Apr 2018 22:39:18 +0000 (UTC) From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Dirk van der Merwe , Jakub Kicinski , "David S. Miller" Subject: [PATCH 4.14 125/138] nfp: use full 40 bits of the NSP buffer address Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2018 00:25:15 +0200 Message-Id: <20180410212916.718222404@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.0 In-Reply-To: <20180410212902.121524696@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20180410212902.121524696@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.65 X-stable: review MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 4.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Dirk van der Merwe [ Upstream commit 1489bbd10e16079ce30a53d3c22a431fd47af791 ] The NSP default buffer is a piece of NFP memory where additional command data can be placed. Its format has been copied from host buffer, but the PCIe selection bits do not make sense in this case. If those get masked out from a NFP address - writes to random place in the chip memory may be issued and crash the device. Even in the general NSP buffer case, it doesn't make sense to have the PCIe selection bits there anymore. These are unused at the moment, and when it becomes necessary, the PCIe selection bits should rather be moved to another register to utilise more bits for the buffer address. This has never been an issue because the buffer used to be allocated in memory with less-than-38-bit-long address but that is about to change. Fixes: 1a64821c6af7 ("nfp: add support for service processor access") Signed-off-by: Dirk van der Merwe Reviewed-by: Jakub Kicinski Signed-off-by: David S. Miller Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfpcore/nfp_nsp.c | 9 +++++---- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfpcore/nfp_nsp.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfpcore/nfp_nsp.c @@ -68,10 +68,11 @@ /* CPP address to retrieve the data from */ #define NSP_BUFFER 0x10 #define NSP_BUFFER_CPP GENMASK_ULL(63, 40) -#define NSP_BUFFER_PCIE GENMASK_ULL(39, 38) -#define NSP_BUFFER_ADDRESS GENMASK_ULL(37, 0) +#define NSP_BUFFER_ADDRESS GENMASK_ULL(39, 0) #define NSP_DFLT_BUFFER 0x18 +#define NSP_DFLT_BUFFER_CPP GENMASK_ULL(63, 40) +#define NSP_DFLT_BUFFER_ADDRESS GENMASK_ULL(39, 0) #define NSP_DFLT_BUFFER_CONFIG 0x20 #define NSP_DFLT_BUFFER_SIZE_MB GENMASK_ULL(7, 0) @@ -412,8 +413,8 @@ static int nfp_nsp_command_buf(struct nf if (err < 0) return err; - cpp_id = FIELD_GET(NSP_BUFFER_CPP, reg) << 8; - cpp_buf = FIELD_GET(NSP_BUFFER_ADDRESS, reg); + cpp_id = FIELD_GET(NSP_DFLT_BUFFER_CPP, reg) << 8; + cpp_buf = FIELD_GET(NSP_DFLT_BUFFER_ADDRESS, reg); if (in_buf && in_size) { err = nfp_cpp_write(cpp, cpp_id, cpp_buf, in_buf, in_size);