Received: by 10.192.165.156 with SMTP id m28csp38540imm; Tue, 10 Apr 2018 15:56:20 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx4+FXXqi03JUS08PtKxHA6jZfjayxfuytqJeW9HvXMrN6KNxwcM9oE8hiuvrInZDMum0JPQP X-Received: by 10.99.182.73 with SMTP id v9mr1602371pgt.158.1523400980722; Tue, 10 Apr 2018 15:56:20 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1523400980; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=GxHcloCPkLe7/daplidXIw1bS+Meu5H3YCnlLDw36fJSjmL3Ev3c+g/kpr/bkYkTWb oedyWw7farB3qZjJ8Lvngv8rYoj2zGn2r0XpaajVaSePOfliG4SPh2e5bGh6kpG0p6pw QVYNARGMf36rTFkNc2lCMJxnQNuZ2MhVJ+pAQt+6vesrMRCyvXPkX1dzL5Bg9GHH3z1A +hjmrIGZcbmzEitHGjC1kg1BseyuYivE1EfSL8vS6YkzrkLr6Lc9xt78SMSjVkT8Uir3 TLQEg2lIfVpuomvE9B9K5nEH6Jejadaz7t49DlBgCHDLTAfEzwbxel13W3AbVCbPOc2E WnfA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:mime-version:user-agent:references :in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from :arc-authentication-results; bh=KVeUSv6vUCKk8m8GJml0xXyOSzGvrVSgjTlBn94CJHk=; b=B7s+Ib73KiiXVkYVxOZ9WVET3ZqjEMKIl5Ta7e5xlJ8ZT0hgPdFyhcK3WPm/EBJLEJ jRhCCh/UF7DgfDaOy3/SC8o890brui2vCN7zPdVVFGyys3FxDkuqH47j1y6fetMHJBdM PI6yyXQdDKWlwjN6WBGN4lNpmdw/HKs4JZR4mA/ggmio5MQerFPE9Sm3aXKAoO7h2lyo dDmWubWSwCMKCT7c02gkZJ93gJuk8K1wflXK6yq7syY/W4+aK2SEbWt3oSeYMPeF3sy/ qaygfkm2m4qAiFl3NFEzD36HIu3HwOciJHr0Doum64fP/q2cgpuPMgMAMoy2plkxb8UB xp0w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id j25si2836522pfj.193.2018.04.10.15.55.44; Tue, 10 Apr 2018 15:56:20 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755199AbeDJWiP (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 10 Apr 2018 18:38:15 -0400 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:44564 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755900AbeDJWiM (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Apr 2018 18:38:12 -0400 Received: from localhost (LFbn-1-12247-202.w90-92.abo.wanadoo.fr [90.92.61.202]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 77A89D57; Tue, 10 Apr 2018 22:38:11 +0000 (UTC) From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Donald Sharp , David Ahern , "David S. Miller" Subject: [PATCH 4.14 101/138] net/ipv6: Fix route leaking between VRFs Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2018 00:24:51 +0200 Message-Id: <20180410212913.918104821@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.0 In-Reply-To: <20180410212902.121524696@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20180410212902.121524696@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.65 X-stable: review MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 4.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: David Ahern [ Upstream commit b6cdbc85234b072340b8923e69f49ec293f905dc ] Donald reported that IPv6 route leaking between VRFs is not working. The root cause is the strict argument in the call to rt6_lookup when validating the nexthop spec. ip6_route_check_nh validates the gateway and device (if given) of a route spec. It in turn could call rt6_lookup (e.g., lookup in a given table did not succeed so it falls back to a full lookup) and if so sets the strict argument to 1. That means if the egress device is given, the route lookup needs to return a result with the same device. This strict requirement does not work with VRFs (IPv4 or IPv6) because the oif in the flow struct is overridden with the index of the VRF device to trigger a match on the l3mdev rule and force the lookup to its table. The right long term solution is to add an l3mdev index to the flow struct such that the oif is not overridden. That solution will not backport well, so this patch aims for a simpler solution to relax the strict argument if the route spec device is an l3mdev slave. As done in other places, use the FLOWI_FLAG_SKIP_NH_OIF to know that the RT6_LOOKUP_F_IFACE flag needs to be removed. Fixes: ca254490c8df ("net: Add VRF support to IPv6 stack") Reported-by: Donald Sharp Signed-off-by: David Ahern Signed-off-by: David S. Miller Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- net/ipv6/route.c | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) --- a/net/ipv6/route.c +++ b/net/ipv6/route.c @@ -871,6 +871,9 @@ static struct rt6_info *ip6_pol_route_lo struct fib6_node *fn; struct rt6_info *rt; + if (fl6->flowi6_flags & FLOWI_FLAG_SKIP_NH_OIF) + flags &= ~RT6_LOOKUP_F_IFACE; + read_lock_bh(&table->tb6_lock); fn = fib6_lookup(&table->tb6_root, &fl6->daddr, &fl6->saddr); restart: