Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S272226AbTHRSOm (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Aug 2003 14:14:42 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S272229AbTHRSOm (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Aug 2003 14:14:42 -0400 Received: from [63.247.75.124] ([63.247.75.124]:21653 "EHLO havoc.gtf.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S272226AbTHRSOl (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Aug 2003 14:14:41 -0400 Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2003 14:14:40 -0400 From: Jeff Garzik To: Christoph Hellwig , Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl, Dominik.Strasser@t-online.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@transmeta.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] Re: [PATCH] scsi.h uses "u8" which isn't defined. Message-ID: <20030818181440.GK24693@gtf.org> References: <20030818132451.A22393@infradead.org> <20030818180845.GB3889@mars.ravnborg.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030818180845.GB3889@mars.ravnborg.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 737 Lines: 21 On Mon, Aug 18, 2003 at 08:08:46PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > hpa IIRC suggested to create a separate directory: > include/abi > and then all relevant parts of the kernel should publish their public > interface in the abi directory. Would that be usefull? I support include/abi, or some other directory that segregates user<->kernel shared headers away from kernel-private headers. I don't see how that would be auto-generated, though. Only created through lots of hard work :) Jeff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/