Received: by 10.192.165.156 with SMTP id m28csp69757imm; Tue, 10 Apr 2018 16:37:39 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx48tD8CAcw5L71KXGJ2E8uCtk/hs8rV2ROgnauvisY/fsYwiHKi8Nww9jNrpoJaL3Eqf4sPe X-Received: by 10.99.109.139 with SMTP id i133mr1682156pgc.174.1523403459095; Tue, 10 Apr 2018 16:37:39 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1523403459; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=s1MrJggxlmEQRW+7IEVzOcTPSfJ6+z3/KzWUlJJVRb8pLTZscA2zAXQ73nSzPiWDqY CO77YOpvVOgE423b5ztoxHsQ2g4S6+sIlmhaSJNqEaC/0btRfGwKtYJ9IsnIH8fqHoHn om9IIszQ8uteOZPBug87Kf15ZvDtdEz4whyDuL4pm3mdCCGeTWpN0Me90amr2dN84Abc V2M2qPXonGuYvjzL6stN6swctbhl0LtYvSg9bYhmQfiF2UoAIQyX+t4NWFk+Rplqn7Ki EmsDDdGZrH2JDai+1LEz9oiqyXTfRZokBe49/cUYktz0ljV2XoeuYkTC900c3iyFubBX dofA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:mime-version:user-agent:references :in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from :arc-authentication-results; bh=CaTtowvVAZ+XDgPwcWH4QuEeXw57ZPbDGff2pb/e8t8=; b=vHqJhSxbVT8LrzuRSa6Hhknbm6Jwivq/yTF/6Kp1oApoXWL5fXMFuadwKroQxRsq2u G1hSrE1HNZljyu4+c5nWoiWa0NEwNs0zurIksqHqG5uh71lluNfX2pxfsZUCNWTUXf+j FyY8bEB5lQVLdXSca4e7laSVVfOgupsFLxEJ8qNcZolcfIC7+kfF1T49DiVjd2x+YUvg qRa9dy8g1u3y1PwnSvrKido34RoD44ephbUGJF2AsvXnfTmnY2iLqPt1l8beqZM8tGC6 Bq8aTJk14qB79KwLwMgUHInAvRL3alLDI38J17CzvisdqYh60wj7FIegx7KYXCPh/cga kTxA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 3-v6si3686109plt.98.2018.04.10.16.37.02; Tue, 10 Apr 2018 16:37:39 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754211AbeDJW3F (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 10 Apr 2018 18:29:05 -0400 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:39290 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754193AbeDJW3B (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Apr 2018 18:29:01 -0400 Received: from localhost (LFbn-1-12247-202.w90-92.abo.wanadoo.fr [90.92.61.202]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 67741D16; Tue, 10 Apr 2018 22:29:00 +0000 (UTC) From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Andrea Adami , Robert Jarzmik , Daniel Thompson , Lee Jones , Sasha Levin Subject: [PATCH 4.15 054/168] backlight: tdo24m: Fix the SPI CS between transfers Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2018 00:23:16 +0200 Message-Id: <20180410212802.508966761@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.0 In-Reply-To: <20180410212800.144079021@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20180410212800.144079021@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.65 X-stable: review MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 4.15-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Robert Jarzmik [ Upstream commit 2023b0524a6310e9ea80daf085f51c71bff9289f ] Currently the LCD display (TD035S) on the cm-x300 platform is broken and remains blank. The TD0245S specification requires that the chipselect is toggled between commands sent to the panel. This was also the purpose of the former patch of commit f64dcac0b124 ("backlight: tdo24m: ensure chip select changes between transfers"). Unfortunately, the "cs_change" field of a SPI transfer is misleading. Its true meaning is that for a SPI message holding multiple transfers, the chip select is toggled between each transfer, but for the last transfer it remains asserted. In this driver, all the SPI messages contain exactly one transfer, which means that each transfer is the last of its message, and as a consequence the chip select is never toggled. Actually, there was a second bug hidding the first one, hence the problem was not seen until v4.6. This problem was fixed by commit a52db659c79c ("spi: pxa2xx: Fix cs_change management") for PXA based boards. This fix makes the TD035S work again on a cm-x300 board. The same applies to other PXA boards, ie. corgi and tosa. Fixes: a52db659c79c ("spi: pxa2xx: Fix cs_change management") Reported-by: Andrea Adami Signed-off-by: Robert Jarzmik Acked-by: Daniel Thompson Signed-off-by: Lee Jones Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- drivers/video/backlight/corgi_lcd.c | 2 +- drivers/video/backlight/tdo24m.c | 2 +- drivers/video/backlight/tosa_lcd.c | 2 +- 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) --- a/drivers/video/backlight/corgi_lcd.c +++ b/drivers/video/backlight/corgi_lcd.c @@ -177,7 +177,7 @@ static int corgi_ssp_lcdtg_send(struct c struct spi_message msg; struct spi_transfer xfer = { .len = 1, - .cs_change = 1, + .cs_change = 0, .tx_buf = lcd->buf, }; --- a/drivers/video/backlight/tdo24m.c +++ b/drivers/video/backlight/tdo24m.c @@ -369,7 +369,7 @@ static int tdo24m_probe(struct spi_devic spi_message_init(m); - x->cs_change = 1; + x->cs_change = 0; x->tx_buf = &lcd->buf[0]; spi_message_add_tail(x, m); --- a/drivers/video/backlight/tosa_lcd.c +++ b/drivers/video/backlight/tosa_lcd.c @@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ static int tosa_tg_send(struct spi_devic struct spi_message msg; struct spi_transfer xfer = { .len = 1, - .cs_change = 1, + .cs_change = 0, .tx_buf = buf, };