Received: by 10.192.165.156 with SMTP id m28csp844214imm; Wed, 11 Apr 2018 08:07:09 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx48YvElYRNGR9GgRZmi3oCC1ycReH59JH+mDUqvSJII8CrGzgda/f80n/0ojHNo7Cl9JQ6h0 X-Received: by 10.98.223.16 with SMTP id u16mr4397888pfg.146.1523459229575; Wed, 11 Apr 2018 08:07:09 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1523459229; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=xDGtON/MF6gT9tqP8OejzAM1MIHin9crK2zWib0cNzGTQ3XEHzcl/vjs3bc7+Y/96o dyImwjgFB9VlejWAKBadlp5kqftPcTwNUCKTXyoHHn8yEY1NcuwgI+wULfZD7gwyo0eM 3MI78I949bT3GQQvSs9sFky7zJ0ysMvuqc8YlWq0kGzPd79o4KOyM4Dr15gcqIKLUsUV y9jCg0KKbbgpgX7H95zyWLC+rWfddst9zal8nQk6ZIYsziVy/hobY7nFMgXnSXupHOQ6 0qqjhXS7ufFASoYoJclXrkMdEXUV3mnR8loPM8qAau41Mvkwup0WaJOWxlUoP9h6Luda WB1w== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date :arc-authentication-results; bh=h/YwmpN+zpPKZg6FYd3FdJX9SBsJOGkDwAfxqHxZ31I=; b=VVBZdLDwgqxzu3b6KxP6qtW0pptJLbeGOyDfZrvp9Qgf4HDmL05aTxSHMaXHzUAVTU X8+uMHajxu/ePuNBV12fOGGu98Hvj5XywNmBZS/KXXgLZhR6TVKw4oDgaBZamiwadcyF DpImn6MiL96Ni3htEygN2AKseGwiuaKj7nTYUVBhweIwATZ0WNKlq6oH2jC25WSK+3BM 9FojFVG3gnxjxJ0f10yIbBcoseXIIzRwqRQE8Do3hyde13bsSmmuMUP+kGuWmVzeXSaC ZQWiwbuRbLiNUJvaXRk2aBaB7LeXkWqj1s0IyUeYhxUR7MPjE9i8tBMGsB8OwASYrPKK v3uw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id a23si945820pfa.95.2018.04.11.08.06.32; Wed, 11 Apr 2018 08:07:09 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753751AbeDKO72 (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 11 Apr 2018 10:59:28 -0400 Received: from mail.bootlin.com ([62.4.15.54]:54498 "EHLO mail.bootlin.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752947AbeDKO71 (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Apr 2018 10:59:27 -0400 Received: by mail.bootlin.com (Postfix, from userid 110) id 0F4A52072F; Wed, 11 Apr 2018 16:59:26 +0200 (CEST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on mail.bootlin.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,SHORTCIRCUIT shortcircuit=ham autolearn=disabled version=3.4.0 Received: from bbrezillon (LStLambert-657-1-97-87.w90-63.abo.wanadoo.fr [90.63.216.87]) by mail.bootlin.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BB34920723; Wed, 11 Apr 2018 16:59:25 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2018 16:59:25 +0200 From: Boris Brezillon To: Peter Rosin Cc: Nicolas Ferre , Alexandre Belloni , Richard Weinberger , Josh Wu , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Marek Vasut , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, Cyrille Pitchen , Brian Norris , David Woodhouse , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd: nand: raw: atmel: add module param to avoid using dma Message-ID: <20180411165925.2be0d45b@bbrezillon> In-Reply-To: References: <20180329131054.22506-1-peda@axentia.se> <20180329153322.5e2fc1e7@bbrezillon> <20180329154416.5c1a0013@bbrezillon> <20180402142249.7e076a64@bbrezillon> <20180402212843.164d5d21@bbrezillon> <20180402222020.1d344c14@bbrezillon> <20180403091813.5fb5c18c@bbrezillon> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.15.0-dirty (GTK+ 2.24.31; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 11 Apr 2018 16:44:10 +0200 Peter Rosin wrote: > Hi Nicolas, > > Boris asked for your input on this (the datasheet difference appears to > have no bearing on the issue) elsewhere in the tree of messages. It's > now been a week or so and I'm starting to wonder if you missed this > altogether or if you are simply out of office or something? I was wondering if you had given up on this problem, it seems you did not. Did you try forcing the HLCDC to use the 2nd interface (ahb_id=1) instead of the first one?