Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S275118AbTHRWBQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Aug 2003 18:01:16 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S275126AbTHRWBP (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Aug 2003 18:01:15 -0400 Received: from fw.osdl.org ([65.172.181.6]:33751 "EHLO mail.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S275118AbTHRWBO (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Aug 2003 18:01:14 -0400 Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2003 14:57:09 -0700 From: "Randy.Dunlap" To: Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl Cc: Dominik.Strasser@t-online.de, hch@infradead.org, jgarzik@pobox.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@osdl.org Subject: Re: headers Message-Id: <20030818145709.0b5e162a.rddunlap@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: References: Organization: OSDL X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) X-Face: +5V?h'hZQPB9kW Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1575 Lines: 45 On Mon, 18 Aug 2003 21:07:44 +0200 (MEST) Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl wrote: | From garzik@gtf.org Mon Aug 18 20:14:47 2003 | | I support include/abi, or some other directory that segregates | user<->kernel shared headers away from kernel-private headers. | | I don't see how that would be auto-generated, though. Only created | through lots of hard work :) | | Yes, unfortunately. I started doing some of this a few times, | but it is an order of magnitude more work than one thinks at first. I expected that. | Already the number of include files is very large. | And the fact that it is not just include/abi but involves the architecture | doesn't make life simpler. | | No doubt we must first discuss a little bit, but not too much, | the desired directory structure and naming. | Then we must do 5% of the work, and come back to these issues. | | In case people actually want to do this, I can coordinate. | | In case people want to try just one file, do signal.h. Hm, interesting. Since there are 20+ /signal.h files and they don't always agree on signal bit numbers e.g., do we have 20+ abi/arch/signal.h files? Or 1 abi/signal.h file with many #ifdefs? ugh. The ABI is still per-arch, right? Not _one ABI_ for any/all arches. Or maybe I'm all wet. -- ~Randy "Everything is relative." - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/