Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 14 Mar 2001 13:25:38 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 14 Mar 2001 13:25:28 -0500 Received: from ns.caldera.de ([212.34.180.1]:35589 "EHLO ns.caldera.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 14 Mar 2001 13:25:12 -0500 Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2001 19:23:18 +0100 Message-Id: <200103141823.TAA11310@ns.caldera.de> From: Christoph Hellwig To: jjasen1@umbc.edu (John Jasen) Cc: , AmNet Computers Subject: Re: magic device renumbering was -- Re: Linux 2.4.2ac20 X-Newsgroups: caldera.lists.linux.kernel In-Reply-To: User-Agent: tin/1.4.1-19991201 ("Polish") (UNIX) (Linux/2.2.14 (i686)) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In article you wrote: > The problem: > drivers change their detection schemes; and changes in the kernel can > change the order in which devices are assigned names. > > For example, the DAC960(?) drivers changed their order of > detecting controllers, and I did _not_ have fun, given that the machine in > question had about 40 disks to deal with, spread across two controllers. Put LABEL=