Received: by 10.192.165.156 with SMTP id m28csp1096973imm; Wed, 11 Apr 2018 12:20:50 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx485SyFEXKz3R/7/xuXkhVa1JHz3TBz+WjN8eM87Bi2AjNMBulVjmEJXumyIg+GAJG2SDJzM X-Received: by 10.101.82.194 with SMTP id z2mr729515pgp.69.1523474450922; Wed, 11 Apr 2018 12:20:50 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1523474450; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=NYE/Em9lNs8GYSaN643jgxL+4gII8ILxmaJcMe+9XBYoKs9D9dvNkOh4twqDy4/N9o eQeDgGLuVSdHq54tRtNEemXp8XgvROynST/1fnGmcOYYQwQA1Fo15gNYLsJCsqaFGwNj B/WoEgC4IsvhAhM3hTREumxNMqmNK9V262B7I86njaXYK27GTVznyOXtWllgrCzoV7l+ If/T/6IA30i6EHr3N5MEMhQXmICTbGYiq2MNlRNeiKQSmkr41R847j59R5Gk3NshYHlT bRESyCh7RnGmiStae2wxA0tzpcSCCeDcy/o0kPdJKtqeZRdQ+Movz75gq2tHBgWLCL93 j0ow== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:mime-version:user-agent:references :in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from :arc-authentication-results; bh=Cml79Kx2C7nDNJrWNQ1lLOhNUbmeEZ5wCrfRkkSDh5U=; b=WoDSX2yZ9juf/B4dSKml1AQea470i0R6OHVvqh/s+kuC99RXDUw0+viLPijMaj2hAw S2tkOsu18S5RvDhYwWPK0qUzxjcRmJivSDk9mwpT5IEA+K5GcnhPdUBQY4kjoPyIW4Tg zb9r/+bhFfDYNAO4bwu6cleETvktghSVwaRii8rWbm6DPKXq92QCjQ+s/70B8R1pPguM v5Bxw+FgU1Eb5bK36FXFd/aDEzMmR/FGN4Blu3QTAGP88o7Q/7EEj37btuyoqlKERtwa oeP/yyVxLEhM1tpl9Ysbm7l44+7pWzfpDZbLV94yj35Uh2DztZFTbr+cGjzVA/hGzY8n YGeg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id a139si1371926pfd.308.2018.04.11.12.20.14; Wed, 11 Apr 2018 12:20:50 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757139AbeDKTPM (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 11 Apr 2018 15:15:12 -0400 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:40490 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S935042AbeDKTF1 (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Apr 2018 15:05:27 -0400 Received: from localhost (LFbn-1-12247-202.w90-92.abo.wanadoo.fr [90.92.61.202]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C4A14CE3; Wed, 11 Apr 2018 19:05:26 +0000 (UTC) From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Donald Sharp , David Ahern , "David S. Miller" Subject: [PATCH 4.9 279/310] net/ipv6: Fix route leaking between VRFs Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2018 20:36:58 +0200 Message-Id: <20180411183634.621797545@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.0 In-Reply-To: <20180411183622.305902791@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20180411183622.305902791@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.65 X-stable: review MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: David Ahern [ Upstream commit b6cdbc85234b072340b8923e69f49ec293f905dc ] Donald reported that IPv6 route leaking between VRFs is not working. The root cause is the strict argument in the call to rt6_lookup when validating the nexthop spec. ip6_route_check_nh validates the gateway and device (if given) of a route spec. It in turn could call rt6_lookup (e.g., lookup in a given table did not succeed so it falls back to a full lookup) and if so sets the strict argument to 1. That means if the egress device is given, the route lookup needs to return a result with the same device. This strict requirement does not work with VRFs (IPv4 or IPv6) because the oif in the flow struct is overridden with the index of the VRF device to trigger a match on the l3mdev rule and force the lookup to its table. The right long term solution is to add an l3mdev index to the flow struct such that the oif is not overridden. That solution will not backport well, so this patch aims for a simpler solution to relax the strict argument if the route spec device is an l3mdev slave. As done in other places, use the FLOWI_FLAG_SKIP_NH_OIF to know that the RT6_LOOKUP_F_IFACE flag needs to be removed. Fixes: ca254490c8df ("net: Add VRF support to IPv6 stack") Reported-by: Donald Sharp Signed-off-by: David Ahern Signed-off-by: David S. Miller Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- net/ipv6/route.c | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) --- a/net/ipv6/route.c +++ b/net/ipv6/route.c @@ -856,6 +856,9 @@ static struct rt6_info *ip6_pol_route_lo struct fib6_node *fn; struct rt6_info *rt; + if (fl6->flowi6_flags & FLOWI_FLAG_SKIP_NH_OIF) + flags &= ~RT6_LOOKUP_F_IFACE; + read_lock_bh(&table->tb6_lock); fn = fib6_lookup(&table->tb6_root, &fl6->daddr, &fl6->saddr); restart: