Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 14 Mar 2001 14:18:17 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 14 Mar 2001 14:18:07 -0500 Received: from h24-65-192-120.cg.shawcable.net ([24.65.192.120]:8189 "EHLO webber.adilger.int") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 14 Mar 2001 14:17:56 -0500 From: Andreas Dilger Message-Id: <200103141916.f2EJGhH10169@webber.adilger.int> Subject: Re: magic device renumbering was -- Re: Linux 2.4.2ac20 In-Reply-To: <200103141823.TAA11310@ns.caldera.de> from Christoph Hellwig at "Mar 14, 2001 07:23:18 pm" To: Christoph Hellwig Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2001 12:16:43 -0700 (MST) CC: John Jasen , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, AmNet Computers X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL66 (25)] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Christoph writes: > In article you wrote: > > drivers change their detection schemes; and changes in the kernel can > > change the order in which devices are assigned names. > > > > For example, the DAC960(?) drivers changed their order of > > detecting controllers, and I did _not_ have fun, given that the machine in > > question had about 40 disks to deal with, spread across two controllers. > > Put LABEL=