Received: by 10.192.165.156 with SMTP id m28csp1117897imm; Wed, 11 Apr 2018 12:46:50 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx4/dzQgzZ8bOhASe1VknBFpdgLaHJ+f8+EA8HnC+g+7VIWBf3n/3g/JnjkwkFm6nj4spmVKv X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:a514:: with SMTP id s20-v6mr6332196plq.272.1523476010295; Wed, 11 Apr 2018 12:46:50 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1523476010; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=eGJZuG1Ui8Gn69lTuYaAb88t9RhmCAwjIL9aqXVE4M5GrYD7JUAzFquYC+e9VYgiLe aqcUdu2heraLFZRjG0V1CiPzFtKpsEj0fEOXTfN6iwvk9IOZ+QwGcntNxtA0zQweTUX/ 3PiWXwRQ188bgD82aAqtS5BzRTfxbwvw+J5hRCYWsf0grsA8ZuoIuoPr9CGTo1ocWHPJ ez/hRDRIkVXph6SSxom89WiOXgcOngBIJhVBuranQaxAx9fhhRXhBy/X7s904aYqHLsL bzEy6syv7QRbgZToPLrxa07Fk13LZcYsswzb5EGjkqHw/Zj+OwKqSLHYm1Af3pGS2/vf D23Q== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:mime-version:user-agent:references :in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from :arc-authentication-results; bh=+BStIfeyKkwzuRjGri8udTdrQT+6ansggdEHlI7KGS0=; b=h0hL9eLDNTbhPfeJ5B86sp4YBj/l/LLrn83CqwHxuoXAxQ61M6SMAyqcNX9FlJIhO+ QsMiicfd2Cb7TdN6TD7lscTcD6Sujrt4EL5E0h8o4YmdOvNEYzoSCDeWgL0+EHrHf0zi k/1uim2AeU8tZ0fR1xXB1AOfI5j/6Z5QAIPNTdFp8B42ZUFHB/8Nfezh4iTfHAeJgxil mhAHKSdK7i7wyxbtqNxYPX2qSdMVFWUg6HH2yx2G/SHLvEwCyaucevGsaU9Cl55xo7r/ I97mT+y+7bDbYtrR15RSQ/rEzgem/tlmazfnlr1GRURNSv8+yB6LinqOc8R/XY9hQADH nZOQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id m20-v6si1755470pli.164.2018.04.11.12.46.13; Wed, 11 Apr 2018 12:46:50 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756791AbeDKTAp (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 11 Apr 2018 15:00:45 -0400 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:37826 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756746AbeDKTAg (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Apr 2018 15:00:36 -0400 Received: from localhost (LFbn-1-12247-202.w90-92.abo.wanadoo.fr [90.92.61.202]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 31A1BD72; Wed, 11 Apr 2018 19:00:36 +0000 (UTC) From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Andrea Adami , Robert Jarzmik , Daniel Thompson , Lee Jones , Sasha Levin Subject: [PATCH 4.9 143/310] backlight: tdo24m: Fix the SPI CS between transfers Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2018 20:34:42 +0200 Message-Id: <20180411183628.600691032@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.0 In-Reply-To: <20180411183622.305902791@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20180411183622.305902791@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.65 X-stable: review MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Robert Jarzmik [ Upstream commit 2023b0524a6310e9ea80daf085f51c71bff9289f ] Currently the LCD display (TD035S) on the cm-x300 platform is broken and remains blank. The TD0245S specification requires that the chipselect is toggled between commands sent to the panel. This was also the purpose of the former patch of commit f64dcac0b124 ("backlight: tdo24m: ensure chip select changes between transfers"). Unfortunately, the "cs_change" field of a SPI transfer is misleading. Its true meaning is that for a SPI message holding multiple transfers, the chip select is toggled between each transfer, but for the last transfer it remains asserted. In this driver, all the SPI messages contain exactly one transfer, which means that each transfer is the last of its message, and as a consequence the chip select is never toggled. Actually, there was a second bug hidding the first one, hence the problem was not seen until v4.6. This problem was fixed by commit a52db659c79c ("spi: pxa2xx: Fix cs_change management") for PXA based boards. This fix makes the TD035S work again on a cm-x300 board. The same applies to other PXA boards, ie. corgi and tosa. Fixes: a52db659c79c ("spi: pxa2xx: Fix cs_change management") Reported-by: Andrea Adami Signed-off-by: Robert Jarzmik Acked-by: Daniel Thompson Signed-off-by: Lee Jones Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- drivers/video/backlight/corgi_lcd.c | 2 +- drivers/video/backlight/tdo24m.c | 2 +- drivers/video/backlight/tosa_lcd.c | 2 +- 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) --- a/drivers/video/backlight/corgi_lcd.c +++ b/drivers/video/backlight/corgi_lcd.c @@ -177,7 +177,7 @@ static int corgi_ssp_lcdtg_send(struct c struct spi_message msg; struct spi_transfer xfer = { .len = 1, - .cs_change = 1, + .cs_change = 0, .tx_buf = lcd->buf, }; --- a/drivers/video/backlight/tdo24m.c +++ b/drivers/video/backlight/tdo24m.c @@ -369,7 +369,7 @@ static int tdo24m_probe(struct spi_devic spi_message_init(m); - x->cs_change = 1; + x->cs_change = 0; x->tx_buf = &lcd->buf[0]; spi_message_add_tail(x, m); --- a/drivers/video/backlight/tosa_lcd.c +++ b/drivers/video/backlight/tosa_lcd.c @@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ static int tosa_tg_send(struct spi_devic struct spi_message msg; struct spi_transfer xfer = { .len = 1, - .cs_change = 1, + .cs_change = 0, .tx_buf = buf, };