Received: by 10.192.165.156 with SMTP id m28csp1163023imm; Wed, 11 Apr 2018 13:39:17 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx48QmThyqRR7S5t0dKgRtR6uz0gmV5UBxKwm7ODAOyS6vCY8jIpWEDE4DdkkSsYWJ2olhKJG X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:20ca:: with SMTP id v10-v6mr6762710plg.9.1523479157046; Wed, 11 Apr 2018 13:39:17 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1523479157; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=OROK+M2Wx9deedTc1PUVd/0JWNRvxPtGNruMRrOIp1BQH9ySM8X7GQlmVrJlkm6unW JhOl3m7T8iut6mowh/LRKw9U4SPc4RT5ujPeUOwpJOSyJjQPlzNwxxAxBteKj1WoVOLB /QCCngR5kNRzVtE33pSYXjgZgPKyvMv+o941OqKRIlDsC/bFYCM7WJyqwzwEEZhsHxVw U6Nwf4KMSfJ4ES7mDrQOP5YGkG2xYelfcnSROURslt+DWbnBAhEHG1+j42ioeTCkup/V orcBkBc9fk6kU6BnIUVmQc0CSDcNghwObtYqr/y5zvcokWlgl/F5mHvono9PcbBFIwZJ A70g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:mime-version:user-agent:references :in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from :arc-authentication-results; bh=y9jXHNe+IqiepnDzt5bbHgHm/as0nQ1wv4jlfFgfClM=; b=T5xyoCcjAgDC+yNlGqonmyLr71dEUFaXdpgTbmXiJuT43KZYzXlfGFbfSbuA89mdpp Ao77Fo6/k0KisyG12fBEC5eehRUpXhYiLjiC+yvtz4IAgPFMwGOMz4CXla+uqPDBasDR GrcNiCg/Xn9IH9jzTF+FE4K8BCl/oyGzWLNfRmUDWa5fr5vqlh57SSDRbY+IEr7LDGUl uSU/MODreVvcxeTLpI5HkPTtRcXh+SqtbenMygik23IfXhcwNyaEWYZoiM3Ho0sEU+aJ E3+wfOXXOc89zHu6KNSMZTipzqHGgG1kJgmxwV9dfCLbz2u0tRiEQDb/AfBBfRISV/C2 fbBQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id d25si1238855pge.410.2018.04.11.13.38.40; Wed, 11 Apr 2018 13:39:16 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932569AbeDKStm (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 11 Apr 2018 14:49:42 -0400 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:60482 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932451AbeDKStj (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Apr 2018 14:49:39 -0400 Received: from localhost (LFbn-1-12247-202.w90-92.abo.wanadoo.fr [90.92.61.202]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E244994F; Wed, 11 Apr 2018 18:49:38 +0000 (UTC) From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Vaibhav Jain , Steve Best , Alexandre Belloni , Sasha Levin Subject: [PATCH 4.4 102/190] rtc: opal: Handle disabled TPO in opal_get_tpo_time() Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2018 20:35:48 +0200 Message-Id: <20180411183556.536661881@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.0 In-Reply-To: <20180411183550.114495991@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20180411183550.114495991@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.65 X-stable: review MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Vaibhav Jain [ Upstream commit 6dc1cf6f932bb0ea4d8f5e913a0a401ecacd2f03 ] On PowerNV platform when Timed-Power-On(TPO) is disabled, read of stored TPO yields value with all date components set to '0' inside opal_get_tpo_time(). The function opal_to_tm() then converts it to an offset from year 1900 yielding alarm-time == "1900-00-01 00:00:00". This causes problems with __rtc_read_alarm() that expecting an offset from "1970-00-01 00:00:00" and returned alarm-time results in a -ve value for time64_t. Which ultimately results in this error reported in kernel logs with a seemingly garbage value: "rtc rtc0: invalid alarm value: -2-1--1041528741 2005511117:71582844:32" We fix this by explicitly handling the case of all alarm date-time components being '0' inside opal_get_tpo_time() and returning -ENOENT in such a case. This signals generic rtc that no alarm is set and it bails out from the alarm initialization flow without reporting the above error. Signed-off-by: Vaibhav Jain Reported-by: Steve Best Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- drivers/rtc/rtc-opal.c | 10 ++++++++++ 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-opal.c +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-opal.c @@ -150,6 +150,16 @@ static int opal_get_tpo_time(struct devi y_m_d = be32_to_cpu(__y_m_d); h_m_s_ms = ((u64)be32_to_cpu(__h_m) << 32); + + /* check if no alarm is set */ + if (y_m_d == 0 && h_m_s_ms == 0) { + pr_debug("No alarm is set\n"); + rc = -ENOENT; + goto exit; + } else { + pr_debug("Alarm set to %x %llx\n", y_m_d, h_m_s_ms); + } + opal_to_tm(y_m_d, h_m_s_ms, &alarm->time); exit: