Received: by 10.192.165.156 with SMTP id m28csp1223026imm; Wed, 11 Apr 2018 14:58:22 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx4+YTLvJIv5n4cYfkiEildSJnGteHJt2aIZdt97oIPBeQFd8LN4ljVygZ0OfmCOtlY2+t5cz X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:b209:: with SMTP id t9-v6mr6830238plr.105.1523483901972; Wed, 11 Apr 2018 14:58:21 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1523483901; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=mAexM+ArTJnKFNPGbuOnOwdrJfQAwlQKq2QwPQlrMb/S2ZgGkhijquvanViVZG9nOY 3T/EHqLEdGfQ+Twu8xcsGshSv7byiP8Pzjnl2Bh3KXM9gIgKnTXEMXiHr26xOtn2Wzsd 5GiP5FDfOupJRL77x9xT+Xuca9yxpyLyn5FaTFfgHj+DHcxVtJk7cQUnKTQMOMq48ZN0 6pAUA3DIscdATX124AF/n+37SIIX/Ez66CqYSeCBwax2OmEgqPIRWuz3iu/xTE/wgGrt zC3Hph7RNpj1j7mQ0DPVb18H188GUOkjSRTO/gZKYONkHrGYNSfsgM5sUati+eBnjlxE ys7Q== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:mime-version:user-agent:references :in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from :arc-authentication-results; bh=N8V1ILyr8/NteBav3KBMZy/nyc2Y6TMkrDmeR9uDcbE=; b=l6q3iqfpjvODa6jGHBPaJIkRC269idyGk+ktayKD+CPcEVSu+EA/Tc2Mv3im3r39Bw OdpfoFzar96scGJKISp30HgizpQ935YYxecqiTF5B386zO6bk6laO6Zi8SvsIqhf53o9 34QDpNF6K5sN0a8tMpo9tvv3yuesHn6ac8KzLuFwGWrXnRHC2SejvlFucpQrfPayrjUR +2wbhCtx03OPuPVzS1bg5c7J11moz2oHi1KUbTK8px4DIns5RxrUfLUU4Y+GC12hV2Oi DS2is6IwcVYaODnL3YeTd6D2uc3AwWCQZLwzEBLvmVEMSD026+kWxk1PPOh7S3zp27G4 16tA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id s3-v6si1799319plb.418.2018.04.11.14.57.45; Wed, 11 Apr 2018 14:58:21 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933222AbeDKSxN (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 11 Apr 2018 14:53:13 -0400 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:33642 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932401AbeDKSxL (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Apr 2018 14:53:11 -0400 Received: from localhost (LFbn-1-12247-202.w90-92.abo.wanadoo.fr [90.92.61.202]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 326C0E3F; Wed, 11 Apr 2018 18:53:11 +0000 (UTC) From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Schuyler Patton , Grygorii Strashko , "David S. Miller" , Sasha Levin Subject: [PATCH 4.9 019/310] net: ethernet: ti: cpsw: adjust cpsw fifos depth for fullduplex flow control Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2018 20:32:38 +0200 Message-Id: <20180411183623.123821033@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.0 In-Reply-To: <20180411183622.305902791@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20180411183622.305902791@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.65 X-stable: review MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Grygorii Strashko [ Upstream commit 48f5bccc60675f8426a6159935e8636a1fd89f56 ] When users set flow control using ethtool the bits are set properly in the CPGMAC_SL MACCONTROL register, but the FIFO depth in the respective Port n Maximum FIFO Blocks (Pn_MAX_BLKS) registers remains set to the minimum size reset value. When receive flow control is enabled on a port, the port's associated FIFO block allocation must be adjusted. The port RX allocation must increase to accommodate the flow control runout. The TRM recommends numbers of 5 or 6. Hence, apply required Port FIFO configuration to Pn_MAX_BLKS.Pn_TX_MAX_BLKS=0xF and Pn_MAX_BLKS.Pn_RX_MAX_BLKS=0x5 during interface initialization. Cc: Schuyler Patton Signed-off-by: Grygorii Strashko Signed-off-by: David S. Miller Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+) --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c @@ -282,6 +282,10 @@ struct cpsw_ss_regs { /* Bit definitions for the CPSW1_TS_SEQ_LTYPE register */ #define CPSW_V1_SEQ_ID_OFS_SHIFT 16 +#define CPSW_MAX_BLKS_TX 15 +#define CPSW_MAX_BLKS_TX_SHIFT 4 +#define CPSW_MAX_BLKS_RX 5 + struct cpsw_host_regs { u32 max_blks; u32 blk_cnt; @@ -1160,11 +1164,23 @@ static void cpsw_slave_open(struct cpsw_ switch (cpsw->version) { case CPSW_VERSION_1: slave_write(slave, TX_PRIORITY_MAPPING, CPSW1_TX_PRI_MAP); + /* Increase RX FIFO size to 5 for supporting fullduplex + * flow control mode + */ + slave_write(slave, + (CPSW_MAX_BLKS_TX << CPSW_MAX_BLKS_TX_SHIFT) | + CPSW_MAX_BLKS_RX, CPSW1_MAX_BLKS); break; case CPSW_VERSION_2: case CPSW_VERSION_3: case CPSW_VERSION_4: slave_write(slave, TX_PRIORITY_MAPPING, CPSW2_TX_PRI_MAP); + /* Increase RX FIFO size to 5 for supporting fullduplex + * flow control mode + */ + slave_write(slave, + (CPSW_MAX_BLKS_TX << CPSW_MAX_BLKS_TX_SHIFT) | + CPSW_MAX_BLKS_RX, CPSW2_MAX_BLKS); break; }