Received: by 10.192.165.156 with SMTP id m28csp1820559imm; Thu, 12 Apr 2018 04:12:39 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx4+H/ZlHN0zrxWWrvHux1wMiBKYDH/SGNIgVVy+9iFrTTGw52P5OwFMZXgnQ+jHuG8wHs14N X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:5305:: with SMTP id b5-v6mr546800pli.326.1523531559795; Thu, 12 Apr 2018 04:12:39 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1523531559; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=dg1AYphDFIsN68q6fDrJRyuIhMU6Pmhdn3oVtwImtp9tXngXJmWpk/95EK0875/Xnv SkquFYB+mzs6cKXHqtf6NTpGPj2MnSOy4HlX9FEdRm8Oz6JaAkZ0oT0JVreJ2nmq+R4V jY9aCcWeawqMAE+VT+fUdmLyIF/SfmgJjUFxBgeE/4oXEhnjckPyb2mZOUpaja9oaxEZ tc/RG0bIiGlDe5Fbm29PKKj3LpAlh46/eA2Ls/4LntMmzC+4N2N9VuJ0PVvwRJmi1o4C XvyJM4+A6aK5oMiLR2q/zRQulYPCy21tBoxhOJ8tjz+8IPrI8yxry7RotqJniui79IGE 66Tg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:arc-authentication-results; bh=CYMqlthwg4vMGJlVhLtEBzdB1stWcnz+1MbPRC8BI/s=; b=TNB1TphMpNmWkAiPFvCqQjfWzg3cfu7eQ8gLto+LXJOYCH6VUzuZfiZLGNE18/5cNL Y6Iihrxwq4lsWmBh7i33SC4lAyciuAVMiG+Urhqxw0bkjSIUa3CBU77vkibhluUgoz71 bTSgTdlr7f3ASiOCL0vEiVZup37y1OcMG5mQ/if9zYt7zsi/+LeciLLDXV5QlUAlp0jM BoBxsSTUnmz6qJVWtN7NTrdo1Vnr5IJW46MPaBHStf6fJLEKoqaR+t5dtu9pAIBywE8v ct9hGdtzijVSufhw/gdNgK1nttsQ+3bOvL3m36IBlVmd9nvtgcY9fBd90fDFq1sMXXuz H6oQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id r3si2031966pgf.125.2018.04.12.04.12.02; Thu, 12 Apr 2018 04:12:39 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752900AbeDLLJG (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 12 Apr 2018 07:09:06 -0400 Received: from szxga07-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.35]:48266 "EHLO huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752785AbeDLLJC (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Apr 2018 07:09:02 -0400 Received: from DGGEMS407-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.59]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 5337C137D55BE; Thu, 12 Apr 2018 19:08:58 +0800 (CST) Received: from huawei.com (10.175.102.37) by DGGEMS407-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.207) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.361.1; Thu, 12 Apr 2018 19:08:49 +0800 From: Li Bin To: , , CC: , , Subject: [PATCH 1/2] sched/rt.c: pick and check task if double_lock_balance() unlock the rq Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2018 18:58:54 +0800 Message-ID: <1523530735-20011-2-git-send-email-huawei.libin@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.7.12.4 In-Reply-To: <1523530735-20011-1-git-send-email-huawei.libin@huawei.com> References: <1523530735-20011-1-git-send-email-huawei.libin@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Originating-IP: [10.175.102.37] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Zhou Chengming push_rt_task() pick the first pushable task and find an eligible lowest_rq, then double_lock_balance(rq, lowest_rq). So if double_lock_balance() unlock the rq (when double_lock_balance() return 1), we have to check if this task is still on the rq. The problem is that the check conditions are not sufficient: if (unlikely(task_rq(task) != rq || !cpumask_test_cpu(lowest_rq->cpu, &task->cpus_allowed) || task_running(rq, task) || !rt_task(task) || !task_on_rq_queued(task))) { cpu2 cpu1 cpu0 push_rt_task(rq1) pick task_A on rq1 find rq0 double_lock_balance(rq1, rq0) unlock(rq1) rq1 __schedule pick task_A run task_A sleep (dequeued) lock(rq0) lock(rq1) do_above_check(task_A) task_rq(task_A) == rq1 cpus_allowed unchanged task_running == false rt_task(task_A) == true try_to_wake_up(task_A) select_cpu = cpu3 enqueue(rq3, task_A) task_A->on_rq = 1 task_on_rq_queued(task_A) above_check passed, return rq0 ... migrate task_A from rq1 to rq0 So we can't rely on these checks of task_A to make sure the task_A is still on the rq1, even though we hold the rq1->lock. This patch will repick the first pushable task to be sure the task is still on the rq. Signed-off-by: Zhou Chengming Signed-off-by: Li Bin --- kernel/sched/rt.c | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------- 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/sched/rt.c b/kernel/sched/rt.c index aad49451..e51d574 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/rt.c +++ b/kernel/sched/rt.c @@ -1695,6 +1695,26 @@ static int find_lowest_rq(struct task_struct *task) return -1; } +static struct task_struct *pick_next_pushable_task(struct rq *rq) +{ + struct task_struct *p; + + if (!has_pushable_tasks(rq)) + return NULL; + + p = plist_first_entry(&rq->rt.pushable_tasks, + struct task_struct, pushable_tasks); + + BUG_ON(rq->cpu != task_cpu(p)); + BUG_ON(task_current(rq, p)); + BUG_ON(p->nr_cpus_allowed <= 1); + + BUG_ON(!task_on_rq_queued(p)); + BUG_ON(!rt_task(p)); + + return p; +} + /* Will lock the rq it finds */ static struct rq *find_lock_lowest_rq(struct task_struct *task, struct rq *rq) { @@ -1726,13 +1746,10 @@ static struct rq *find_lock_lowest_rq(struct task_struct *task, struct rq *rq) * We had to unlock the run queue. In * the mean time, task could have * migrated already or had its affinity changed. - * Also make sure that it wasn't scheduled on its rq. */ - if (unlikely(task_rq(task) != rq || - !cpumask_test_cpu(lowest_rq->cpu, &task->cpus_allowed) || - task_running(rq, task) || - !rt_task(task) || - !task_on_rq_queued(task))) { + struct task_struct *next_task = pick_next_pushable_task(rq); + if (unlikely(next_task != task || + !cpumask_test_cpu(lowest_rq->cpu, &task->cpus_allowed))) { double_unlock_balance(rq, lowest_rq); lowest_rq = NULL; @@ -1752,26 +1769,6 @@ static struct rq *find_lock_lowest_rq(struct task_struct *task, struct rq *rq) return lowest_rq; } -static struct task_struct *pick_next_pushable_task(struct rq *rq) -{ - struct task_struct *p; - - if (!has_pushable_tasks(rq)) - return NULL; - - p = plist_first_entry(&rq->rt.pushable_tasks, - struct task_struct, pushable_tasks); - - BUG_ON(rq->cpu != task_cpu(p)); - BUG_ON(task_current(rq, p)); - BUG_ON(p->nr_cpus_allowed <= 1); - - BUG_ON(!task_on_rq_queued(p)); - BUG_ON(!rt_task(p)); - - return p; -} - /* * If the current CPU has more than one RT task, see if the non * running task can migrate over to a CPU that is running a task -- 1.7.12.4