Received: by 10.192.165.156 with SMTP id m28csp1904284imm; Thu, 12 Apr 2018 05:39:07 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx4/YD+HpDVmfZKfVkz2bxWwHi+7EpgYCCTyxRLdwJGDjAmLuBWQZdLUSO1akFc8V9R7gFQXf X-Received: by 10.98.11.149 with SMTP id 21mr7517425pfl.64.1523536747924; Thu, 12 Apr 2018 05:39:07 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1523536747; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Vz4e8JdPEcBut2hTIj2vq3e9hx/c+f6dnPdf+kOKUYbX8UakW7L8gON9/zC+gQg2oZ wI+Qgjd3AtcHL7d2OOzLh2HwaTH03jwwGv4s6+dhH2V1IGygq61Vf8DRt+c7WSCqvG7g eMoN+icXHW/4BqwRwR3Uh8Uh58t2LOstcClnAqm4Hl+zKmafyfy47PiKafTYcQJqDXO9 LeKfML2euj9b+0hgvYzC269+wynbG/viT31b0OWm2mhxC8Li5Lrvy2Zj0SnTnyawcShR NOIccAlrLMTkQk031g5p1r6G+wgt2Qqa74k/8eYI2hU12DgwRUNzKcohy8iMXSo1pzqc wkoA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:to:from:date :arc-authentication-results; bh=mFlmhZOEnKiJTOYnK6m/lszOMhDm7Dmpt4kfx0LFVmI=; b=GesB44rZK04EJMoufDDyjxZ7TvOWvFV8d2qXoFhdIfkxNuquhhrbWV4tLTa0rHj7tK PEhcWZqb3fE+buDttpqKNcA8G4pLJzz67hM+Bks19gvqKOTWvCpJRI8H6dyuJTupQd3f l1a2jMPyi/3PheCf1Ah0M8hc1zaPU9T4x2u/B7DfR01DZ59N8So3Cx49xKSwVQJ+4BIz XMYFZM7FdyonfGwobNB0KyfX+NNIFkDCj83gEQVGAhaA0o4YiVoMkQP6+SqhllDPOyLY poO7Em1weiGA1nEZ6M0o4fFWPAqx/XnckqhElaYuvd+5lZR9VGERVhgQQdfzM9y9t2r3 W0kA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id b8-v6si3264323pla.272.2018.04.12.05.38.31; Thu, 12 Apr 2018 05:39:07 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752865AbeDLMcn (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 12 Apr 2018 08:32:43 -0400 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:49856 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751589AbeDLMcm (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Apr 2018 08:32:42 -0400 Received: from localhost (LFbn-1-12247-202.w90-92.abo.wanadoo.fr [90.92.61.202]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 082E4D77; Thu, 12 Apr 2018 12:32:41 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2018 14:32:34 +0200 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuahkh@osg.samsung.com, patches@kernelci.org, ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.16 00/18] 4.16.2-stable review Message-ID: <20180412123234.GD20501@kroah.com> References: <20180410212758.564682823@linuxfoundation.org> <20180411192615.hwxkbxpzpyltfttp@xps> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20180411192615.hwxkbxpzpyltfttp@xps> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 02:26:15PM -0500, Dan Rue wrote: > On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 12:23:35AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.16.2 release. > > There are 18 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > let me know. > > > > Responses should be made by Thu Apr 12 21:27:41 UTC 2018. > > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > Results from Linaro’s test farm. > No regressions on arm64, arm and x86_64. Great, thanks for testing these 3 and letting me know. greg k-h