Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAFxkdAr5c_bKEKqV2t-PKAo3iSvEkpqO1p+RPg9t-sW4yEUOnw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <152346387861.4030.4408662483445703127.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
 <152346388583.4030.15146667041427303547.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
 <CA+55aFzPo-dip8dgyo0U+g5qai9SAJU+D1c+AFJ0zV9_PBAB8Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <8z0aRQyD-6Krqntk8UD9WQjK5JSqEai2Pt5oeFU2EplgxoWiHlX5nlJXwCDHQ1WcS1oIprXimgz7UvwHCWDB9Z3dYFrEmZmtkEJSqaYMel8=@protonmail.ch>
 <CA+55aFzvnf=4OeBy5vQQ6HQoCsgCkAJw1LhSBOTkDWm3ck1pZA@mail.gmail.com> <CAFxkdAr5c_bKEKqV2t-PKAo3iSvEkpqO1p+RPg9t-sW4yEUOnw@mail.gmail.com>
From:   Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Date:   Thu, 12 Apr 2018 09:52:54 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+55aFyEaNGLoSL2SJZkcvApPJQFo1mK9KW6g-_FdAm1KSqGEw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/24] Add the ability to lock down access to the running
 kernel image
To:     Justin Forbes <jmforbes@linuxtx.org>
Cc:     Jordan Glover <Golden_Miller83@protonmail.ch>,
        David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
        linux-man <linux-man@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux API <linux-api@vger.kernel.org>,
        James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        LSM List <linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 6:09 AM, Justin Forbes <jmforbes@linuxtx.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 11, 2018, 5:38 PM Linus Torvalds
> <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
>>
>> So it's really the whole claim that distributions have been running
>> for this for the last five years that I wonder about, and how often
>> people end up being told: "just disable secure boot":.
>
> Very rarely in my experience.

Good. Do you have a handle on the reasons?

Because I'm assuming it's not /dev/{mem,kmem,port}? Because I'd really
be happier if we just say "those are legacy, don't enable them at all
for modern distros".

That way they'd _stay_ disabled even if somebody cannot handle the
other limitations, like DMA etc.

                 Linus