Received: by 10.192.165.156 with SMTP id m28csp242674imm; Thu, 12 Apr 2018 21:06:05 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx49tjHtuz+U1mXslJ2OPYHd4W+8X7xNQS1Gdfy2XU8hVkTFmxxXuorKMtA6CA5JQrkREN7RI X-Received: by 10.99.173.67 with SMTP id y3mr2845348pgo.109.1523592365572; Thu, 12 Apr 2018 21:06:05 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1523592365; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=JFIC2j/KG1PeGfUTJIM5aqKSvDNqk2+2RV9fqm9gvXVftIYDogPGL/BgUPbzr4/skP V4rkQvFPy3Ry+BXC1CX881LHbVQeELUUZ6nW0SjjHZzRdIglZjgD1/AGt1hwsWEmPHk8 PJ/2SVQrwpMHxOY/s55m6/jPvwGRdV8QhviCi595QJeJoryJzEjAnTgNEVY25656KY5c 2VRoSIdsuUE5ANe0/tQkOMgSzv63xQHSPzxHXHY/CJzFb7pQEOTgnETCY68vywiLKCAC FA3dxkNUf+yy3A36aOk8ivE2/8T8lzJnCJ30O2ZpFIHnZ+xYIJH/1isGRYWni2Cqj68c XaVQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date:dkim-signature:arc-authentication-results; bh=9Kew/G/+L5+QjnxV4zrakBWb9+84DEvv+EQR153zxzk=; b=daMhvskBxZtutW7Ram+Ab9ZYpALx29yQI1Wtqz2glGAnoqxhup3Td7XD65e4YhgfIL KE7spAa5RD4F1m23CwIo9oqFWVL+oxuxCXKAsCyGabUz5Zm1ssMlkSph+/BeaMnQoPy/ F/EQYbKWhDvVag6nEUXJQQs/baieYYvlT5ux3xSgrupltw/z07pSQtBvz5/BO/xKrOb0 GyfeFlw+Ji3PSSbHcPWWED3hugmbuX+RRQctu62oW1tu8EZGYQVbRYeFWNZ1vQHR0FkF MTbWkuR/z4C/pDJfInmsYz9djM44kKZhvDx9s3JZOm3xc29njpJpL3X3Tetzw7a34ewe ujag== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linaro.org header.s=google header.b=dX6SGO3y; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linaro.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id y5si3670638pfe.184.2018.04.12.21.05.51; Thu, 12 Apr 2018 21:06:05 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linaro.org header.s=google header.b=dX6SGO3y; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linaro.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750851AbeDMEC7 (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 13 Apr 2018 00:02:59 -0400 Received: from mail-pg0-f53.google.com ([74.125.83.53]:40937 "EHLO mail-pg0-f53.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750713AbeDMEC6 (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Apr 2018 00:02:58 -0400 Received: by mail-pg0-f53.google.com with SMTP id e9so243281pgr.7 for ; Thu, 12 Apr 2018 21:02:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=9Kew/G/+L5+QjnxV4zrakBWb9+84DEvv+EQR153zxzk=; b=dX6SGO3yLTleJJeLKCDs74bqmcEy8P4ZivPVZPWEpskBs8kZQRgyrg4dIqi89R8r4o 7uY25Ux5U8v8fTUhFUV4wbkt0iVqE0OmxXeJMfcQ8sC+ffZkEI/D5Csydg0YONLgk9ub MkZcV97K+xDymsvfEnHf26ddPUp7e5xHzqqMk= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=9Kew/G/+L5+QjnxV4zrakBWb9+84DEvv+EQR153zxzk=; b=dkz5hcutYYJtgmE9DIDVOyP358CZyZ+UuInfphlkJythFY+gR0vK6OIQgZd7Tx4I0b jcgiDLmlP7zmgf2+4ZbxjT3RqM79z6oE559EdXjkd++V23Kaq2/HQYTqIQbWvjLqI4RH FjezQrMxuWiiR0XVY8bWIUBvlCM43uTgYLaS5g2rSlhm3/E9/kOf4WOXAoTghENZAr3X WunSOdxeRENmik9rTXteJ8R4kezyuPYgcE4bKEQbEv/+OnA98JHyXuFxn5ri/ANEemuz KLJYKOqIUlnX75igeZX7HgoenxCNQAAw9vuU6QJ9oefc3bGkVRm9EHRcMtrHAFjmHZad bHow== X-Gm-Message-State: ALQs6tBd3txdZjpm/5K0gcrSkaPSy2OKikyxACXhK65OlQz5urYN8RZv Q3etl+Z78LbpY/RCTFWaBHfihyo2HHI= X-Received: by 10.99.143.75 with SMTP id r11mr2782381pgn.341.1523592177067; Thu, 12 Apr 2018 21:02:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([122.171.228.188]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t23sm10299327pgu.41.2018.04.12.21.02.55 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 12 Apr 2018 21:02:55 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2018 09:32:53 +0530 From: Viresh Kumar To: Dietmar Eggemann Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra , Quentin Perret , Thara Gopinath , linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, Morten Rasmussen , Chris Redpath , Patrick Bellasi , Valentin Schneider , "Rafael J . Wysocki" , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Vincent Guittot , Todd Kjos , Joel Fernandes , Juri Lelli , Steve Muckle , Eduardo Valentin Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 2/6] sched: Introduce energy models of CPUs Message-ID: <20180413040253.GW7671@vireshk-i7> References: <20180406153607.17815-1-dietmar.eggemann@arm.com> <20180406153607.17815-3-dietmar.eggemann@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180406153607.17815-3-dietmar.eggemann@arm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 06-04-18, 16:36, Dietmar Eggemann wrote: > diff --git a/include/linux/sched/energy.h b/include/linux/sched/energy.h > +#if defined(CONFIG_SMP) && defined(CONFIG_PM_OPP) > +extern struct sched_energy_model ** __percpu energy_model; > +extern struct static_key_false sched_energy_present; > +extern struct list_head sched_freq_domains; > + > +static inline bool sched_energy_enabled(void) > +{ > + return static_branch_unlikely(&sched_energy_present); > +} > + > +static inline struct cpumask *freq_domain_span(struct freq_domain *fd) > +{ > + return &fd->span; > +} > + > +extern void init_sched_energy(void); > + > +#define for_each_freq_domain(fdom) \ > + list_for_each_entry(fdom, &sched_freq_domains, next) > + > +#else > +struct freq_domain; > +static inline bool sched_energy_enabled(void) { return false; } > +static inline struct cpumask > +*freq_domain_span(struct freq_domain *fd) { return NULL; } > +static inline void init_sched_energy(void) { } > +#define for_each_freq_domain(fdom) for (; fdom; fdom = NULL) I am not sure if this is correct. fdom would normally be a local uninitialized variable and with above we may end up running the loop once with an invalid pointer. Maybe rewrite it as: for (fdom = NULL; fdom; ) And for the whole OPP discussion, perhaps we should have another architecture specific callback which the scheduler can call to get a ready-made energy model with all the structures filled in. That way the OPP specific stuff will move to the architecture specific callback. -- viresh