Received: by 10.192.165.156 with SMTP id m28csp339374imm; Thu, 12 Apr 2018 23:31:15 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx49OAGoQ6GZUr7oFxHVWlqhsNQsT8jXTR0QbEFh+FGthRzJbByuvQBbLlhLizvPTDZlqpS1Z X-Received: by 10.99.107.196 with SMTP id g187mr3021624pgc.384.1523601075779; Thu, 12 Apr 2018 23:31:15 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1523601075; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=sGXn8U/+8Tql2W5eceEg80GNBmWKQDhqEWTH6mDkPsi3sEOY/bfnQox2MMgx+BD6wC bmevs94/6WHFbBg0ymuPmvPueX/t0Aj8+6rzPgHDXKW/y1Fn2Pu4yjJyjiYhHwNdoyH5 bz+6wfWG91x9ZBNY7H5R6srYC65Xj2AEFwQ2QnXi83nV7BpXZvfCtKL+hguFYqWVgzWX wfNyQ86350pYaCn4PoPMbnG+iAEJePJ7MjLgL2w429o6aZlRscrezVWEppZHAkz3jHAD 5cfVAF+Y1cZHDx6PJVG/lu8zMbSg+DXfdfO6y9s2nETsQBCJxGAzqRmeOjJDHB2nbCyc bE6g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :references:in-reply-to:mime-version:dkim-signature :arc-authentication-results; bh=PtXXagPuCF4pBNL0hLJ2qB2X85Trcf9WBWvsu6ltZVE=; b=rBY09cmX7qmKtDruaEzUnkWQhOcRaKm1os+XpBSr/WvS0nsgrykIGFQsb0pYZqgmYs aElgQTSh+AZzIOY+21W417MoTOM4w8bzl00WekU2WAiJEWMRSoyUXYAIrUv3dZcBU6kD kB2QYJ2YKqcC9X2x72MkkYmSuU633ZHRbyGEwqhR4DoX27Iyie7TfRoafRn27s5PH43L 8oN1mxO2DKbGLhOItcqtOECOh8/iQhlC4OLImESg1iS5Xh+0XRu/OUjY4SA00qhEPkPB Li9vHcXMZOtwyAgsvmHbXI3cDLUqO1qGZIIrCizaSgzDtl3OR6myMUJ5O13QchPiUKTw Jo0Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linaro.org header.s=google header.b=Ra8dj0I+; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linaro.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id g3-v6si5014078pld.513.2018.04.12.23.31.02; Thu, 12 Apr 2018 23:31:15 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linaro.org header.s=google header.b=Ra8dj0I+; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linaro.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753443AbeDMGRh (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 13 Apr 2018 02:17:37 -0400 Received: from mail-ot0-f174.google.com ([74.125.82.174]:46658 "EHLO mail-ot0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753112AbeDMGRf (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Apr 2018 02:17:35 -0400 Received: by mail-ot0-f174.google.com with SMTP id v64-v6so8703191otb.13 for ; Thu, 12 Apr 2018 23:17:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=PtXXagPuCF4pBNL0hLJ2qB2X85Trcf9WBWvsu6ltZVE=; b=Ra8dj0I+dBRsWqS6JUVACfGRyaB1hWnDL2UwHB/o7cW1LhK9cLXoMf0a0Bq6WYxJam o5pg+iuANodOsBdgazTG9gJ+tKdpN6wplk+G2/wz8jE6oXGp5Djh2iMQYCKDJ1GYx3xd pnHPLs2m2vq/81OqICWRxr0+cxjIkoDNaD1J8= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=PtXXagPuCF4pBNL0hLJ2qB2X85Trcf9WBWvsu6ltZVE=; b=IpQJBEVo0qRQMd8L4OBi5//hsfyEy9FMLo6LuqfsOMfOvbdWqM3KVxNlderjRmqfgX pXNg+1dri3lkibDX1bctqLqE6QBRCjy6LvAZlzflXGSHZ3mEhiYC1imtfr6zO34qcOWV 752h0qMF8pOKm5j78jhFRhOGu51dnQUlK4JdouY8gS7WQCxSYGmrhyiRAu2sDsK1n6rm ksP6xgx6hhhpEJ/uM8gUFBEPFSSy5xao27/msXSjDJBbkeNCpwy8H1QrE5fMvlRw/GyP dXAdTuUU3WXo49kk4G1GAEQFLfhA4BJ9sro4KeFpXWfGT+dciZP6/F1Lhw1i/gvMSkjd 5Ltg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALQs6tBrvLINbHViGeqS3QuxO6tIhDVqA7omNjG3u70iCaB8SHuKIxCH uZkHujCBybTexp1ahMzzAKxFYV7NljP8kxyoSOf8Sw== X-Received: by 2002:a9d:4a:: with SMTP id 68-v6mr2487179ota.395.1523600254616; Thu, 12 Apr 2018 23:17:34 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 2002:a9d:1722:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Thu, 12 Apr 2018 23:17:34 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20180413034332.GI6014@localhost> References: <0c2b76aba6a49e583f920ae582d6815fa9cc4361.1523346135.git.baolin.wang@linaro.org> <20180411093634.GC6014@localhost> <20180412093735.GF6014@localhost> <20180413034332.GI6014@localhost> From: Baolin Wang Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2018 14:17:34 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] dmaengine: sprd: Add Spreadtrum DMA configuration To: Vinod Koul Cc: Dan Williams , Eric Long , Mark Brown , dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, LKML Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 13 April 2018 at 11:43, Vinod Koul wrote: > On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 07:36:34PM +0800, Baolin Wang wrote: >> >>> >> +/* >> >>> >> + * struct sprd_dma_config - DMA configuration structure >> >>> >> + * @config: dma slave channel config >> >>> >> + * @fragment_len: specify one fragment transfer length >> >>> >> + * @block_len: specify one block transfer length >> >>> >> + * @transcation_len: specify one transcation transfer length >> >>> >> + * @wrap_ptr: wrap pointer address, once the transfer address reaches the >> >>> >> + * 'wrap_ptr', the next transfer address will jump to the 'wrap_to' address. >> >>> >> + * @wrap_to: wrap jump to address >> >>> >> + * @req_mode: specify the DMA request mode >> >>> >> + * @int_mode: specify the DMA interrupt type >> >>> >> + */ >> >>> >> +struct sprd_dma_config { >> >>> >> + struct dma_slave_config config; >> >>> >> + u32 fragment_len; >> >>> > >> >>> > why not use _maxburst? >> >>> >> >>> Yes, I can use maxburst. >> >>> >> >>> > >> >>> >> + u32 block_len; >> >>> >> + u32 transcation_len; >> >>> > >> >>> > what does block and transaction len refer to here >> >>> >> >>> Our DMA has 3 transfer mode: transaction transfer, block transfer and >> >>> fragment transfer. One transaction transfer can contain several blocks >> >>> transfer, and each block can be set proper block step. One block can >> >>> contain several fragments transfer with proper fragment step. It can >> >>> generate interrupts when one transaction transfer or block transfer or >> >>> fragment transfer is completed if user set the interrupt type. So here >> >>> we should set the length for transaction transfer, block transfer and >> >>> fragment transfer. >> >> >> >> what are the max size these types support? >> > >> > These types max size definition: >> > >> > #define SPRD_DMA_FRG_LEN_MASK GENMASK(16, 0) >> > >> > #define SPRD_DMA_BLK_LEN_MASK GENMASK(16, 0) >> > >> > #define SPRD_DMA_TRSC_LEN_MASK GENMASK(27, 0) >> > >> >>> >> >>> > >> >>> >> + phys_addr_t wrap_ptr; >> >>> >> + phys_addr_t wrap_to; >> >>> > >> >>> > this sound sg_list to me, why are we not using that here >> >>> >> >>> It is similar to sg list, but it is not one software action, we have >> >>> hardware registers to help to jump one specified address. >> >>> >> >>> > >> >>> >> + enum sprd_dma_req_mode req_mode; >> >>> > >> >>> > Looking at definition of request mode we have frag, block, transaction list >> >>> > etc.. That should depend upon dma request. If you have been asked to >> >>> > transfer a list, you shall configure list mode. if it is a single >> >>> > transaction then it should be transaction mode! >> >>> >> >>> If I understand your points correctly, you mean we can specify the >> >>> request mode when requesting one slave channel by >> >>> 'dma_request_slave_channel()'. But we need change the request mode >> >>> dynamically following different transfer task for this channel, so I >> >>> am afraid we can not specify the request mode of this channel at >> >>> requesting time. >> >> >> >> Nope a channel has nothing to do with request type. You request and grab a >> >> channel. Then you prepare a descriptor for a dma transaction. Based on >> >> transaction requested you should intelligently break it down and create a >> >> descriptor which uses transaction/block/fragment so that DMA throughput is >> >> efficient. If prepare has sg list then you should use link list mode. >> >> Further if you support max length, say 16KB and request is for 20KB you may >> >> break it down for link list with two segments. >> > >> > OK. So I can add one more cell to specify the request mode for this channel. >> > >> > dmas = <&apdma 11 SPRD_DMA_BLK_REQ> >> > >> >> >> >> Each prep call has flags associated, that can help you configure interrupt >> >> behaviour. >> >> After more thinking, I think this will be not useful for users, since >> users need configure one DMA channel through different 3 places, >> specify the request mode in dts, specify the interrupt type through >> prep call flags, and other configuration need to be configured through >> 'struct sprd_dma_config'. That is not one good design for users. What >> do you think? Thanks. > > Agreed, users only care about grabbing a channel, setting a descriptor and > submitting that. > > I think you need to go back and think about this a bit, please do go thru > dmaengine documentation and see other driver examples. > > We don't typically expose these to users, they give us a transfer and we set > that up in hardware for efficient. Its DMA so people expect us to use fastest > mechanism available. But there are some configuration are really special for Spreadtrum DMA, and must need user to specify how to configure, especially some scenarios of audio. So I wander if we can add one pointer for 'dma_slave_config' to expand some special DMA configuration requirements, like: struct dma_slave_config { ...... unsigned int slave_id; void *platform_data; }; So if some DMA has some special configuration (such as Spreadtrum DMA), they can user this platform_data pointer. Like xilinx DMA, they also have some special configuration. > > I would say setup as Link list for sg transfers and use one of them modes > (again think efficiency) for single transfers. > > Also use all the parameters in dma_slave_config and also setup capabilities if > not done. -- Baolin.wang Best Regards