Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
From:   Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>
To:     Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Cc:     Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>,
        Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux PM list <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
        "Li, Philip" <philip.li@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Thermal management updates for v4.17-rc1
Date:   Fri, 13 Apr 2018 13:12:39 +0200
Message-id: <2093381.eDLEWQi9DB@amdc3058>
User-Agent: KMail/4.13.3 (Linux/3.13.0-96-generic; KDE/4.13.3; x86_64; ; )
In-reply-to: <10298074.ogKH1ypqfx@amdc3058>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-transfer-encoding: 7Bit
Content-type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
CMS-TYPE: 101P
References: <1523436077.16235.5.camel@intel.com>
        <3b41052a-233d-9992-223a-d16f48295905@linaro.org>
        <10298074.ogKH1ypqfx@amdc3058>
        <CGME20180413111242epcas1p4cd5ecac004dd9c1e00e1608088ff88e2@epcas1p4.samsung.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Friday, April 13, 2018 12:41:18 PM Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> On Friday, April 13, 2018 12:30:04 PM Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> > On 13/04/2018 11:28, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> > 
> > [ ... ]
> > 
> > >>> It is okay to return 0 because this code-path (the default one) will be
> > >>> never hit by the driver (probe makes sure of it) - the default case is
> > >>> here is just to silence compilation errors..
> > >>
> > >> The init function is making sure cal_type is one or another. Can you fix
> > >> it correctly by replacing the 'switch' by a 'if' instead of adding dead
> > >> branches to please gcc?
> > >>
> > >> if (data->cal_type == TYPE_TWO_POINT_TRIMMING) {
> > >> 	return ...;
> > >> }
> > >>
> > >> return ...;
> > > 
> > > I'm not the one that added this switch statement (it has been there since
> > > 2011) and I would be happy to remove it. 
> > 
> > Actually the switch statement was fine until the cleanup.
> 
> I don't see how it was fine before as the driver has never used the default
> case (always used TYPE_ONE_POINT_TRIMMING or TYPE_TWO_POINT_TRIMMING).
> 
> Could you please explain this more?
> 
> > > However could we please defer
> > > this to v4.17 and merge the current set of Exynos thermal fixes/cleanups
> > > (they simplify the driver a lot and make ground for future changes)?
> > 
> > Regarding the latest comment, this can be fixed properly by 'return' (or
> > whatever you want which does not get around of gcc warnings).
> 
> Do you mean that you want the patch with switch statement removal?
> 
> Is incremental fix OK or do you want something else?

Danial has already posted it, I hope the fix is fine with you.

Also sorry for the delay with handling issue - I was on holiday last two
days and for some reason I was under (wrong) impression that the previous
fix has been in thermal tree (so I was quite surprised today reading this
mail thread).

Best regards,
--
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
Samsung Electronics