Received: by 10.192.165.156 with SMTP id m28csp729588imm; Fri, 13 Apr 2018 06:55:46 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx4+/HokGZMGV8HONlLC9yx8pMejAAG1tOG+9keOVYg8Q6lGCo4NCdSRgNeGINloOflY8M1u1 X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:8501:: with SMTP id bj1-v6mr5256267plb.239.1523627746471; Fri, 13 Apr 2018 06:55:46 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1523627746; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=vPiMvdUWucbIfu7fZcm5QugR+wgUiC2VtlrIWJFng65RsKSPQZTl4/vDY8eWhpVXs6 IN5aP4S+ZzNiFru74cWFwdmHiMciRuCu94KKrBbvFiOdrqTLDVP7wUrAGfjvGXn3acsy M3oF0OwLXaq3Szzcz1m4qasO51mgjG3ye9Ylo68O1VNU21i6C5h/BbDIVbRsizFszKX9 Jxp7qJSRTl1etOB232gQJIYpgVi+TSQeI+3cVTeJ00i8X0AXu2KmqqdOEMvt0tPGVgHS 6oKzYYhLk8gVFZoL0ZFB1nRWiMs4EgErlc9sO4jbNIcru9FgucRCJAbCXKkSh2+87TA0 uP/Q== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date :dmarc-filter:arc-authentication-results; bh=gOYn1Wit98AOci4gwhRWnCt2yw+K7jmF70FZnR4os0Q=; b=EGr/M/QlRAUW2DKB88OBv/aEfR7sLvvgqzNzHTO2Jhqb7Eus+7FVygv6KTUl0ThV5V mer4lZ7yE4dPrr2oOT0HoLP7HnrZIt/zQt1w/stGQPPrwdFk1fE1fmOzMyuc0HlZo6Dr wM4yxvVQ8t9FJ72gSsYSaPZ7QkkBgkcBBAWOQRMShbPKg3vgUeWl/fPnxblQfjuTl+4v KdllXJAN24+RYa+Sd9R8MfevSbFRasZOKaK5zBvlsqNwm1ODi/JU93MPmL79Rrx+RMi0 d2tuVX79lqcJdTcQN1rTZOUhiEK1BsQdfKk7PvcmuantraOlPVpHrkT/hkSfkDqebJk7 5rfg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id q1si4110478pgr.455.2018.04.13.06.55.32; Fri, 13 Apr 2018 06:55:46 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754806AbeDMNpV (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 13 Apr 2018 09:45:21 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:49268 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753734AbeDMNpT (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Apr 2018 09:45:19 -0400 Received: from gandalf.local.home (cpe-66-24-56-78.stny.res.rr.com [66.24.56.78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4EDFD21771; Fri, 13 Apr 2018 13:45:17 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 4EDFD21771 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=goodmis.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=rostedt@goodmis.org Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2018 09:45:15 -0400 From: Steven Rostedt To: Tom Zanussi Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, mhiramat@kernel.org, namhyung@kernel.org, vedang.patel@intel.com, bigeasy@linutronix.de, joel.opensrc@gmail.com, joelaf@google.com, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, baohong.liu@intel.com, rajvi.jingar@intel.com, julia@ni.com, fengguang.wu@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] tracing: Add trace event error log Message-ID: <20180413094515.19fb3691@gandalf.local.home> In-Reply-To: <1523577133.11817.31.camel@tzanussi-mobl.amr.corp.intel.com> References: <194bd34e689dd6df9e48855111fd6c5c66e37fc9.1523545519.git.tom.zanussi@linux.intel.com> <20180412182001.75bfb4e2@gandalf.local.home> <1523577133.11817.31.camel@tzanussi-mobl.amr.corp.intel.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.16.0 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 12 Apr 2018 18:52:13 -0500 Tom Zanussi wrote: > Hi Steve, > > On Thu, 2018-04-12 at 18:20 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > On Thu, 12 Apr 2018 10:13:17 -0500 > > Tom Zanussi wrote: > > > > > diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace.h b/kernel/trace/trace.h > > > index 6fb46a0..f2dc7e6 100644 > > > --- a/kernel/trace/trace.h > > > +++ b/kernel/trace/trace.h > > > @@ -1765,6 +1765,9 @@ extern ssize_t trace_parse_run_command(struct file *file, > > > const char __user *buffer, size_t count, loff_t *ppos, > > > int (*createfn)(int, char**)); > > > > > > +extern void event_log_err(const char *loc, const char *cmd, const char *fmt, > > > + ...); > > > + > > > /* > > > * Normal trace_printk() and friends allocates special buffers > > > * to do the manipulation, as well as saves the print formats > > > diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_events.c b/kernel/trace/trace_events.c > > > index 05c7172..fd02e22 100644 > > > --- a/kernel/trace/trace_events.c > > > +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_events.c > > > @@ -1668,6 +1668,164 @@ static void ignore_task_cpu(void *data) > > > return ret; > > > } > > > > > > +#define EVENT_LOG_ERRS_MAX (PAGE_SIZE / sizeof(struct event_log_err)) > > > > > +#define EVENT_ERR_LOG_MASK (EVENT_LOG_ERRS_MAX - 1) > > > > BTW, the above only works if EVENT_LOG_ERRS_MAX is a power of two, > > which it's not guaranteed to be. > > > > My assumption was that we'd only ever need a page or two for the > error_log and so would always would be a power of two, since the size of > the struct event_log_err is 512. Assumptions are not what we want to rely on. There should be something like: BUILD_BUG_ON(EVENT_LOG_ERRS_MAX & EVENT_ERR_LOG_MASK); Which would guarantee that your assumption is correct otherwise the kernel wont build. > > Anyway, I should probably have put comments about all this in the code, > and I will, but the way it works kind of assumes a very small number of > errors - it's replacing a simple 'last error' facility for the hist > triggers and making it a common facility for other things that have > similar needs like Masami's kprobe_events errors. For those purposes, I > assumed it would suffice to simply be able to show that last 8 or some > similar small number of errors and constantly recycle the slots. The errors are still in the files that have the errors right? Perhaps just have a file that lists the files that contain errors. That way if something goes wrong, you can examine that file and then look at the file that contains the error? And I'm not sure it being in the events directory is the best place either, especially, if you plan to have it handle kprobe_events because that's not in the events directory. > > Basically it just splits the page into 16 strings, 2 per error, one for > the actual error text, the other for the command the user entered. The > struct event_log_err just overlays a struct on top of 2 strings just to > make it easier to manage. > > Anyway, because it is such a small number, and we start with a zeroed > page, whenever we print the error log, we print all 16 strings even if > we only have one error (2 strings). The rest are NULL and print > nothing. We start with the tail, which could also be thought of as the > 'oldest' or the 'first' error in the buffer and just cycle through them > all. Hope that clears up some of the other questions you had about how > a non-full log gets printed, etc... OK, I was thinking a NULL entry would return NULL, but we are returning a pointer to NULL. That's where I missed it. > > > > + > > > +struct event_log_err { > > > + char err[MAX_FILTER_STR_VAL]; > > > + char cmd[MAX_FILTER_STR_VAL]; > > > +}; > > > > I like the event_log_err idea, but the above can be shrunk to: > > > > struct err_info { > > u8 type; /* I can only imagine 254 types */ > > u8 pos; /* MAX_FILTER_STR_VAR = 256 */ > > }; > > > > struct event_log_err { > > struct err_info info; > > char cmd[MAX_FILTER_STR_VAL]; > > }; > > > > There's no reason to put in a bunch of text that's going to be static > > anyway. Have a lookup table like we do for filters. > > > > + log_err("Variable name not unique, need to use fully qualified name (%s) for variable: ", fqvar(system, event_name, var_name, true)); > > > > Hmm, most of the log_errs use printf strings that get expanded, so need > a destination buffer, the event_log_err->err string, but I think I see > what you're getting at - that we can get rid of the format strings > altogether and make them static strings if we use the method of simply > printing the static string and putting a caret where the error is as > below. > > > > > Instead of making the fqvar, find the location of the variable, and add: > > > > blah blah $var blah blah > > ^ > > Variable name not unique, need to use fully qualified name for variable > > > > OK, if we can do this for every error type, then we can use the lookup > table and the caret position instead of format strings. Which means > getting rid of the simple ring of strings, but whatever.. I still don't know about this change. It feels rather hacky and quickly thrown together. This is going to be something we will have to support indefinitely, and I want to have a bit more thought in it before we do anything. This isn't something I want to push into this merge window. Let's think about it more. Is this really the best way to show errors? -- Steve > > > > + > > > +static char *event_err_log; > > > +static unsigned int event_err_log_tail; > > > + > > > +struct event_log_err *get_event_log_err(void) > > > +{ > > > + struct event_log_err *err; > > > + char *errpos; > > > + > > > + if (!event_err_log) { > > > + event_err_log = (char *)get_zeroed_page(GFP_KERNEL); > > > + if (!event_err_log) > > > + return NULL; > > > + } > > > + > > > + errpos = event_err_log + event_err_log_tail * sizeof(*err); > > > + err = (struct event_log_err *)errpos; > > > + > > > + event_err_log_tail = (event_err_log_tail + 1) & EVENT_ERR_LOG_MASK; > >