Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S270806AbTHSPtr (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Aug 2003 11:49:47 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S270808AbTHSPtr (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Aug 2003 11:49:47 -0400 Received: from fw.osdl.org ([65.172.181.6]:60323 "EHLO mail.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S270806AbTHSPtp (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Aug 2003 11:49:45 -0400 Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2003 08:45:31 -0700 From: "Randy.Dunlap" To: rob@landley.net Cc: hpa@zytor.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jgarzik@pobox.com Subject: Re: headers Message-Id: <20030819084531.768d5823.rddunlap@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <200308190855.07181.rob@landley.net> References: <200308190855.07181.rob@landley.net> Organization: OSDL X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) X-Face: +5V?h'hZQPB9kW Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1678 Lines: 43 On Tue, 19 Aug 2003 08:55:06 -0400 Rob Landley wrote: | On Monday 18 August 2003 21:45, H. Peter Anvin wrote: | > Followup to: | > By author: Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl | > In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel | > | > > From garzik@gtf.org Mon Aug 18 20:14:47 2003 | > > | > > I support include/abi, or some other directory that segregates | > > user<->kernel shared headers away from kernel-private headers. | > > | > > I don't see how that would be auto-generated, though. Only created | > > through lots of hard work :) | > > | > > Yes, unfortunately. I started doing some of this a few times, | > > but it is an order of magnitude more work than one thinks at first. | > > Already the number of include files is very large. | > > And the fact that it is not just include/abi but involves the | > > architecture doesn't make life simpler. | > > | > > No doubt we must first discuss a little bit, but not too much, | > > the desired directory structure and naming. | > > Then we must do 5% of the work, and come back to these issues. | > > | > > In case people actually want to do this, I can coordinate. | > > | > > In case people want to try just one file, do signal.h. | > | > Oh yes, this is a whole lot of work. | | But is it 2.6 work, or 2.8 work? I think that we are currently discussing it as 2.7 work. -- ~Randy "Everything is relative." - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/