Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 14 Mar 2001 15:23:37 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 14 Mar 2001 15:23:28 -0500 Received: from stine.vestdata.no ([195.204.68.10]:22788 "EHLO stine.vestdata.no") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 14 Mar 2001 15:23:14 -0500 Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2001 21:21:05 +0100 From: Ragnar Kj?rstad To: Alexander Viro Cc: Andreas Dilger , Linux kernel development list , Linux FS development list Subject: Re: (struct dentry *)->vfsmnt; Message-ID: <20010314212105.C26991@vestdata.no> In-Reply-To: <200103141914.f2EJEVN10163@webber.adilger.int> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.5i In-Reply-To: ; from Alexander Viro on Wed, Mar 14, 2001 at 02:32:21PM -0500 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Mar 14, 2001 at 02:32:21PM -0500, Alexander Viro wrote: > Sorry - .last.mounted in the root of filesystem, indeed. > > > The writing side can't be done in userland without basically making > > mount(8) know about the superblock layout of each and every filesystem: > > That's a wonderful reason to put it _not_ into superblock... OK, what's > wrong with the variant above? The information will not be available without mounting the filesystem first. However - the LVM way sounded much better, so this may not matter. -- Ragnar Kj?rstad Big Storage - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/