Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Sun, 15 Apr 2018 05:06:36 -0700
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To:     Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com>
Cc:     Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
        linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Tarick Bedeir <tarick@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] IB: make INFINIBAND_ADDR_TRANS configurable
Message-ID: <20180415120636.GA10759@infradead.org>
References: <20180413070644.11974-1-gthelen@google.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20180413070644.11974-1-gthelen@google.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.2 (2017-12-15)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 12:06:44AM -0700, Greg Thelen wrote:
> Allow INFINIBAND without INFINIBAND_ADDR_TRANS.

Why?  We are pushing everyone heavily to use RDMA/CM, so making it
optional seems rather counter-intuitive.

You'll also have to fix tons of ULPs to explicitly depend on
INFINIBAND_ADDR_TRANS, or make code conditional on it.