Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S272300AbTHSRQx (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Aug 2003 13:16:53 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S274820AbTHSROE (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Aug 2003 13:14:04 -0400 Received: from mail3.ithnet.com ([217.64.64.7]:35973 "HELO heather-ng.ithnet.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S274882AbTHSRMu (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Aug 2003 13:12:50 -0400 X-Sender-Authentication: SMTPafterPOP by from 217.64.64.14 Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2003 19:12:46 +0200 From: Stephan von Krawczynski To: "David S. Miller" Cc: willy@w.ods.org, richard@aspectgroup.co.uk, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, carlosev@newipnet.com, lamont@scriptkiddie.org, davidsen@tmr.com, bloemsaa@xs4all.nl, marcelo@conectiva.com.br, netdev@oss.sgi.com, linux-net@vger.kernel.org, layes@loran.com, torvalds@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [2.4 PATCH] bugfix: ARP respond on all devices Message-Id: <20030819191246.027061dd.skraw@ithnet.com> In-Reply-To: <20030819095302.7213ddd5.davem@redhat.com> References: <353568DCBAE06148B70767C1B1A93E625EAB58@post.pc.aspectgroup.co.uk> <20030819145403.GA3407@alpha.home.local> <20030819170751.2b92ba2e.skraw@ithnet.com> <20030819085717.56046afd.davem@redhat.com> <20030819185219.116fd259.skraw@ithnet.com> <20030819095302.7213ddd5.davem@redhat.com> Organization: ith Kommunikationstechnik GmbH X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1344 Lines: 36 On Tue, 19 Aug 2003 09:53:02 -0700 "David S. Miller" wrote: > On Tue, 19 Aug 2003 18:52:19 +0200 > Stephan von Krawczynski wrote: > > > On Tue, 19 Aug 2003 08:57:17 -0700 > > "David S. Miller" wrote: > > > > > "Be liberal in what you accept, and conservative in what you send" > > > -Jon Postel > > > > If I understood what Richard said in this thread Jon just shot you > > down. The conservative way to _request_ arp would definitely be to > > request it from the "correct" subnet, because as a sender you ought > > to give credit to knowing that "bad" boxes out there won't answer if > > you do otherwise. > > In the ARP request we are using the source address in the packet we > are building for output. > > If ARP doesn't work using that source address, we can only assume IP > communication is not possible either. > > It is the box not responding to this ARP which is preventing > communication not the box creating the ARP request. Please read my example from other email. Very simple to prove you wrong here. Regards, Stephan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/