Received: by 10.192.165.156 with SMTP id m28csp567977imm; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 05:20:39 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx4+DjbKKX7l4uGw27kiyvOrq+6oHNeFZwLN7uy1aYmY8PFkRxkwa3FDm+dAiEZb38/UDSjp0 X-Received: by 10.98.201.70 with SMTP id k67mr21498622pfg.141.1523881239719; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 05:20:39 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1523881239; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=SpO1WEN1peXGD4u4QWIkgkbU4A85W26NJ4ydOuCHy3kmeU2ohAFbM2SNx7i+nRfbLV RLcGHx7EmaSMksVqV8fwCiOCMjrfi/YLPCncGZKrFFFBJT/QfA7grBo0qCUmXeBukQOU POQGm68lNGstJn6RXDnTHl5OsH4fgVDOB3AeUMfx6IfUomzalggP94/ncFCfrinmxMXL hEJwnHoHqDBHL7ziCof1EDI+apmQkbYZS8Q/uOXnlO653+CUugAAtpHeR/FVXWbOwPUG UA/4vDOCypN21OJXxhjB17moqyEp9Z0qFW7ylyZuSilIq/aYXLHUAvnwh1kmPAhOXYBf ia4g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:message-id:content-language :content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :from:references:cc:to:subject:arc-authentication-results; bh=KjQ7WF06jV20HpKfeEqyx60RMGrOWAutvwEP7fGwe9w=; b=XImJuIvmm0qWBrWJaHLWZQnn2hkeO/BVYaouAImEcWnFdRd2YsUW4Sb/+g7t9dkDHp sre0W+dak0X66oXpW8JjEZJYj2pzxG0X31qdR1a0IYCMX0GxoyHiSK0/8fywNj3djBSC pDUei/9U464Gt6T4dbaeQXZT8E+zBs5jIkW/tqdgoy2ZjdGBzGGlOEa38tAcRZn4Yx+b 0RHxE7G8rsor6uKmhFn5kMXF7S26+YKLTshQWQYn1sobQmOCd43cwXtd8j//HBWq5LqQ rM7i5j3Wqsfe9jNf1bEm2Vq4si7k8jBy7/9/jujn4b43DiuM9OGb6E0qLgnXi8NdBQYK 09LQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id m18si9281587pgu.352.2018.04.16.05.20.25; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 05:20:39 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754227AbeDPKv5 (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 16 Apr 2018 06:51:57 -0400 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:48590 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753904AbeDPKvz (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Apr 2018 06:51:55 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098417.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id w3GAnUZA024282 for ; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 06:51:54 -0400 Received: from e06smtp15.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp15.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.111]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2hcqfngp9n-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA256 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 06:51:54 -0400 Received: from localhost by e06smtp15.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 11:51:51 +0100 Received: from b06cxnps4075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.109.197) by e06smtp15.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.145) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 11:51:48 +0100 Received: from d06av21.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av21.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.232]) by b06cxnps4075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id w3GApleO56360998; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 10:51:47 GMT Received: from d06av21.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AC9F52045; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 10:42:38 +0100 (BST) Received: from [9.152.224.146] (unknown [9.152.224.146]) by d06av21.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9391A5203F; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 10:42:37 +0100 (BST) Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 05/15] KVM: s390: enable/disable AP interpretive execution To: Tony Krowiak , linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org Cc: freude@de.ibm.com, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com, borntraeger@de.ibm.com, cohuck@redhat.com, kwankhede@nvidia.com, bjsdjshi@linux.vnet.ibm.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, alex.williamson@redhat.com, alifm@linux.vnet.ibm.com, mjrosato@linux.vnet.ibm.com, jjherne@linux.vnet.ibm.com, thuth@redhat.com, pasic@linux.vnet.ibm.com, berrange@redhat.com, fiuczy@linux.vnet.ibm.com, buendgen@de.ibm.com References: <1523827345-11600-1-git-send-email-akrowiak@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1523827345-11600-6-git-send-email-akrowiak@linux.vnet.ibm.com> From: Pierre Morel Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2018 12:51:46 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1523827345-11600-6-git-send-email-akrowiak@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-US X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 18041610-0020-0000-0000-00000412683D X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 18041610-0021-0000-0000-000042A6A203 Message-Id: <15b60572-40d6-0f03-11f9-c50cb7eb00e8@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2018-04-16_06:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 impostorscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1709140000 definitions=main-1804160103 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 15/04/2018 23:22, Tony Krowiak wrote: > The VFIO AP device model exploits interpretive execution of AP > instructions (APIE) to provide guests passthrough access to AP > devices. This patch introduces a new interface to enable and > disable APIE. > > Signed-off-by: Tony Krowiak > --- > arch/s390/include/asm/kvm-ap.h | 16 ++++++++++++++++ > arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 1 + > arch/s390/kvm/kvm-ap.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++ > arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c | 9 +++++++++ > 4 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm-ap.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm-ap.h > index 736e93e..a6c092e 100644 > --- a/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm-ap.h > +++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm-ap.h > @@ -35,4 +35,20 @@ > */ > void kvm_ap_build_crycbd(struct kvm *kvm); > > +/** > + * kvm_ap_interpret_instructions > + * > + * Indicate whether AP instructions shall be interpreted. If they are not > + * interpreted, all AP instructions will be intercepted and routed back to > + * userspace. > + * > + * @kvm: the virtual machine attributes > + * @enable: indicates whether AP instructions are to be interpreted (true) or > + * or not (false). > + * > + * Returns 0 if completed successfully; otherwise, returns -EOPNOTSUPP > + * indicating that AP instructions are not installed on the guest. > + */ > +int kvm_ap_interpret_instructions(struct kvm *kvm, bool enable); > + > #endif /* _ASM_KVM_AP */ > diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h > index 3162783..5470685 100644 > --- a/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h > +++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h > @@ -715,6 +715,7 @@ struct kvm_s390_crypto { > __u32 crycbd; > __u8 aes_kw; > __u8 dea_kw; > + __u8 apie; > }; > > #define APCB0_MASK_SIZE 1 > diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-ap.c b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-ap.c > index 991bae4..55d11b5 100644 > --- a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-ap.c > +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-ap.c > @@ -58,3 +58,23 @@ void kvm_ap_build_crycbd(struct kvm *kvm) > } > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL(kvm_ap_build_crycbd); > + > +int kvm_ap_interpret_instructions(struct kvm *kvm, bool enable) > +{ > + int ret = 0; > + > + mutex_lock(&kvm->lock); > + > + if (!test_kvm_cpu_feat(kvm, KVM_S390_VM_CPU_FEAT_AP)) { Do we really need to test CPU_FEAT_AP? I understand that KVM_S390_VM_CPU_FEAT_AP means AP instructions are interpreted. shouldn't we add this information in the name? like KVM_S390_VM_CPU_FEAT_APIE > + ret = -EOPNOTSUPP; > + goto done; > + } > + > + kvm->arch.crypto.apie = enable; > + kvm_s390_vcpu_crypto_reset_all(kvm); > + > +done: > + mutex_unlock(&kvm->lock); > + return ret; > +} > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(kvm_ap_interpret_instructions); > diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c > index 55cd897..1dc8566 100644 > --- a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c > +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c > @@ -1901,6 +1901,9 @@ static void kvm_s390_crypto_init(struct kvm *kvm) > kvm->arch.crypto.crycb = &kvm->arch.sie_page2->crycb; > kvm_ap_build_crycbd(kvm); > > + /* Default setting indicating SIE shall interpret AP instructions */ > + kvm->arch.crypto.apie = 1; > + > if (!test_kvm_facility(kvm, 76)) > return; > > @@ -2434,6 +2437,12 @@ static void kvm_s390_vcpu_crypto_setup(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) > { > vcpu->arch.sie_block->crycbd = vcpu->kvm->arch.crypto.crycbd; > > + vcpu->arch.sie_block->eca &= ~ECA_APIE; > + if (vcpu->kvm->arch.crypto.apie && > + test_kvm_cpu_feat(vcpu->kvm, KVM_S390_VM_CPU_FEAT_AP)) Do we call xxx_crypto_setup() if KVM does not support AP interpretation? > + vcpu->arch.sie_block->eca |= ECA_APIE; > + > + > if (!test_kvm_facility(vcpu->kvm, 76)) > return; > -- Pierre Morel Linux/KVM/QEMU in Böblingen - Germany