Received: by 10.192.165.156 with SMTP id m28csp579818imm; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 05:33:03 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx4/HXhdc/iP4m08YDdJep8jOqTesN/OxHGMXPDrSprIt+bLLUB1gMwJn+J4ijiirNfUa97oS X-Received: by 10.99.110.5 with SMTP id j5mr13062704pgc.246.1523881983751; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 05:33:03 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1523881983; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=eRx6Q+ScxO+xd0WQ/MYfORfN35S3puwM1crwP9kOlLogM79D93iObYYrG/hAsIyFow bPZZWM8S4Aeef7PqzfKsPdwocNKEunZiZNPpXEctVsNm60WBCi5NwI/O2oHtNHjCnM8u djibTo1u/wJDu2fuvtb5kuPb/Z3z4mpl53RcASG6BGuI9/gvmL4M/XFDvDneHVBKU9nW 8xyE6V5ltLkTws1kFjGKuXPNcKUrBLy6xA9l6c+Qno/0rA4rCNN6BP0qiXUj8XX6qQ7v YoImJYHbTojn0mgUrATEs1RtqvY5dh5X1LHrJahZs5OR3Eyd5SXCX06s+OhMoQePZUO9 q5FQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :references:in-reply-to:mime-version:dkim-signature :arc-authentication-results; bh=nMD9b2aHA7VYS+3zr31hIy4dCcavEwzh9LqiLqMnunc=; b=rmK2V5mXuqRFxK+d6c9+a9/k2R2q3oGuaZL4cjaFTfBAHAMyN71+R60KVyFVF1xVFn 7VAk3DEJAu4/7ulUj2SKYIGbBrmhommTzkbMvaiNsAfblhgylrVTKO19ldJOovAQGJ9v neBskf2qJ1IeBPTsVUthAyJWaPwIn9dcEyBu+YAHrPX+C3ImuAwdsEdZFPk5NlxMDrTA bexjymv64hh3VuJMDpIXEA59VZj9MWnId2S8deIyBI440601btQIcfs6xNZNE8maLxN7 fYS3WUELD0gf9QbF3U8sPzEwOCgYm2XuhEQmmjZg74y/N8mSWsSsQa1+g5TT/93VIqkX 1yxg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20161025 header.b=dqz7frKl; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id x71si2519943pfd.252.2018.04.16.05.32.49; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 05:33:03 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20161025 header.b=dqz7frKl; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754012AbeDPMFs (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 16 Apr 2018 08:05:48 -0400 Received: from mail-pf0-f177.google.com ([209.85.192.177]:42628 "EHLO mail-pf0-f177.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752221AbeDPMFr (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Apr 2018 08:05:47 -0400 Received: by mail-pf0-f177.google.com with SMTP id o16so10423881pfk.9 for ; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 05:05:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=nMD9b2aHA7VYS+3zr31hIy4dCcavEwzh9LqiLqMnunc=; b=dqz7frKlWh3+xROODKWeuEO5fx1kNOnRijRy97UR5JdsW6B3HnyMBs4PboIfNGBEHB nxSeymyfLIAMYMdWm7ZX95nfLM+PWi7QlpLqrY66UasrgW0kU0NMc8jk8u7lSmk1damq 5/z4HvukMTMA7O21UMBQQ+TxwXv/kxxHnirAWDIi5VBx6q662Kr6hEsV0UnCrorOzqYz rUadve5n1e015mvIrjV+L+TOnQAPD+JdBVu/HMXzSyNzC5ODMrO3r64CEvfN1/+UvbnB MBYseetIIe7llrhE/GQhsSS4LnCvFX0b4u83eQ0PHRfXc++qgK9nrepwJRe2aeTSyejL M55Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=nMD9b2aHA7VYS+3zr31hIy4dCcavEwzh9LqiLqMnunc=; b=QwwoALe0gohUeF2eRkOQ6xHbMz/QGyjqQjW2/ft5cP9og8/dzGBsI7OzNgY6vC2kp3 DV92emjLXQ66+PRtS9G3asGoOemUKoIpotTKNBG1nIthil4HGgZ6NwnfpaBL9H/eqNwT e5g9UyUdAF5nrKGHymkuTohR5PqAWfPSYXjQF5yXdxINiEbEfHdg51syX0omcgbQ4+P4 zmIbEOwmCraFlkTCu2mJkY2AWMMwVY2g61sjhXuOwII29LpvBhho8sf93nV0BRcanVrq HSPxbN196oDQk+fT7hPfUcKNoyTjx4Pvz1vFx5aYhWp4hXarDvTvS553ex7HaQbLx+6i PMnQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALQs6tA54kOPBd4MiwI1uStaBcwBKWIlOdqpZ+17faQSpX0UVlIxlWX3 8Zab1GBOrpGM/FZjqy2O19eajls2HBcSbk3edUnfNg== X-Received: by 10.167.131.146 with SMTP id u18mr21356393pfm.199.1523880346166; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 05:05:46 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.100.182.136 with HTTP; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 05:05:25 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <201804150026.CFD57853.tHJOFLOSFOMVFQ@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> References: <87bdec75-3c59-6587-2436-1470263ab11f@kernel.dk> <59a08949-7e2f-42ff-edda-f24a6c624551@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> <201804102204.BDF48937.LMHJVFOFFOOSQt@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> <201804150026.CFD57853.tHJOFLOSFOMVFQ@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> From: Dmitry Vyukov Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2018 14:05:25 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: INFO: task hung in __blkdev_get To: Tetsuo Handa Cc: Jens Axboe , Ming Lei , Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , syzbot , LKML , syzkaller-bugs , Omar Sandoval Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Apr 14, 2018 at 5:26 PM, Tetsuo Handa wrote: > OK. The patch was sent to linux.git as commit 1e047eaab3bb5564. > > #syz fix: block/loop: fix deadlock after loop_set_status > > Dmitry Vyukov " wrote: >> On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 3:04 PM, Tetsuo Handa >> wrote: >> > Dmitry Vyukov wrote: >> >> On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 12:55 PM, Tetsuo Handa >> >> wrote: >> >> > Hello. >> >> > >> >> > Since syzbot is reporting so many hung up bug which involves /dev/loopX , >> >> > is it possible to "temporarily" apply below patch for testing under syzbot >> >> >> >> Unfortunately it's not possible, for full explanation please see: >> >> https://github.com/google/syzkaller/blob/master/docs/syzbot.md#no-custom-patches >> >> >> > >> > I mean, sending custom patch to linux.git for -rc and revert the custom patch >> > before -final is released. It won't take so much period until we get the result. >> >> Ah, I see, then I guess it wasn't a question to me. >> > I noticed that there already is the lockdep report at > > possible deadlock in blkdev_reread_part > https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=bf154052f0eea4bc7712499e4569505907d15889 > > entry, and no patch is proposed yet: > > https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/syzkaller-bugs/2Rw8-OM6IbM/SI4DyK-1AQAJ If it's lock inversion, I wonder why there were no lockdep report before "task hung" report... Various assorted "task hung" reports seems to be plague for syzbot at the moment. Lockdep reports should be way more actionable based solely on the inversion report.